Go to the list of all blogs
Jimmy Landsman's Avatar
published in Blogs
Aug 16, 2026
TickeronGET DAILY SIGNALS
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares (TSLL) Drops -28% in 30 Days: Tesla Weakness Weighs on the Leveraged Fund

Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares (TSLL) Drops -28% in 30 Days: Tesla Weakness Weighs on the Leveraged Fund

Key Takeaways

  • 30-day ETF performance: TSLL declined approximately 28%, falling from $12.22 on July 15 to $8.76 on August 14, as leveraged daily exposure amplified losses in Tesla.
  • Quarterly trend: The fund is down roughly 47% from the May 14 close of $16.65, extending a volatile multi-month drawdown.
  • Primary catalyst: Tesla's second-quarter results, released after the market close on July 22, beat on revenue and deliveries but missed on profitability, triggering a one-day Tesla decline of about 14.5%.
  • Most influential holding: Tesla is effectively the entire equity exposure; the fund's Treasury collateral and total-return swaps exist primarily to deliver the leveraged daily return.
  • Structural consideration: Because TSLL resets leverage daily, compounding in a downward-trending market can make multi-day losses larger than a simple 2x multiple of Tesla's cumulative move.

Overview of the TSLL ETF and Its Holdings

Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares is a leveraged single-stock ETF launched in August 2022. It aims for daily results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of Tesla's daily performance. Under normal conditions, it invests at least 80% of net assets in Tesla securities and instruments such as total-return swaps and options to achieve that exposure.

The portfolio is non-diversified, typically holding 12 to 14 positions. The largest holdings are usually Treasury and government money-market instruments serving as collateral, including Goldman Sachs Financial Square Treasury Instruments, Dreyfus Treasury Securities Cash Management, and JPMorgan U.S. Treasury securities. Tesla shares and swaps provide the equity exposure, resulting in effectively 100% consumer discretionary sector concentration in one issuer. The fund has a net expense ratio of 0.83% and manages around $5 billion in assets. Because it targets daily multiples rather than longer-term ones, performance over weeks or months depends on the path of returns and can diverge from a simple 2x multiple of Tesla's cumulative move, particularly in volatile conditions. I also checked the holdings breakdown using Tickeron’s AI Screener to confirm the concentration details.

TSLL Price Performance Over the Last 30 Days and Quarter

Using adjusted closing prices, TSLL moved from $12.22 on July 15 to $8.76 on August 14, a decline of approximately 28% over the 30-day period. The drop was not gradual—the fund traded near $11 in late July before gapping lower in one session and then oscillating between roughly $6.70 and $8.80 into mid-August.

The quarterly picture is even weaker. From the May 14 close of $16.65 to the August 14 close of $8.76, TSLL fell about 47%. The pattern featured strength in May, choppiness in June, and a sharp decline after the July earnings release, reflecting a trend-driven, high-volatility selloff rather than a range-bound market. From what I see in the price action, the daily reset mechanism played a clear role in amplifying the move.

Key Drivers of the 30-Day Decline

The main driver was Tesla’s second-quarter 2026 earnings report. Tesla posted record quarterly deliveries of about 480,000 vehicles and revenue of $28.24 billion, both above consensus. However, adjusted EPS came in at $0.33 versus the roughly $0.51 expected, operating income fell 57% year over year to $398 million, and automotive gross margin narrowed to about 16.9% from 21.1% in the prior quarter. Free cash flow turned negative at approximately -$1.09 billion as capital expenditures more than doubled, and regulatory-credit revenue declined by about two-thirds.

Investors focused more on the margin and cash-flow issues than the delivery beat. Tesla shares fell roughly 14.5% the next session, and TSLL, targeting 200% of the daily move, declined about 29% in that single day. Elevated volume during the selloff pointed to repositioning, and some sell-side analysts lowered price targets. The fund’s daily reset then compounded losses during subsequent weakness. I reviewed comparable leveraged vehicles with Tickeron’s AI Pattern Search Engine to put the move in broader context.

Factors Behind the Quarterly Performance

Over the three-month window, the broader story involves a repricing of Tesla’s profit growth expectations amid elevated investment spending. Revenue and delivery momentum recovered, yet lower average selling prices, a mix shift toward lower-priced models, the end of higher-priced Model S and Model X production, reduced regulatory-credit income, and heavy spending on AI, robotaxi, and robotics initiatives all pressured margins. Management guided to more than $25 billion in 2026 capital expenditures, keeping free cash flow under pressure.

