Shell plc (SHEL), TotalEnergies SE (TTE), and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) represent leading integrated oil and gas supermajors, each with global upstream, midstream, and downstream operations. This comparison is particularly relevant for energy sector investors and traders assessing relative performance amid fluctuating oil prices driven by geopolitical tensions and supply disruptions. Key metrics like recent earnings, shareholder returns, production trends, and valuation provide insights into their positioning in the current market environment.
Shell plc (SHEL), headquartered in London, is a British multinational engaged in oil and gas exploration, production, refining, and marketing, with a strong focus on liquefied natural gas (LNG). In recent market activity, SHEL shares have traded lower amid broader sector pressures from volatile crude prices. Sentiment was supported by robust first-quarter oil trading results, which surged due to supply disruptions from Middle East conflicts, helping offset weaker refining margins. The stock's price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio remains attractive relative to peers, appealing to value-oriented investors tracking energy flows.
TotalEnergies SE (TTE), based in France, operates across the energy spectrum, including oil, gas, renewables, and electricity, positioning it as a leader in the energy transition. Over recent weeks, TTE shares advanced following strong first-quarter results, with earnings up 29% driven by elevated trading and oil prices despite output challenges. The company raised its dividend and doubled share buybacks, enhancing shareholder appeal and bolstering market sentiment in a high-volatility environment.
Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM), a U.S.-based supermajor, emphasizes upstream production, refining, and chemicals, with significant exposure to shale and international assets. In recent trading, XOM shares pulled back from March highs but demonstrated resilience, beating first-quarter adjusted earnings forecasts despite a 6% production hit from Iran-related disruptions. Growth in Guyana and the Permian Basin supported results, while the CEO highlighted expectations for sustained higher oil prices, influencing positive long-term positioning.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of 25 top-performing AI trading bots from its library of 351 bots, each designed to trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and sectors. These bots showcase impressive stats, including annualized returns from +23.53% to +163.10%, win rates of 51.30% to 88.33%, and profit factors up to 11.70. Styles range from trend trading and swing trading to multi-agent systems on 5-minute to 60-minute charts, with some targeting energy sectors like "Energy and Precious Metals" (+76.35% annualized) or "OIL & Semiconductor" (+93.26%). Traders can explore these high-conviction options tailored to current conditions for potential market outperformance.
SHEL, TTE, and XOM share integrated business models but differ in geographic focus: XOM leans heavily on U.S. shale (Permian) and Guyana for growth, while SHEL and TTE emphasize international LNG and renewables exposure. Recent momentum favors TTE on shareholder returns, with XOM showing superior production ramps. Risk factors include oil price sensitivity and geopolitics, amplified by Middle East events. Valuation-wise, XOM's trailing P/E of 25.72 contrasts SHEL's lower multiple, with SHEL leading dividend yields; market sentiment tilts toward dividend payers amid uncertainty.
Tickeron’s AI analysis would likely favor XOM in the current environment, given its trend consistency in production growth, adjusted earnings resilience, and CEO commentary on elevated oil prices as catalysts. While TTE excels in shareholder distributions and SHEL in trading prowess, XOM's scale and relative stability position it probabilistically stronger for near-term outperformance.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SHEL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTTE’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s), and XOM’s FA Score reflects 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SHEL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTE’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and XOM’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
SHEL (@Integrated Oil) experienced а +1.66% price change this week, while TTE (@Integrated Oil) price change was +4.29% , and XOM (@Integrated Oil) price fluctuated +9.98% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was +1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.16%.
SHEL is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
TTE is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
XOM is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2026.
Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.
| SHEL | TTE | XOM | |
| Capitalization | 237B | 204B | 655B |
| EBITDA | 57.7B | 43B | 64.4B |
| Gain YTD | 17.253 | 41.058 | 33.000 |
| P/E Ratio | 13.30 | 13.69 | 26.59 |
| Revenue | 267B | 184B | 326B |
| Total Cash | 23.1B | 29.9B | N/A |
| Total Debt | 75.6B | 64B | 43.5B |
SHEL | TTE | XOM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 78 | 93 | 29 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 37 Fair valued | 25 Undervalued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 6 | 5 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 68 | 62 | 71 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 41 | 26 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 20 | 11 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TTE's Valuation (25) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as SHEL (37) in the null industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for XOM (68) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that TTE's stock grew similarly to SHEL’s and somewhat faster than XOM’s over the last 12 months.
XOM's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as TTE (6) in the Integrated Oil industry, and is in the same range as SHEL (6) in the null industry. This means that XOM's stock grew similarly to TTE’s and similarly to SHEL’s over the last 12 months.
TTE's SMR Rating (62) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as SHEL (68) in the null industry, and is in the same range as XOM (71) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that TTE's stock grew similarly to SHEL’s and similarly to XOM’s over the last 12 months.
XOM's Price Growth Rating (26) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as TTE (41) in the Integrated Oil industry, and is in the same range as SHEL (48) in the null industry. This means that XOM's stock grew similarly to TTE’s and similarly to SHEL’s over the last 12 months.
XOM's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as TTE (20) in the Integrated Oil industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for SHEL (63) in the null industry. This means that XOM's stock grew similarly to TTE’s and somewhat faster than SHEL’s over the last 12 months.
| SHEL | TTE | XOM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 44% | 3 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 42% | 3 days ago 55% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 39% | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 46% | 10 days ago 48% | 10 days ago 44% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 38% | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 49% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PAUG | 45.06 | -0.06 | -0.13% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Power BufferETFAug | |||
| CSTK | 31.66 | -0.18 | -0.58% |
| Invesco Comstock Contrarian Equity ETF | |||
| SPE | 14.19 | -0.10 | -0.70% |
| Special Opportunities Fund | |||
| MFLX | 17.02 | -0.12 | -0.73% |
| First Trust Flexible Muncpl Hgh Inc ETF | |||
| VTI | 362.74 | -4.66 | -1.27% |
| Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHEL has been closely correlated with E. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SHEL jumps, then E could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHEL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHEL | 100% | +1.01% | ||
| E - SHEL | 80% Closely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| BP - SHEL | 75% Closely correlated | +1.67% | ||
| CRGY - SHEL | 71% Closely correlated | +3.41% | ||
| EQNR - SHEL | 71% Closely correlated | +3.57% | ||
| XOM - SHEL | 66% Loosely correlated | +4.07% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTE has been loosely correlated with CRGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TTE jumps, then CRGY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TTE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTE | 100% | +0.94% | ||
| CRGY - TTE | 60% Loosely correlated | +3.41% | ||
| REPYY - TTE | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.69% | ||
| OMVKY - TTE | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| E - TTE | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| GLPEY - TTE | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.15% | ||
More | ||||