RL
Price
$270.24
Change
-$4.57 (-1.66%)
Updated
Jun 9, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12B
63 days until earnings call
RM
Price
$27.91
Change
+$0.47 (+1.71%)
Updated
Jun 9, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
236.25M
50 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

RL vs RM

Header iconRL vs RM Comparison
Open Charts RL vs RMBanner chart's image
Ralph Lauren
Price$270.24
Change-$4.57 (-1.66%)
Volume$3.01K
Capitalization12B
REGIONAL MANAGEMENT
Price$27.91
Change+$0.47 (+1.71%)
Volume$300
Capitalization236.25M
RL vs RM Comparison Chart
Loading...
RL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RL vs. RM commentary
Jun 10, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RL is a Buy and RM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 10, 2025
Stock price -- (RL: $270.32 vs. RM: $27.84)
Brand notoriety: RL and RM are both not notable
RL represents the Apparel/Footwear, while RM is part of the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RL: 100% vs. RM: 82%
Market capitalization -- RL: $12B vs. RM: $236.25M
RL [@Apparel/Footwear] is valued at $12B. RM’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $236.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Apparel/Footwear] industry ranges from $140.24B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Apparel/Footwear] industry is $6.86B. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RL’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileRM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • RL’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • RM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RL is a better buy in the long-term than RM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RM’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RM’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RM is a better buy in the short-term than RL.

Price Growth

RL (@Apparel/Footwear) experienced а -2.03% price change this week, while RM (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +5.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear industry was +0.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.48%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +0.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

RL is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

RM is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Apparel/Footwear (+0.98% weekly)

Apparel/footwear might be slightly more ‘cyclical’ in the largely non-cyclical category of non-durables. While digital giants like Amazon have been rapidly expanding their presence, traditional clothing/footwear retailers have also been bulking up their online presence in recent years, to milk the burgeoning trend of online shopping among consumers across the globe. The apparel and footwear retail market was valued at around $ 360 billion in 2018, and this figure was expected to reach about $386 billion by 2020 (according to a Statista report). NIKE, Inc, V.F. Corporation and Under Armour, Inc. are some of the companies with the largest U.S. stock market caps in this segment.

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+0.54% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RL($12B) has a higher market cap than RM($236M). RL has higher P/E ratio than RM: RL (20.93) vs RM (14.49). RL YTD gains are higher at: 17.462 vs. RM (-16.497). RL has more cash in the bank: 1.92B vs. RM (7.41M). RM has less debt than RL: RM (1.43B) vs RL (2.76B). RL has higher revenues than RM: RL (6.6B) vs RM (484M).
RLRMRL / RM
Capitalization12B236M5,085%
EBITDA983MN/A-
Gain YTD17.462-16.497-106%
P/E Ratio20.9314.49144%
Revenue6.6B484M1,364%
Total Cash1.92B7.41M25,860%
Total Debt2.76B1.43B192%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RL vs RM: Fundamental Ratings
RL
RM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1763
SMR RATING
1..100
359
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
762
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2386
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RM's Valuation (22) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RL (56) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry. This means that RM’s stock grew somewhat faster than RL’s over the last 12 months.

RL's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RM (63) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that RL’s stock grew somewhat faster than RM’s over the last 12 months.

RM's SMR Rating (9) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as RL (35) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry. This means that RM’s stock grew similarly to RL’s over the last 12 months.

RL's Price Growth Rating (7) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RM (62) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that RL’s stock grew somewhat faster than RM’s over the last 12 months.

RL's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RM (86) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that RL’s stock grew somewhat faster than RM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RLRM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MCN6.120.03
+0.49%
Madison Covered Call & Equity Strategy Fund
VBR192.520.79
+0.41%
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
IWFL43.95N/A
N/A
ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Gr Fctr TR ETN
USPX52.68N/A
N/A
Franklin US Equity Index ETF
FNY80.86-0.29
-0.35%
First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX® ETF

RL and Stocks

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RL has been closely correlated with PVH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RL jumps, then PVH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RL
1D Price
Change %
RL100%
-1.63%
PVH - RL
70%
Closely correlated
-0.12%
VFC - RL
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.44%
LEVI - RL
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
SKX - RL
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
SHOO - RL
62%
Loosely correlated
+5.45%
More

RM and Stocks

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RM has been loosely correlated with ATLC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RM jumps, then ATLC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RM
1D Price
Change %
RM100%
+1.46%
ATLC - RM
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
ENVA - RM
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
SYF - RM
55%
Loosely correlated
+2.72%
DFS - RM
53%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AXP - RM
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.30%
More