Omada Health, Inc. (OMDA), the South San Francisco-based provider of virtual-first care for cardiometabolic and related chronic conditions, saw its shares plunge in Thursday's session following its third-quarter earnings report. The stock was down approximately 17.89%, trading near $15.56 after closing the prior session at $18.95 — a decline of roughly $3.39 per share. The move came even though the company reported better-than-expected results and raised its full-year outlook, as markets focused instead on a softer near-term setup and slowing growth momentum.
The headline numbers were strong. OMDA reported third-quarter revenue of $91.3 million, up 34% year over year and ahead of the roughly $85.7 million consensus. Adjusted earnings of $0.10 per share topped the $0.09 estimate, GAAP gross margin jumped to 76% from 66% a year earlier, and adjusted EBITDA reached a quarterly record of $12 million. Management raised full-year 2026 revenue guidance to $344 million–$346 million and adjusted EBITDA guidance to $32 million–$34 million, marking its third guidance increase of the year.
Despite the beat, the market reaction turned sharply negative. The fourth-quarter outlook implied revenue below the third-quarter level and a slight sequential dip in total members, reflecting normal holiday-season enrollment patterns. Growth is also visibly decelerating: revenue growth cooled to 34% from 43% in the second quarter, and member growth slowed to 36% from 45%. Investors interpreted the softer fourth-quarter guide and the normalizing top-line trajectory as a signal that the exceptional first-half momentum may be fading.
Concerns extended beyond the immediate quarter. Management cited GLP-1 coverage uncertainty and rising healthcare costs as factors extending the selling season deeper into the fourth quarter, and it declined to quantify 2027 covered lives or GLP-1 FlexCare signups. With reports pointing to declining employer GLP-1 coverage heading into 2027, the lack of near-term visibility on next year's pipeline weighed on sentiment, overshadowing the company's record profitability.
The decline was amplified by broader market conditions. The Nasdaq was under pressure following an AI-led selloff, and the healthcare sector traded modestly lower — but OMDA fell far more sharply than peers, indicating a stock-specific reaction to its guidance rather than a purely macro-driven move. Trading activity was elevated, with unusual options volume reported as investors positioned around the earnings event and the company's forward outlook.
Looking ahead, several catalysts will shape OMDA's trajectory. The HCSC fully insured expansion — adding an estimated 1.5 million covered lives across three states — is scheduled to launch January 1, 2027, the same day Wei-Li Shao becomes chief executive with co-founder Sean Duffy moving to executive chairman. Fourth-quarter results will test whether enrollment seasonality and increased R&D and care-team staffing align with the raised full-year range. Risks include the extended selling season, potential pricing pressure from outcome-based performance guarantees, and ongoing uncertainty around employer GLP-1 coverage into 2027.
Tickeron offers hundreds of AI-powered trading bots covering thousands of tickers, but only the strongest performers under current market conditions are featured in the curated Trending AI Robots section. These bots vary by strategy, timeframe, performance metrics, and traded symbols, giving traders a way to monitor automated signals across different market regimes. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to see which strategies are currently leading the field.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
OMDA saw its Momentum Indicator move below the 0 level on November 02, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new downward move. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 20 similar instances where the indicator turned negative. In 17 of the 20 cases, the stock moved further down in the following days. The odds of a decline are at 85%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for OMDA turned negative on November 06, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 10 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 7 of the 10 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 70%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where OMDA declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 75%.
The Aroon Indicator for OMDA entered a downward trend on November 10, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The RSI Indicator demonstrates that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 2 days, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 1 day, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
Following a +8.85% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where OMDA advanced for three days, in 74 of 89 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 83%.
OMDA may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 65 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (3.655) is normal, around the industry mean (4.477). P/E Ratio (22.522) is within average values for comparable stocks, (13.414). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (2.133). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.011) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.908) is also within normal values, averaging (6.065).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 80 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. OMDA’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 84 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 89 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. OMDA’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 96, placing this stock worse than average.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Industry ServicestotheHealthIndustry