SPXL
Price
$262.56
Change
-$22.50 (-7.89%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Net Assets
6.18B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TQQQ
Price
$73.05
Change
-$12.17 (-14.28%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Net Assets
33.96B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XDSQ
Price
$42.67
Change
-$0.13 (-0.30%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Net Assets
68.26M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SPXL or TQQQ or XDSQ

Header iconSPXL vs TQQQ vs XDSQ Comparison
Open Charts SPXL vs TQQQ vs XDSQBanner chart's image
SPXL vs TQQQ vs XDSQ Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) vs. ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) vs. Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETF – Quarterly (XDSQ)

Key Takeaways

  • SPXL and TQQQ both deliver daily 3x leveraged exposure through derivatives but target different benchmarks: the broad S&P 500 Index for SPXL versus the technology-heavy Nasdaq-100 Index for TQQQ.
  • XDSQ employs a structured options-based approach that targets 2x upside participation in the S&P 500 (subject to a quarterly cap) while providing approximately 1x downside exposure, resetting each quarter.
  • Expense ratios are closely aligned, with SPXL at 0.84%, TQQQ at 0.82% net, and XDSQ at 0.79%, reflecting modest cost differences across leveraged and accelerated strategies.
  • Holdings profiles differ sharply: SPXL and TQQQ maintain broad underlying index exposure via swaps and futures, while XDSQ relies on a concentrated options overlay with far fewer positions.
  • Risk profiles vary by design—daily-reset leveraged ETFs like SPXL and TQQQ exhibit higher volatility and compounding effects over longer periods, whereas XDSQ offers defined-outcome mechanics that temper extreme moves within each quarterly period.
  • Relative positioning favors SPXL for broad-market leveraged beta, TQQQ for concentrated growth-sector amplification, and XDSQ for investors seeking asymmetric upside with downside protection in a single vehicle.

Introduction

These three exchange-traded funds (ETFs) represent distinct approaches to amplified U.S. equity exposure within the same broad large-cap universe. SPXL and TQQQ compete as daily-reset leveraged products but diverge in benchmark focus, while XDSQ introduces a structured, outcome-oriented alternative. The comparison highlights how investors can access tiered risk exposures—full 3x daily leverage on broad or tech-centric indexes versus capped 2x upside with buffered downside—making them relevant for tactical allocation decisions amid evolving market volatility and sector rotation.

Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) Overview

The SPXL ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the daily performance of the S&P 500 Index. It achieves this objective through a combination of swap agreements, futures contracts, and other derivatives rather than direct stock ownership. The fund holds approximately 500 positions in line with the underlying index constituents. Top holdings mirror the S&P 500’s largest components, including technology leaders such as Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft. Sector allocation closely tracks the S&P 500, with heavy weightings in information technology, financials, and health care. The expense ratio stands at 0.84%. As a passively managed, daily-reset leveraged product, SPXL is designed for short-term tactical use and resets leverage each trading day.

ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) Overview

The TQQQ ETF targets daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. Like SPXL, it employs derivatives including swaps and futures to deliver leveraged exposure without holding the full basket of underlying securities directly. The fund maintains exposure aligned with roughly 100 to 120 Nasdaq-100 constituents. Top holdings emphasize large technology and growth companies such as Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Amazon, and Broadcom. Sector allocation is heavily concentrated in information technology and communication services. The net expense ratio is 0.82%. TQQQ operates as a passively managed, daily-reset leveraged ETF suited primarily for short-term strategies.

Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETF – Quarterly (XDSQ) Overview

The XDSQ ETF pursues a structured outcome strategy that seeks to deliver approximately 2x the upside return of an S&P 500 ETF, subject to a quarterly cap, while providing roughly 1x exposure on the downside over each outcome period. It utilizes options overlays on the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) rather than traditional leverage. The fund typically holds a small number of positions, often centered on options contracts. Sector exposure aligns with the S&P 500’s broad distribution across information technology, health care, financials, and other sectors. The expense ratio is 0.79%. XDSQ resets its outcome parameters quarterly and is classified as an actively managed structured product designed for investors seeking defined participation mechanics.

Industry and Thematic Landscape

All three ETFs operate within the U.S. large-cap equity space, influenced by macroeconomic factors including interest-rate policy, corporate earnings growth, and technological innovation. Capital flows have favored growth-oriented sectors in recent market cycles, particularly information technology and artificial intelligence-related companies. Regulatory developments around derivatives usage and structured products continue to shape product design. Geopolitical tensions and supply-chain dynamics affect earnings trends among major holdings in technology and semiconductors. Broader sector risks include valuation compression in high-growth areas and potential shifts in monetary policy that could alter risk appetite across leveraged and accelerated strategies.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, the daily-reset structure of SPXL and TQQQ has produced amplified moves relative to their benchmarks, with TQQQ exhibiting greater volatility due to its concentrated technology exposure. XDSQ has displayed more contained drawdowns within quarterly periods thanks to its outcome framework, though capped upside may limit participation in strong rallies. Performance differences stem from benchmark selection—broad-market versus tech-centric—as well as leverage mechanics versus structured participation. Concentration risk is highest in TQQQ, while SPXL offers broader diversification within a leveraged wrapper and XDSQ balances asymmetry with defined parameters. Sensitivity to macro factors such as interest rates and growth expectations remains elevated across all three due to their equity and leverage characteristics.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Visit the AI Screener to explore current opportunities.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural characteristics, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign the highest probabilistic favorability to SPXL. Its combination of broad S&P 500 diversification, established daily-reset leverage framework, and competitive expense ratio provides a balanced risk-adjusted profile relative to the more concentrated TQQQ and the capped-outcome mechanics of XDSQ. This positioning reflects stronger momentum stability and cost efficiency within the current large-cap environment.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TQQQ has more net assets: 34B vs. SPXL (6.18B) and XDSQ (68.3M). TQQQ has a higher annual dividend yield than SPXL and XDSQ: TQQQ (38.790) vs SPXL (19.297) and XDSQ (2.523). SPXL was incepted earlier than TQQQ and XDSQ: SPXL (18 years) vs TQQQ (16 years) and XDSQ (5 years). XDSQ (0.79) and TQQQ (0.82) has a lower expense ratio than SPXL (0.84). SPXL has a higher turnover TQQQ (25.00) and XDSQ () vs TQQQ (25.00) and XDSQ ().
SPXLTQQQXDSQ
Gain YTD19.29738.7902.523
Net Assets6.18B34B68.3M
Total Expense Ratio0.840.820.79
Turnover71.0025.00N/A
Yield0.520.370.00
Fund Existence18 years16 years5 years
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SPXLTQQQXDSQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SPXL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TQQQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XDSQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HTAX24.69-0.09
-0.35%
Macquarie National High-Yield Municipal Bond ETF
ISVL51.35-0.82
-1.57%
iShares Intl Dev Sm Cp Val Fctr ETF
AGQI17.80-0.47
-2.56%
First Trust Active Gbl Qual Inc ETF
CHAT90.65-9.58
-9.56%
Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF
SMCY7.18-0.76
-9.57%
YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF

TQQQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TQQQ has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TQQQ jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TQQQ
1D Price
Change %
TQQQ100%
-14.28%
LRCX - TQQQ
71%
Closely correlated
-9.85%
NVDA - TQQQ
68%
Closely correlated
-6.20%
KLAC - TQQQ
67%
Closely correlated
-9.47%
AMAT - TQQQ
67%
Closely correlated
-9.71%
ASML - TQQQ
66%
Loosely correlated
-6.59%
More