Levi Strauss and Ralph Lauren represent two established players in the global apparel industry, each with iconic brands and distinct market positions. This comparison examines their recent stock performance, business fundamentals, and positioning amid evolving consumer trends and economic conditions. Institutional investors, active traders, and long-term portfolio managers focused on the consumer discretionary sector may find this analysis useful for assessing relative value, risk profiles, and momentum shifts. The review draws on verifiable market data and company developments to highlight contrasts without favoring either security.
Levi Strauss & Co. designs, markets, and sells denim and casual apparel under the Levi’s brand and other labels worldwide. In recent weeks, LEVI shares have traded in a range near $21, reflecting a modest pullback of approximately 5% over the past 30 days. The company’s first-quarter 2026 results, released in early April, showed net revenues rising 14% on a reported basis and 9% organically, driven by strength across regions and product categories. Operating margins remained solid despite some compression, and management noted continued progress in direct-to-consumer initiatives. Broader market activity has tempered sentiment, with year-to-date returns lagging the S&P 500, yet the earnings beat provided a positive catalyst relative to peers.
Ralph Lauren Corporation creates, markets, and distributes premium lifestyle products under the Ralph Lauren, Polo, and other brands globally. Over recent market activity, RL shares have declined more than 9% in the past month, trading near $326 as of mid-May 2026. The company is scheduled to report fiscal fourth-quarter results on May 21, 2026, with consensus estimates projecting revenue near $1.84 billion. Year-to-date performance has trailed broader indices, consistent with sector pressures on discretionary spending. Ralph Lauren continues to emphasize brand heritage, collaborations, and operational efficiency, supporting gross margins above 68% in prior periods. Recent price behavior reflects investor caution ahead of the earnings release and prevailing macroeconomic uncertainty.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the highest-performing artificial intelligence trading bots from a library of hundreds that analyze and trade thousands of tickers. Only bots demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions, consistent trend capture, and favorable risk-adjusted statistics earn placement in this dynamic section. Available bots span a wide array of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance metrics, with many achieving success rates between 60% and 80% alongside varying profit factors and drawdown profiles. Users can review detailed statistics for each bot to identify those best suited to current conditions. Explore the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page to evaluate options that match individual trading objectives.
Levi Strauss operates primarily in the accessible denim and casual-wear segment with a growing emphasis on direct-to-consumer channels, whereas Ralph Lauren focuses on premium lifestyle and luxury positioning across apparel, accessories, and home products. Growth drivers for LEVI center on volume expansion and geographic diversification, while RL leverages brand exclusivity and higher average selling prices. Recent momentum has favored LEVI following its first-quarter beat, contrasting with RL’s pre-earnings consolidation. Risk factors include shared exposure to consumer spending cycles and supply-chain costs, yet Ralph Lauren’s elevated gross margins provide a buffer compared with Levi Strauss’s more volume-oriented model. Market sentiment remains tempered for both amid broader retail-sector rotation, with valuation metrics showing LEVI trading at a lower forward earnings multiple than RL.
Based on observable factors including earnings momentum, trend consistency, and relative positioning within the apparel sector, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a higher probability of favorable near-term performance to LEVI. The recent first-quarter results and milder price retracement provide measurable support compared with Ralph Lauren’s upcoming earnings event and steeper recent decline. This assessment reflects probabilistic weighting of available data rather than a guarantee of future outcomes.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LEVI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRL’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LEVI’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RL’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
LEVI (@Apparel/Footwear) experienced а -1.83% price change this week, while RL (@Apparel/Footwear) price change was -0.35% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear industry was -1.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.64%.
LEVI is expected to report earnings on Jul 02, 2026.
RL is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.
Apparel/footwear might be slightly more ‘cyclical’ in the largely non-cyclical category of non-durables. While digital giants like Amazon have been rapidly expanding their presence, traditional clothing/footwear retailers have also been bulking up their online presence in recent years, to milk the burgeoning trend of online shopping among consumers across the globe. The apparel and footwear retail market was valued at around $ 360 billion in 2018, and this figure was expected to reach about $386 billion by 2020 (according to a Statista report). NIKE, Inc, V.F. Corporation and Under Armour, Inc. are some of the companies with the largest U.S. stock market caps in this segment.
| LEVI | RL | LEVI / RL | |
| Capitalization | 9.08B | 24.5B | 37% |
| EBITDA | 949M | 1.47B | 65% |
| Gain YTD | 15.281 | 16.526 | 92% |
| P/E Ratio | 17.36 | 27.20 | 64% |
| Revenue | 6.5B | 8.12B | 80% |
| Total Cash | 812M | 2.07B | 39% |
| Total Debt | 2.32B | 3.01B | 77% |
LEVI | RL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 30 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | 71 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 12 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 34 | 28 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 10 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 36 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LEVI's Valuation (26) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RL (71) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry. This means that LEVI’s stock grew somewhat faster than RL’s over the last 12 months.
RL's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is significantly better than the same rating for LEVI (100) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that RL’s stock grew significantly faster than LEVI’s over the last 12 months.
RL's SMR Rating (28) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is in the same range as LEVI (34) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that RL’s stock grew similarly to LEVI’s over the last 12 months.
RL's Price Growth Rating (10) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is in the same range as LEVI (42) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that RL’s stock grew similarly to LEVI’s over the last 12 months.
RL's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is in the same range as LEVI (65) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that RL’s stock grew similarly to LEVI’s over the last 12 months.
| LEVI | RL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 69% | 8 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 67% | 6 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 70% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LEVI has been loosely correlated with SHOO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LEVI jumps, then SHOO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LEVI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEVI | 100% | -0.38% | ||
| SHOO - LEVI | 59% Loosely correlated | -3.30% | ||
| RL - LEVI | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| CAL - LEVI | 55% Loosely correlated | -3.58% | ||
| PVH - LEVI | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.17% | ||
| CROX - LEVI | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.00% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RL has been loosely correlated with WWW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RL jumps, then WWW could also see price increases.