QTUM
Price
$159.36
Change
+$8.37 (+5.54%)
Updated
Jun 11 closing price
Net Assets
5.64B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SOXX
Price
$586.93
Change
+$45.42 (+8.39%)
Updated
Jun 11 closing price
Net Assets
38.68B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VGT
Price
$116.07
Change
+$3.73 (+3.32%)
Updated
Jun 11 closing price
Net Assets
170.1B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

QTUM or SOXX or VGT

Header iconQTUM vs SOXX vs VGT Comparison
Open Charts QTUM vs SOXX vs VGTBanner chart's image
QTUM vs SOXX vs VGT Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) vs. iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) vs. Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT)

Key Takeaways

  • QTUM offers thematic exposure to quantum computing and machine learning with ~86 equal-weighted holdings and a 0.40% expense ratio, providing diversification beyond pure semiconductors but higher costs.
  • SOXX delivers concentrated U.S. semiconductor focus via 30 modified market-cap-weighted holdings at 0.34% expense ratio, ideal for targeted sector plays amid AI demand.
  • VGT provides broad information technology sector coverage with 317 holdings, the lowest expense ratio at 0.09%, and superior diversification across software, hardware, and semis.
  • SOXX exhibits higher volatility and concentration risk compared to VGT's balanced profile, while QTUM balances thematic tilt with moderate holdings count.
  • In recent months, SOXX has shown stronger momentum tied to semis rally, but VGT offers better risk-adjusted stability over market cycles.
  • All three benefit from AI-driven trends, with varying sensitivity: SOXX most direct, VGT broadest, QTUM forward-looking on quantum/AI tech.

Introduction

Investors navigating the technology sector face pivotal choices amid surging AI adoption and semiconductor demand. QTUM, SOXX, and VGT represent distinct approaches: QTUM targets emerging quantum computing and machine learning via a thematic index; SOXX concentrates on U.S. semiconductors powering AI chips; and VGT captures the full information technology spectrum under GICS (Global Industry Classification Standard) classification. These ETFs compete within overlapping tech themes but differ in scope—narrow industry focus versus broad sector exposure—offering tiered risk profiles. With capital flowing into AI infrastructure and policy support via the CHIPS Act, comparing their structures reveals optimal positioning for current market dynamics.

Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) Overview

The Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) seeks to track the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index (BQTUM), a modified equal-weighted benchmark of global companies deriving significant revenue from quantum computing, machine learning, or related technologies like AI chips and big data software. It holds approximately 86 stocks, promoting diversification with no single holding exceeding 3%. Top holdings include INTC (2.96%), MU (2.82%), Global Unichip Corp. (2.45%), MediaTek Inc. (2.36%), and STMicroelectronics NV (STM) (2.13%). Sector allocation leans heavily toward technology (~82%), with industrials (~10%) and communication services (~6%). The passive thematic ETF carries a 0.40% expense ratio and rebalances periodically to maintain equal weighting, emphasizing liquidity global firms in nascent quantum/AI ecosystems.

iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) Overview

The iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) tracks the NYSE Semiconductor Index, a modified market-cap-weighted portfolio of 30 U.S.-listed semiconductor firms engaged in design, manufacturing, and distribution. Key holdings dominate: MU (9.77%), AMD (9.15%), INTC (7.39%), AVGO (7.26%), and NVDA (6.55%), with top 10 comprising ~60%. Allocation is 100% technology, split ~81% semiconductors and 19% equipment. This passive fund features a 0.34% expense ratio, quarterly distributions, and high liquidity (average daily volume over 6 million shares, tight 0.01% bid-ask spread). Its structure captures the sector value chain, from chips to fabrication tools, without leverage or active management.

Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) Overview

The Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) replicates the MSCI US Investable Market Information Technology 25/50 Index, covering large-, mid-, and small-cap U.S. firms in GICS-defined IT, including software, hardware, and semiconductors. With 317 holdings, it prioritizes broad exposure; top positions: NVDA (18.53%), AAPL (15.85%), MSFT (10.21%), AVGO (4.38%), and MU (2.02%). Within technology: semiconductors (34%), hardware (19%), systems software (15%), app software (11%). The ultra-low 0.09% expense ratio supports passive full or sampling replication, low 8% turnover, quarterly dividends, and excellent liquidity (median bid-ask spread 0.03%).

