Advertisement
PH or ROP or ZWS
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Parker-Hannifin (PH) vs. Roper Technologies (ROP) vs. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions (ZWS) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- PH (Parker-Hannifin) is showing the strongest recent momentum, supported by record aerospace demand, expanding margins, and accelerating order rates.
- ROP (Roper Technologies) posted solid fundamentals but faced a sharp post-earnings pullback on a revenue miss and softer guidance, weighing on sentiment.
- ZWS (Zurn Elkay Water Solutions) is the smallest and most specialized of the three, delivering steady growth, margin expansion, and a notably conservative balance sheet.
- The three names occupy different niches—industrial/aerospace, application software, and water management—making this a useful cross-sector stock comparison.
- Relative performance has diverged recently, with PH and ZWS trending higher while ROP has underperformed amid valuation and guidance concerns.
Introduction
Investors comparing Parker-Hannifin, Roper Technologies, and Zurn Elkay Water Solutions are weighing three profitable, cash-generative companies with very different growth engines. PH is a diversified motion-and-control and aerospace leader, ROP is a software-centric technology conglomerate, and ZWS is a pure-play water management business. Despite all three being classified broadly as industrials or technology, their market positioning, valuation sensitivity, and recent price behavior have diverged meaningfully. This comparison is relevant for traders and investors seeking to understand how business-model quality, end-market exposure, and sentiment shifts translate into relative performance across the current market environment.
PH Overview and Recent Performance
PH is a Fortune 250 leader in motion and control technologies, operating across diversified industrial segments and a large aerospace systems business. Recent market activity has favored the stock, which rallied sharply over the past year, largely on aerospace strength. In its most recent quarter, Parker reported record sales, roughly 9% reported growth and near-7% organic growth, with adjusted earnings per share up double digits. Order rates turned firmly positive across all businesses, and aerospace backlog reached record levels. Management also announced a definitive agreement to acquire Filtration Group, extending Parker's reach into aftermarket, life sciences, and HVAC/R (heating, ventilation, air conditioning, and refrigeration) markets. The main sentiment drivers have been robust commercial and defense aerospace demand, margin expansion from acquisition integration, and a gradual industrial recovery, though elevated valuation remains a point of debate.
ROP Overview and Recent Performance
ROP is a diversified technology company that operates through three segments: Application Software, Network Software & Systems, and Technology Enabled Products. The company has deliberately shifted toward niche software assets with recurring revenue and high margins. In its most recent quarter, Roper grew revenue about 10% year over year to roughly $2.06 billion, while adjusted earnings per share rose about 8%. However, revenue came in slightly below consensus, and management's forward guidance for revenue growth and adjusted earnings per share trailed analyst expectations. That combination triggered a notable sell-off, with the stock falling roughly 9% in a single week and at least one major analyst downgrading it while cutting its price target sharply. Sentiment has been pressured by concerns that Roper's software portfolio is perceived as lagging the broader artificial intelligence (AI) investment theme, despite solid underlying cash generation.
ZWS Overview and Recent Performance
ZWS is a Milwaukee-based, pure-play water management company offering specification-driven products for water safety, flow systems, hygiene, and filtered drinking water. It is substantially smaller than its two peers, with roughly $1.7 billion in recent annual sales. In its latest quarter, Zurn Elkay grew net sales about 10% year over year, with core sales up a similar amount, while adjusted earnings per share and adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) both rose. Full-year results featured record sales, adjusted EBITDA, and free cash flow, along with a 22% dividend increase and continued share repurchases. The company ended the period with net debt leverage of just 0.4x, indicating a conservative balance sheet. Growth has been driven by strength in institutional and waterworks end markets, disciplined pricing, and supply-chain improvements, partially offsetting softness in residential and certain commercial segments.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron operates hundreds of AI Trading Bots that trade thousands of different tickers across varying styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance profiles. Because not every bot suits every market regime, only the strongest and most appropriate candidates are highlighted in the curated Trending AI Robots section. These selected bots span different asset classes and trading approaches—from shorter-term momentum strategies to longer-horizon trend-following systems—each with its own statistics, drawdowns, and ticker coverage. For traders seeking an algorithmic perspective on names like PH, ROP, and ZWS, reviewing this section can help identify which strategies are currently aligned with prevailing market conditions. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to see which bots are leading today.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The clearest contrast among these three is business-model focus. PH combines cyclical industrial exposure with a high-growth aerospace franchise, giving it both cyclicality and a strong long-cycle demand tailwind. ROP is the most software-centric and capital-light, with recurring revenue and very high gross margins, but it is more sensitive to valuation multiples and investor expectations around AI. ZWS is the most defensively positioned from a balance-sheet standpoint and benefits from secular water-infrastructure and sustainability themes, though it lacks the scale and diversification of its peers.