Macro factors added to the pressure: ongoing interest-rate uncertainty and softer consumer-discretionary sentiment weighed on long-duration growth stocks, while electric-vehicle competition kept pricing aggressive. For a leveraged single-stock fund, these company-specific and sector headwinds produced outsized downside, with the daily reset mechanism magnifying losses across multiple sessions.

Outlook and What to Watch Next

The main factors likely to shape TSLL going forward are the same ones affecting Tesla. Key items include whether automotive gross margins stabilize, whether capital spending begins to generate clearer revenue visibility in AI, robotaxi, and robotics, and whether free cash flow returns to positive territory. Delivery growth, average selling prices, regulatory-credit income, and energy-storage margins remain important operating metrics.

At the macro level, interest-rate expectations, inflation data, consumer spending, and auto financing conditions will influence the broader backdrop. For TSLL specifically, volatility and the daily reset remain central risks: the fund is built for short-term tactical use, and holding periods longer than one day can produce results that differ materially from twice Tesla’s cumulative performance. Policy changes affecting electric-vehicle incentives, trade, and technology regulation could also shift sentiment. These themes, rather than any single data point, are likely to define the fund’s risk-reward profile ahead.

AI-Powered Screening in My Research Workflow

In my analysis of leveraged products like this one, I frequently use Tickeron’s AI Screener to scan for similar vehicles, compare technical and fundamental metrics, and monitor volatility patterns across the sector. It helps surface relevant candidates quickly without manual sorting, which is especially useful when evaluating concentrated or path-dependent instruments. Explore the AI Screener to refine searches across sectors and strategies.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Related Ticker: TSLL

Contributor

My name is Jimmy, and I’m a financial analyst focused on identifying compelling opportunities across the ETF market. Each day, I analyze hundreds of ETFs to uncover potential trading and investment opportunities using a broad range of market factors. For short-term trading, I rely heavily on technical analysis, including price channels, momentum indicators, support and resistance levels, trend patterns, and other market signals. At the same time, I dedicate significant attention to evaluating ETFs from a long-term investment perspective. My objective is to build a well-balanced ETF portfolio that combines core investment holdings with more tactical and speculative positions. The goal is to create a portfolio that can participate effectively in market rallies while also remaining resilient during periods of volatility and market corrections.


TSLL's RSI Indicator climbs out of oversold territory

The RSI Indicator for TSLL moved out of oversold territory on November 06, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 23 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 21 of the 23 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 44 of 48 cases where TSLL's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

TSLL moved above its 50-day moving average on November 11, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.

Following a +6.76% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where TSLL advanced for three days, in 254 of 267 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

TSLL may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 187 of 197 cases where TSLL Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 90%.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 04, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on TSLL as a result. In 67 of 70 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for TSLL turned negative on November 05, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 37 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 36 of the 37 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 90%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where TSLL declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.

Notable companies

The most notable companies in this group are Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA).

Industry description

The investment seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 200% of the daily performance of TSLA. The fund, under normal circumstances, invests at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in the securities of TSLA and financial instruments, such as swap agreements and options, that provide leveraged exposure to TSLA. The fund is non-diversified.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF (TSLL) ETF was 0%. For the same ETF, the average monthly price growth was 3%, and the average quarterly price growth was -30%. TSLA experienced the highest price growth at 1%, while TSLA experienced the biggest fall at 1%.
1-on-1 3
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
Interact to see
Advertisement
AtlasClear Holdings (ATCH) shares fell roughly 25.5% over the last 30 days, declining from $0.1881 on October 2 to $0.1401 on October 30. The pullback extended a longer downtrend that has kept the stock trading well below the $1.00 NYSE American minimum, keeping continued listing-compliance risk in focus.
The $1.14 central target is not an analyst consensus; it is the all-cash merger consideration in GoPro, Inc. (GPRO) 's pending deal with Starman Optical, agreed in September 2026. With the stock trading near $0.88, reaching $1.14 would require a move of roughly 29.5%.
The central target of $1,620 is the arithmetic mean of verified, current analyst price targets, rounded to a clean level; it is not a single firm's forecast or a guarantee. At a recent price of about $690 , reaching $1,620 would require a gain of roughly 135% , a very large move by any standard.
NVDA fell -2.10% to $216.66 during regular trading, down from a prior close of $221.30. Primary catalyst: hotter-than-expected September CPI data reignited Fed rate-hike fears, raising borrowing costs for AI infrastructure buildouts.
Nebius Group N.V. is expected to report third-quarter 2026 results in early November, following a second quarter in which revenue surged 454% year over year. Wall Street consensus tracked by Benzinga points to roughly $937 million in Q3 2026 revenue, up from $146.1 million in the year-ago quarter.