Daqo New Energy is one of the world's lowest-cost producers of high-purity polysilicon, the essential raw material for solar photovoltaic (PV) cells. Its results serve as a key indicator for the solar supply chain, where prolonged oversupply has pushed prices below production costs for many players. The third quarter of 2026 appears to mark a potential inflection: Chinese policy measures aimed at curbing below-cost selling helped N-type polysilicon prices stabilize and begin to recover. In that environment, Daqo moved from a cautious sales approach to a more aggressive, market-oriented strategy, which lifted volumes meaningfully. I am watching closely to see whether recovering prices, lower costs, and stronger sales momentum can continue to narrow losses and eventually support a return to profitability.
For the third quarter ended September 30, 2026, Daqo New Energy reported revenue of $194.2 million, up from $62.7 million in the second quarter but down from $244.6 million a year earlier. The sequential increase reflected higher sales volumes after the company resumed normal activity, with external sales rising to 46,910 MT from 15,190 MT in the previous quarter. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to compare the results against industry peers.
The company recorded a gross loss of $60.6 million, narrower than the $82.7 million loss in the second quarter, while gross margin improved to negative 31.2% from negative 132.0%. This improvement came from a 2% sequential rise in average selling price to $4.12 per kilogram, lower production costs, and reduced inventory impairment provisions of $30.9 million versus $55.7 million previously. Average total production cost fell 9.7% sequentially to a record-low $5.37 per kilogram, and cash cost declined 7.4% to $4.23 per kilogram.
Net loss attributable to shareholders was $52.9 million, or $0.78 per basic ADS, compared with a loss of $81.2 million, or $1.20 per ADS, in the prior quarter. On a per-share basis, the loss exceeded the consensus estimate of roughly $0.49 per ADS, even as revenue surpassed expectations. Adjusted net loss, excluding non-cash share-based compensation, remained $52.9 million. EBITDA improved to negative $9.2 million from negative $29.0 million sequentially.
Shares of Daqo New Energy moved higher following the report. The strong sequential revenue beat and narrower losses suggest the most severe phase of the polysilicon downturn may be easing. Sentiment has turned cautiously more positive as Chinese regulators increased enforcement of price-compliance rules and industry anti-involution measures helped stabilize N-type prices from their second-quarter lows. Investors remain aware of elevated industry inventories and softer near-term demand, which continue to keep selling prices below full production costs. The company’s zero-debt balance sheet and approximately $2.06 billion in readily convertible assets provide a solid buffer through the cycle.
Daqo guided for fourth-quarter 2026 polysilicon production of approximately 35,000–45,000 MT and full-year 2026 output of 175,000–185,000 MT. This reflects a deliberate reduction in utilization rates to better match demand and support inventory destocking across the industry. The measured approach indicates management is prioritizing price recovery and inventory normalization over maximizing volume.
Investors will focus on whether polysilicon prices continue to move toward production-cost levels, which would represent the clearest route back to positive gross margins. Cost control remains another important factor, with further reductions and stable costs expected into 2027. Downstream purchasing patterns and the speed of industry-wide inventory drawdown will also be closely watched.
Outside its core operations, Daqo is expanding into power infrastructure for artificial intelligence data centers, including energy storage systems and solid-state transformers, with sales anticipated to begin in 2027. While still early, this diversification could help reduce reliance on solar-sector cyclicality over time.
In my own research process, I often turn to Tickeron’s AI Screener to quickly filter stocks by fundamentals, technical patterns, and sector trends. It allows me to compare names like Daqo New Energy against peers and spot potential ideas more efficiently than manual reviews. The tool has been particularly useful for monitoring cyclical sectors where conditions can shift rapidly.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.
DQ saw its Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) turn negative on October 16, 2026. This is a bearish signal that suggests the stock could decline going forward. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 54 instances where the indicator turned negative. In 50 of the 54 cases the stock moved lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a downward move at 90%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 13, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on DQ as a result. In 77 of 89 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 87%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where DQ declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 88%.
The Aroon Indicator for DQ entered a downward trend on October 26, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where DQ's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 30 of 38 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 79%.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 8 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +0.73% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where DQ advanced for three days, in 181 of 252 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 72%.
DQ may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 20 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.156) is normal, around the industry mean (6.363). P/E Ratio (-3.547) is within average values for comparable stocks, (89.427). DQ's Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.020) is slightly lower than the industry average of (0.832). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.008) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.377) is also within normal values, averaging (27.093).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 23 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 83 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. DQ’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 92 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. DQ’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 74, placing this stock worse than average.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
a manufacturer of polysilicon products
Industry ElectronicProductionEquipment