On recent momentum, PH has been the clear leader, with positive order trends and upwardly revised guidance. ZWS has also demonstrated steady, above-market growth with expanding margins. ROP, by contrast, has seen sentiment deteriorate despite adequate fundamentals, driven by a revenue miss and cautious outlook. Risk profiles differ as well: PH and ROP carry higher exposure to acquisition integration and, in Roper's case, elevated debt, while ZWS carries minimal leverage but more limited end-market breadth. In terms of valuation sensitivity, PH and ROP trade at premium multiples that make them vulnerable to any earnings disappointment, whereas ZWS trades at a comparatively more moderate valuation.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors—trend consistency, order momentum, margin trajectory, and relative positioning—Tickeron's AI would most likely favor PH in the current environment. Parker-Hannifin combines the strongest earnings momentum with record aerospace backlog, positive order rates across all segments, and a credible acquisition growth path, characteristics that quantitative trend models tend to reward. ROP's underlying business remains high quality, but its recent guidance-driven drawdown suggests weaker near-term trend alignment. ZWS offers stability and a clean balance sheet, yet its smaller scale and narrower growth engine may cap relative outperformance. This assessment reflects probabilistic positioning rather than a definitive prediction, and conditions can shift as new data emerges.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Momentum Indicator for PH turns negative, indicating new downward trend
PH saw its Momentum Indicator move below the 0 level on October 22, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new downward move. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 89 similar instances where the indicator turned negative. In 43 of the 89 cases, the stock moved further down in the following days. The odds of a decline are at 48%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for PH turned negative on October 20, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 53 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 21 of the 53 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 40%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where PH declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 48%.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator demonstrates that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 1 day, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
The Stochastic Oscillator is in the oversold zone. Keep an eye out for a move up in the foreseeable future.
Following a +0.47% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where PH advanced for three days, in 241 of 340 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 71%.
PH may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 226 of 321 cases where PH Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 70%.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 8 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 76, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 26 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 38 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 58 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. PH’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 88 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (7.209) is normal, around the industry mean (4.140). P/E Ratio (30.480) is within average values for comparable stocks, (37.318). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (3.247) is also within normal values, averaging (1.879). Dividend Yield (0.009) settles around the average of (0.032) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (5.473) is also within normal values, averaging (186.943).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 95 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
ROP in upward trend: 10-day moving average crossed above 50-day moving average on October 23, 2026
The 10-day moving average for ROP crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 23, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 9 of 13 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 08, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on ROP as a result. In 49 of 106 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 46%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for ROP just turned positive on October 06, 2026. Looking at past instances where ROP's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 19 of 48 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 40%.
ROP moved above its 50-day moving average on October 20, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
Following a +10.21% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where ROP advanced for three days, in 142 of 337 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 42%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator demonstrates that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 3 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 10 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where ROP declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 45%.
ROP broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for ROP entered a downward trend on October 08, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 39 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. ROP’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 61 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 68 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.317) is normal, around the industry mean (-1.896). P/E Ratio (18.180) is within average values for comparable stocks, (15.157). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.393) is also within normal values, averaging (2.824). Dividend Yield (0.008) settles around the average of (0.075) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (4.782) is also within normal values, averaging (71.128).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 75 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 87 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. ROP’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 94, placing this stock worse than average.
