GET DAILY SIGNALSCRWD vs ZS: CrowdStrike's Stronger Momentum Over Zscaler in 2026
Key Takeaways
- CRWD has been the stronger performer in 2026, more than doubling year to date on accelerating demand for AI-native cybersecurity, while ZS has been roughly flat amid concerns about slowing growth.
- Tickeron AI Verdict: Based on trend consistency, stability, and catalyst momentum, Tickeron's AI currently favors CRWD over ZS.
- The two companies compete in cybersecurity but with distinct models: CrowdStrike leads in endpoint and extended platform security, while Zscaler anchors its business in cloud-native Zero Trust and SASE (Secure Access Service Edge) architecture.
- Analyst sentiment skews more bullish for CRWD, while ZS faces a more mixed outlook after guiding for revenue growth deceleration.
- ZS trades at a lower valuation multiple, but that discount is paired with slower projected growth and elevated capital spending.
- Explore deeper context through CRWD Major News and CRWD Today's Price Move, as well as ZS Major News and ZS Today's Price Move, to track the latest developments for each ticker.
- For an automated perspective on market positioning, explore Trending AI Robots.
Setting the Stage for Two Cybersecurity Leaders
CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) and Zscaler (ZS) remain two of the most closely watched names in the cybersecurity software sector. Both are tied to the same broad theme of rising security spending as artificial intelligence expands the attack surface, yet their performance has diverged sharply over the past year. This comparison matters for growth-oriented investors assessing how two leaders in adjacent security categories differ in business model, momentum, and risk profile. With trajectories that have split noticeably in 2026, a side-by-side look at recent activity, catalysts, and positioning can clarify which name shows the more favorable setup right now.
CRWD Overview and Recent Performance
CrowdStrike Holdings runs a cloud-delivered security platform called Falcon that covers endpoint protection, identity security, cloud security, and extended detection and response. The stock has been among the stronger performers in the sector lately, more than doubling year to date in 2026. Sentiment has improved on a series of AI-focused moves, including the launch of an "AI kill switch" for halting misbehaving AI agents and deals to acquire two AI security startups, Fiddler AI and Dreadnode, for about $495 million combined. Recent activity also includes expanded partnerships with Nvidia, CoreWeave, and Deloitte that reinforce its place in AI-driven security. Analysts have been constructive, with Deutsche Bank upgrading the shares and pointing to a larger total addressable market, alongside a broad consensus of Strong Buy. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.
ZS Overview and Recent Performance
Zscaler provides cloud security built around a Zero Trust model that verifies every access request rather than assuming trust. Its main product, the Zero Trust Exchange, delivers SASE capabilities across users, workloads, and branches. Performance has been more uneven. The company delivered solid quarterly results with revenue up roughly 25% year over year, but shares fell after management guided for revenue and ARR growth to slow to about 16–17% in the next fiscal year. That outlook, along with higher capital spending on AI and reported leadership shifts, has left sentiment mixed. Shares have rebounded over the past three months, yet the stock stays roughly flat for the year and trails many peers.
Head-to-Head Comparison
While both sell security software, their models differ in key ways. CrowdStrike acts as a platform consolidator, monetizing a wide suite of modules through Falcon subscriptions and moving into AI agent security via acquisitions. Zscaler stays more focused on Zero Trust network architecture, where it leads its category but competes with larger platform vendors. This shows up in growth and valuation: CrowdStrike is expanding revenue in the mid-20% range with building momentum and a premium valuation, while Zscaler is guiding for high-teens growth, a lower price-to-sales multiple, and thinner near-term profitability. Risk profiles also vary. CrowdStrike’s higher valuation leaves less margin for error, whereas Zscaler faces execution questions around sales leadership, slowing net new ARR, and rising capital expenditure. Market sentiment has favored CrowdStrike with steady upgrades and clear AI catalysts, while Zscaler has seen sharper swings.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Looking at trend consistency, relative stability, and the strength of recent catalysts, Tickeron's AI currently leans toward CRWD as the favored name here. The framework emphasizes CrowdStrike’s more durable upward path, broader platform momentum, and steadier stream of positive AI developments, compared with Zscaler’s higher volatility and ongoing questions about growth slowdown. This remains a probabilistic view rather than a firm prediction. ZS still holds a solid long-term position in Zero Trust security and a relatively lower valuation that could support a re-rating if growth stabilizes. Even so, based on observable factors today, the AI-driven approach gives the edge to CRWD.
Exploring Automated Strategies with Tickeron
One resource I turn to when comparing names like these is Tickeron’s AI Trading Bots. The platform runs hundreds of automated strategies across thousands of tickers, and the Trending AI Robots section surfaces those best aligned with current conditions. It offers a range of styles, time horizons, and performance data, giving a practical way to review systematic approaches without committing to one method. For investors tracking cybersecurity names, it can highlight which bots are active in the space right now.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
ZS saw its Stochastic Oscillator peaks and leaves the overbought zone
The Stochastic Oscillator for ZS moved out of overbought territory on October 30, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock and investors may want to consider selling or taking a defensive position. A.I.dvisor looked at 52 similar instances where the indicator exited the overbought zone. In 42 of the 52 cases the stock moved lower. This puts the odds of a downward move at 81%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The 10-day RSI Indicator for ZS moved out of overbought territory on October 29, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 36 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 29 of the 36 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 81%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for ZS turned negative on November 02, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 46 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 35 of the 46 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 76%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where ZS declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 81%.
ZS broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 23, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 08, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on ZS as a result. In 68 of 79 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 86%.
Following a +9.54% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where ZS advanced for three days, in 260 of 345 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 75%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 182 of 230 cases where ZS Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 79%.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 3 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (14.126) is normal, around the industry mean (16.526). ZS has a moderately low P/E Ratio (-577.154) as compared to the industry average of (57.809). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (2.043) is also within normal values, averaging (3.648). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.287) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (9.158) is also within normal values, averaging (103.889).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 37 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. ZS’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 92 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 96 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. ZS’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 91, placing this stock worse than average.
Notable companies
Industry description
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Advertisement
General Information
an antivirus & cloud security platform
Industry ComputerCommunications
Advertisement