Jacobs Solutions Inc. (J), KBR, Inc. (KBR), and Tetra Tech, Inc. (TTEK) operate in the engineering and construction sector, delivering professional services for infrastructure, defense, and environmental projects. This comparison analyzes their recent performances amid evolving market conditions, including government spending and sustainability demands. Investors and traders focused on industrials stocks with stable backlogs and growth potential will find insights into relative momentum, valuations, and sector positioning valuable for portfolio decisions.
Jacobs Solutions Inc. (J) is a global provider of technical, professional, and construction services, spanning critical infrastructure, water management, and hyperscale data centers. In recent quarters, the company achieved strong adjusted net revenue growth of 8.2% year-over-year in Q1 fiscal 2026, alongside a backlog surge to $26.3 billion, fueled by book-to-bill ratios above 1.4x TTM (trailing twelve months). EPS reached $1.53, surpassing estimates. Stock performance has been mixed year-to-date at around 2.4%, with shares near $129 amid anticipation for Q2 earnings. Sentiment benefits from AI infrastructure demand and project wins, though broader industrials pressures have tempered gains.
KBR, Inc. (KBR) specializes in science, technology, and engineering solutions, with a focus on government services, defense, and energy transition projects. Recent quarters highlight EPS growth of 53% to $0.87, supported by backlog near $17 billion and new contracts like a $510 million defense analytics award. Revenue TTM stands at $7.79 billion. Shares trade around $37, down about 6-7% year-to-date but with recent upticks on contract announcements. Positive developments in mission technology and AI alliances have lifted sentiment, countering prior share weakness.
Tetra Tech, Inc. (TTEK) delivers consulting and engineering services in water, environment, and sustainable infrastructure. Q2 fiscal 2026 results showed revenue of $1.05 billion beating estimates, EPS of $0.34 exceeding forecasts, and backlog at $4.28 billion, up 8% sequentially. The firm raised full-year guidance, with strong cash flow of $165 million. Shares hover near $32, reflecting modest year-to-date gains around 5%, buoyed by earnings momentum. Demand for environmental remediation and climate adaptation drives performance, enhancing investor confidence.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates 25 top-performing AI trading bots from over 350 available, each trading thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots adapt to current market conditions like volatility in industrials and tech, offering styles from trend trading to swing and multi-agent strategies on timeframes of 5, 15, or 60 minutes. Highlighted stats include annualized returns up to +163%, win rates reaching 88%, and profit factors over 11, with sectors like industrials and data centers featured. Traders can copy signals with risk controls. Explore these for data-driven insights tailored to today’s environment.
J, KBR, and TTEK share engineering services models but differ in focus: J emphasizes broad infrastructure and data centers, KBR leans on defense and government contracts, and TTEK targets environmental consulting. Growth drivers include massive backlogs—J at $26B, KBR ~$17B, TTEK $4B—signaling multi-year visibility. Recent momentum favors TTEK post-guidance raise, while J shows stability and KBR lags YTD. Risks involve project delays and federal budget cycles. Valuation sensitivity highlights KBR’s low PE versus peers; market sentiment tilts positive on contracts but wary of sector cyclicality.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors Jacobs Solutions Inc. (J) based on superior backlog scale, consistent earnings delivery, and positioning in high-growth areas like AI infrastructure. While KBR offers value and TTEK recent catalysts, J exhibits stronger trend stability and relative outperformance probabilities in the near term.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
J’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKBR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and TTEK’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
J’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KBR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s), and TTEK’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
J (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -0.66% price change this week, while KBR (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -2.15% , and TTEK (@Engineering & Construction) price fluctuated +1.64% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.06%.
J is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.
KBR is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
TTEK is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| J | KBR | TTEK | |
| Capitalization | 14.4B | 4.21B | 7.42B |
| EBITDA | 894M | 916M | 698M |
| Gain YTD | -7.335 | -16.682 | -14.423 |
| P/E Ratio | 35.01 | 9.47 | 16.26 |
| Revenue | 13.2B | 7.69B | 5.13B |
| Total Cash | 1.37B | 305M | 224M |
| Total Debt | 4.56B | 2.81B | 1.11B |
J | KBR | TTEK | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 84 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 36 Fair valued | 26 Undervalued | 38 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 84 | 100 | 79 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 69 | 35 | 37 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 72 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 69 | 88 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KBR's Valuation (26) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as J (36) in the null industry, and is in the same range as TTEK (38) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that KBR's stock grew similarly to J’s and similarly to TTEK’s over the last 12 months.
TTEK's Profit vs Risk Rating (79) in the Environmental Services industry is in the same range as J (84) in the null industry, and is in the same range as KBR (100) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that TTEK's stock grew similarly to J’s and similarly to KBR’s over the last 12 months.
KBR's SMR Rating (35) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as TTEK (37) in the Environmental Services industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for J (69) in the null industry. This means that KBR's stock grew similarly to TTEK’s and somewhat faster than J’s over the last 12 months.
J's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as TTEK (62) in the Environmental Services industry, and is in the same range as KBR (72) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that J's stock grew similarly to TTEK’s and similarly to KBR’s over the last 12 months.
J's P/E Growth Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as KBR (88) in the Engineering And Construction industry, and is in the same range as TTEK (97) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that J's stock grew similarly to KBR’s and similarly to TTEK’s over the last 12 months.
| J | KBR | TTEK | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A | 3 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 14 days ago 59% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 51% | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 76% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | N/A | 1 day ago 55% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KBR has been loosely correlated with J. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KBR jumps, then J could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KBR | 100% | -0.03% | ||
| J - KBR | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.94% | ||
| EXPO - KBR | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.03% | ||
| TTEK - KBR | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.93% | ||
| ACM - KBR | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.11% | ||
| STN - KBR | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.98% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTEK has been loosely correlated with ACM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TTEK jumps, then ACM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TTEK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTEK | 100% | +1.93% | ||
| ACM - TTEK | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.11% | ||
| J - TTEK | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.94% | ||
| KBR - TTEK | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| STN - TTEK | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.98% | ||
| EXPO - TTEK | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.03% | ||
More | ||||