Industry and Thematic Landscape

The technology sector, particularly semiconductors and AI, thrives amid record capital flows into data centers and chip fabs, projected to exceed $500 billion in AI chip sales by 2026. U.S. CHIPS Act incentives have spurred over $500 billion in private investments across 25 states, doubling fab spending to $20 billion annually through 2026. Earnings trends reflect AI tailwinds, with semis revenue up 22%+ in recent periods despite capex pressures. Regulatory shifts, like eased AI chip export rules, reduce uncertainty, while geopolitical tensions and quantum program refreshes (U.S., China, Europe) heighten supply chain risks. Macro drivers include AI infrastructure boom, though energy demands and data center backlash pose hurdles; sector volatility persists from trade dynamics and competition.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent months through early 2026, SOXX has led with robust gains (~73% YTD estimates from AI semis surge), outpacing QTUM (~32%) and VGT (~19%), driven by concentrated exposure to high-flying chips like NVDA and AMD amid Q1 rallies. However, SOXX displays elevated volatility (beta ~1.77-2.06) and deeper drawdowns (e.g., steeper 5-year max than VGT's -35%), amplifying sensitivity to cycle shifts like Q1 reversals. VGT offers smoother trend consistency via diversification beyond semis, lower beta (~1.33), and muted drawdowns, while QTUM's equal-weighting tempers concentration risk but trails on pure semis momentum. Structural differences explain divergences: SOXX's narrow focus heightens macro sensitivity (e.g., capex, exports), VGT balances with software stability, QTUM adds quantum upside potential.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes like ETFs. Explore it today to uncover hidden gems in tech sectors.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI favors VGT with high probability due to its unmatched cost efficiency (0.09% expense ratio), extensive diversification (317 holdings), low turnover, and balanced risk-adjusted positioning across IT subsectors. While SOXX excels in semis momentum and QTUM in thematic innovation, VGT's structural breadth and stability better align with sustained AI/tech cycles, minimizing concentration risks probabilistically over multi-month horizons.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VGT has more net assets: 170B vs. SOXX (38.7B) and QTUM (5.64B). SOXX has a higher annual dividend yield than QTUM and VGT: SOXX (95.016) vs QTUM (45.616) and VGT (23.187). QTUM was incepted earlier than SOXX and VGT: QTUM (8 years) vs SOXX (25 years) and VGT (22 years). VGT (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than SOXX (0.34) and QTUM (0.40). QTUM has a higher turnover SOXX (27.00) and VGT (8.00) vs SOXX (27.00) and VGT (8.00).
QTUMSOXXVGT
Gain YTD45.61695.01623.187
Net Assets5.64B38.7B170B
Total Expense Ratio0.400.340.09
Turnover42.0027.008.00
Yield0.730.290.32
Fund Existence8 years25 years22 years
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QTUMSOXXVGT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QTUM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SOXX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VGT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XXRP2.560.20
+8.47%
Teucrium 2X Long Daily Xrp ETF
EMET42.922.46
+6.08%
VanEck Copper and ElectrificationMtlsETF
XME118.355.92
+5.27%
Stt Strt®SPDR®S&P®Mtls &MngETF
MID66.161.20
+1.85%
American Century Mid Cap Gr Impact ETF
ICLO25.680.07
+0.27%
Invesco AAA CLO Floating Rate Note ETF

QTUM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTUM has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTUM jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QTUM
1D Price
Change %
QTUM100%
+5.54%
LRCX - QTUM
78%
Closely correlated
+12.65%
AMAT - QTUM
73%
Closely correlated
+11.19%
MKSI - QTUM
73%
Closely correlated
+9.25%
TSM - QTUM
72%
Closely correlated
+3.50%
ONTO - QTUM
72%
Closely correlated
+12.70%
More

SOXX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SOXX has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SOXX jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SOXX
1D Price
Change %
SOXX100%
+8.39%
LRCX - SOXX
86%
Closely correlated
+12.65%
AMAT - SOXX
83%
Closely correlated
+11.19%
KLAC - SOXX
81%
Closely correlated
+12.92%
MPWR - SOXX
80%
Closely correlated
+7.91%
ASML - SOXX
77%
Closely correlated
+9.53%
More