Momentum Indicator for ZWS turns positive, indicating new upward trend
ZWS saw its Momentum Indicator move above the 0 level on October 21, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new upward move. Traders may want to consider buying the stock or buying call options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 84 similar instances where the indicator turned positive. In 62 of the 84 cases, the stock moved higher in the following days. The odds of a move higher are at 74%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for ZWS just turned positive on September 22, 2026. Looking at past instances where ZWS's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 28 of 46 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 61%.
ZWS moved above its 50-day moving average on October 20, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for ZWS crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 23, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 12 of 21 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 57%.
Following a +1.99% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where ZWS advanced for three days, in 182 of 298 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 61%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 121 of 204 cases where ZWS Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 59%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The 10-day RSI Indicator for ZWS moved out of overbought territory on October 23, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 32 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 15 of the 32 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 47%.
The Stochastic Oscillator has been in the overbought zone for 2 days. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
The 50-day moving average for ZWS moved below the 200-day moving average on October 13, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where ZWS declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 61%.
ZWS broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 02, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 42 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 93, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 50 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. ZWS’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 51 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 75 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 79 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (4.854) is normal, around the industry mean (11.672). P/E Ratio (29.604) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-17.329). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.523) is also within normal values, averaging (0.975). Dividend Yield (0.009) settles around the average of (0.059) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (4.373) is also within normal values, averaging (251.106).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 82 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
PH | ROP | ZWS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 35 | 29 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | 68 Overvalued | 79 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 100 | 42 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 38 | 61 | 51 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 39 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 26 | 87 | 82 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 75 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ROP's Valuation (68) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as ZWS (79) in the Industrial Machinery industry, and is in the same range as PH (88) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that ROP's stock grew similarly to ZWS’s and similarly to PH’s over the last 12 months.
PH's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ZWS (42) in the Industrial Machinery industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for ROP (100) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that PH's stock grew somewhat faster than ZWS’s and significantly faster than ROP’s over the last 12 months.
PH's SMR Rating (38) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as ZWS (51) in the Industrial Machinery industry, and is in the same range as ROP (61) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that PH's stock grew similarly to ZWS’s and similarly to ROP’s over the last 12 months.
ROP's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as ZWS (50) in the Industrial Machinery industry, and is in the same range as PH (58) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that ROP's stock grew similarly to ZWS’s and similarly to PH’s over the last 12 months.
PH's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ZWS (82) in the Industrial Machinery industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for ROP (87) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that PH's stock grew somewhat faster than ZWS’s and somewhat faster than ROP’s over the last 12 months.
| PH | ROP | ZWS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 47% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 40% | 3 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 37% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 42% | 3 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 18 days ago 45% | 10 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 43% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 59% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while ROP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and ZWS’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
- PH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- ROP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- ZWS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ROP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and ZWS’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- ROP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- ZWS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
PH (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -8.59% price change this week, while ROP (@Packaged Software) price change was +14.48% , and ZWS (@Industrial Specialties) price fluctuated +3.17% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -5.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -17.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was -22.38%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.53%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Specialties industry was -2.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -18.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was -24.80%.
Reported Earning Dates
PH is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
ROP is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2027.
ZWS is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Machinery (-5.73% weekly)The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
@Packaged Software (+2.68% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Industrial Specialties (-2.73% weekly)Companies in the industrial specialties industry process basic materials and minerals into various specialty products, such as flat and safety glass, fire retardant products, paints and coatings. Examples of companies operating in this industry are Sherwin-Williams Company, PPG Industries, Inc. and RPM International Inc.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CIBR | 106.12 | 3.31 | +3.22% |
| First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) | |||
| MCHS | 35.02 | 0.19 | +0.54% |
| Matthews China Innovators Active ETF (MCHS) | |||
| IVAL | 36.60 | 0.06 | +0.17% |
| Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL) | |||
| RMT | 12.62 | N/A | N/A |
| Royce Micro-Cap Trust | |||
| AVGB | 50.06 | -0.12 | -0.24% |
| Avantis Credit ETF (AVGB) | |||