D-Wave Quantum Inc is in the development and delivery of quantum computing systems, software, and services, and it is the commercial supplier of quantum computers and the only company building both annealing quantum computers and gate-model quantum computers... Show more
D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) occupies a distinctive niche in the emerging quantum computing market as the only company offering both quantum annealing and gate-model systems. Its annealing platform, led by the Advantage2 system and Leap cloud service, is already commercially deployed for optimization problems such as scheduling, routing, and resource allocation. This near-term revenue engine is complemented by an expanding gate-model roadmap, strengthened by the January 2026 acquisition of Quantum Circuits (QCI), which brought dual-rail qubit technology with built-in error detection.
Management estimates the total addressable market could reach $450–850 billion by 2040, with gate-based systems representing roughly 75% of that opportunity. By pursuing both modalities, D-Wave aims to serve the broadest possible customer base—from enterprises solving optimization tasks today to organizations that will eventually demand fault-tolerant, general-purpose quantum machines. This dual approach differentiates D-Wave from pure annealing specialists and from gate-model-first peers such as IonQ, Rigetti, and the newly public Quantinuum, while also exposing it to competition from resource-rich incumbents like IBM.
The most consequential near-term catalyst is the delivery of D-Wave's first gate-based systems. The company targets a 17-qubit system by the end of 2026, followed by a 49-qubit system in 2027 and a 181-qubit system in 2028 that could demonstrate its first error-corrected logical qubits. Hitting the 2026 milestone on schedule would materially de-risk the roadmap and could reshape investor sentiment.
Revenue conversion is equally important. D-Wave has reiterated plans for at least two system sales in 2026, both expected in the December quarter, alongside continued growth in its Quantum Computing as a Service (QCaaS) business. Record bookings and a sharply higher backlog create a "positive bias" to future revenue estimates, according to Benchmark analyst Gary Mobley, but the timing of system delivery, installation, and testing means reported results will remain lumpy.
Analyst activity has turned noticeably more constructive following D-Wave's first Analyst Day in June 2026. Mizuho raised its target to $35 from $29, Rosenblatt reiterated a Buy with a $43 target, Roth MKM lifted its target to $40 from $30, and B. Riley moved to $40 from $36. Consensus remains a Strong Buy, with an average twelve-month price target in the mid-to-high $30s and a spread from $22 to $45, underscoring both optimism and disagreement about how quickly commercial adoption will scale.
Quantum computing sits at the intersection of technology policy, national security, and long-horizon capital allocation, making it unusually sensitive to macroeconomic and geopolitical developments. Interest rates are a direct influence: because quantum companies are valued primarily on future cash flows, higher discount rates compress the present value of those distant earnings. D-Wave's cash position—roughly $588 million following its QCI acquisition—partially insulates it from the need to raise capital, but the sector's high valuations remain sensitive to shifts in risk appetite.
Federal policy is a decisive tailwind. Executive orders signed in June 2026 aim to accelerate U.S. quantum development and mandate a shift to post-quantum cryptography across government by 2030–2031, while the CHIPS and Science Act funding underscores quantum's status as a national priority. These measures could broaden procurement pathways for D-Wave and validate its dual-platform strategy. At the same time, dependence on a small number of large, lumpy government and system contracts leaves revenue volatile from quarter to quarter.
The Trend Prediction Engine is an AI-powered forecasting tool that helps traders identify whether a stock, exchange-traded fund (ETF), or other asset may move bullish, bearish, or sideways over the next week or month. It is designed to help users spot developing trends, evaluate possible breakouts or reversals, and explore predictions across a wide range of tradable instruments. The product includes searchable prediction categories, historical context, and alert-oriented functionality, allowing investors to monitor shifting momentum alongside their own research. For those tracking high-volatility names such as QBTS, tools like the Trend Prediction Engine can add a data-driven layer to forward-looking analysis.
The defining theme for 2026 and beyond is whether D-Wave can graduate from a technology story to a scalable commercial business. Near-term revenue visibility is improving—Benchmark projects growth from roughly $43 million in 2026 to $86 million in 2027 and $143 million in 2028—but the company is expected to remain deeply unprofitable, with adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) losses exceeding $130 million in 2026.
Margin trajectory will be a central focus. Management targets long-term gross margins of 65–75%, with 40–50% for professional services and 75–90% for QCaaS systems, and estimates each cloud system can generate $25–30 million in annual revenue. Reaching those levels depends on scaling recurring QCaaS subscriptions to smooth out the lumpiness of hardware sales.
Longer term, the roadmap toward 10 logical qubits by 2030 and 100 by 2032 represents the path to fault-tolerant quantum algorithms and applications in quantum chemistry and quantum AI. Competitive pressure from IBM and Quantinuum, which are better funded, means D-Wave must sustain a rapid innovation cadence while conserving cash. Capital allocation priorities—balancing R&D, sales coverage, and system installation—will determine whether the company can convert its technological lead and record backlog into durable growth. Consensus expectations remain bullish, but the valuation already embeds years of unproven execution.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| CRYPTO / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MOB.X | 0.075924 | 0.002817 | +3.85% |
| MobileCoin cryptocurrency | |||
| BETH.X | 2493.124500 | 53.606445 | +2.20% |
| Beacon ETH cryptocurrency | |||
| FTHB | 25.22 | N/A | N/A |
| FIS Faith Income ETF | |||
| ALT.X | 0.006200 | -0.000066 | -1.06% |
| Altlayer cryptocurrency | |||
| VANRY.X | 0.000680 | -0.000035 | -4.92% |
| Vanar Chain cryptocurrency | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QBTS has been closely correlated with RGTI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QBTS jumps, then RGTI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QBTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QBTS | 100% | -5.08% | ||
| RGTI - QBTS | 89% Closely correlated | -5.17% | ||
| QUBT - QBTS | 83% Closely correlated | -5.78% | ||
| IONQ - QBTS | 81% Closely correlated | -7.68% | ||
| CAN - QBTS | 48% Loosely correlated | -14.22% | ||
| DPRO - QBTS | 48% Loosely correlated | +2.17% | ||
More | ||||
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QBTS | 1D Price Change % |
|---|---|---|
| QBTS | 100% | -5.08% |
| QBTS (4 stocks) | 77% Closely correlated | -5.93% |
| Computer Processing Hardware (40 stocks) | 46% Loosely correlated | -3.24% |
The RSI Oscillator for QBTS moved out of oversold territory on July 27, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 25 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In of the 25 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at .
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 2 days, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
Following a 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where QBTS advanced for three days, in of 191 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
QBTS may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In of 140 cases where QBTS Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are .
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on August 18, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on QBTS as a result. In of 65 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for QBTS turned negative on August 24, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 31 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In of the 31 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at .
QBTS moved below its 50-day moving average on August 17, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where QBTS declined for three days, the price rose further in of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. QBTS’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (5.841) is normal, around the industry mean (8.263). P/E Ratio (0.000) is within average values for comparable stocks, (38.762). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (4.542). QBTS has a moderately low Dividend Yield (0.000) as compared to the industry average of (0.016). QBTS's P/S Ratio (500.000) is very high in comparison to the industry average of (56.133).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. QBTS’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 87, placing this stock worse than average.