Go to the list of all blogs
Sergey Savastiouk's Avatar
published in Blogs
Sep 01, 2026
Energy Transfer (ET): Targeting a +40% Move to $30

Energy Transfer (ET): Targeting a +40% Move to $30

Key Takeaways

  • Energy Transfer LP (ET) recently traded around $21.50, near the top of its 52-week range, making a $30 unit price roughly a 40% move higher.
  • The strongest bullish case rests on a reacceleration in earnings growth, a multi-billion-dollar backlog of pipeline expansion projects, and rising natural gas demand tied to data centers and power generation.
  • ET remains one of the more heavily leveraged midstream operators, exposing it to interest-rate sensitivity and commodity-price swings.
  • Consensus analyst price targets cluster near $23–$24, below the $30 objective, which would require meaningful valuation expansion as well as earnings growth.
  • At current levels, $30 appears achievable over a multi-year horizon but depends on sustained double-digit earnings growth and a re-rating of the units.

Why the $30 Target Stands Out

The idea of Energy Transfer reaching $30 has come up often in financial discussions, mainly because the units have climbed notably yet still trade at a discount to many midstream peers. From a recent price near $21.50, a move to $30 would mean an increase of roughly 40%, placing the goal beyond any near-term expectation but well within the realm of a patient, multi-year approach. That gap makes $30 a concrete and frequently referenced benchmark rather than a random number.

Energy Transfer LP Overview

Energy Transfer LP is a Dallas-based master limited partnership (MLP), a publicly traded structure that passes most of its income directly to unitholders and generally issues a Schedule K-1 tax form. The company operates one of the largest and most diversified midstream networks in the United States, spanning more than 20,000 miles of interstate natural gas pipelines, additional intrastate lines, crude oil and natural gas liquids (NGL) pipelines, storage, fractionation, and terminalling assets. Because most of its revenue is fee-based, its cash flows are less directly exposed to daily commodity prices than exploration and production companies, though energy prices still shape producer activity and demand. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.

Factors That Could Push ET Toward $30

The main case for a higher price starts with earnings momentum. After a comparatively slow year in which adjusted EBITDA grew only about 3%, management guided to more than 10% growth in the following year, driven by the completion and ramp-up of major projects and improved oil and gas prices. That reacceleration matters because ET had previously delivered a roughly 10% compound annual growth rate. Beyond current projects, the company holds a substantial expansion backlog. Notable examples include the Hugh Brinson Pipeline and the large Transwestern Pipeline expansion, with secured projects expected to enter service through the rest of the decade. Perhaps most importantly for the longer-term story, the rapid build-out of data centers and rising electricity demand have made natural gas infrastructure a strategic bottleneck, creating additional expansion and acquisition opportunities for operators like Energy Transfer. Valuation also plays a central role. ET has historically traded below its peer group on a forward earnings basis, and any narrowing of that discount would multiply the effect of earnings growth. Combined with a distribution yield in the mid-single digits, the total-return case for patient investors remains a key part of the bull argument.

Potential Roadblocks for ET

Several obstacles stand between the current price and $30. First, Energy Transfer carries a meaningful debt load, a structural feature of capital-intensive pipeline businesses. That leverage makes the cost of capital and the direction of interest rates unusually important; sustained higher rates can pressure cash available for distributions and growth. Second, although most revenue is fee-based, a prolonged downturn in energy prices could reduce producer volumes and weaken demand for transport and storage capacity. Third, large midstream projects face permitting, regulatory, and execution risks that can delay earnings contributions. Finally, MLPs carry tax-reporting complexity that can deter some investors and keep the investor base narrower than for conventional stocks.

Analyst Targets and Technical Levels

Published analyst price targets for ET generally fall short of $30. Consensus estimates cluster near the low-to-mid $20s, with individual targets ranging from roughly the low $20s to the upper $20s in some cases. That gap is important: reaching $30 would require not only meeting growth forecasts but also convincing the market to pay a richer multiple than it currently does. From a technical standpoint, ET has been trading near multi-year highs after a powerful advance from the low teens, so the units sit above long-term moving averages and in an overall uptrend. The recent highs serve as the first resistance zone, while prior breakout levels provide nearby support. A sustained push toward $30 would likely unfold in stages, requiring the units to first hold gains above current record territory before testing the next psychological milestones.

Final Assessment

A $30 unit price for Energy Transfer is plausible but not imminent. The combination of accelerating earnings growth, a deep pipeline of expansion projects, and structural natural gas demand from power and data centers provides a credible path higher over a multi-year timeframe. However, the level sits above most analyst targets, meaning it would likely require both continued double-digit earnings growth and an expansion of the valuation multiple. Investors should watch project completion timelines, the pace of data-center and power demand, commodity price trends, and the distribution, while keeping leverage and interest-rate exposure in mind. One thing that stands out is how these elements could interact over time.

Leveraging AI Daily Buy/Sell Signals for ET

For investors monitoring whether ET can sustain its upward trajectory, I find AI Daily Buy/Sell Signals from Tickeron a practical addition to the process. It uses artificial intelligence to track thousands of stocks and ETFs, delivering Buy, Sell, or Hold signals based on market conditions and technical factors. This helps me stay on top of shifts without relying solely on manual reviews.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Related Ticker: ET

Contributor

Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.


Aroon Indicator for ET shows an upward move is likely

ET's Aroon Indicator triggered a bullish signal on September 04, 2026. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor detected that the AroonUp green line is above 70 while the AroonDown red line is below 30. When the up indicator moves above 70 and the down indicator remains below 30, it is a sign that the stock could be setting up for a bullish move. Traders may want to buy the stock or look to buy calls options. A.I.dvisor looked at 315 similar instances where the Aroon Indicator showed a similar pattern. In of the 315 cases, the stock moved higher in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a move higher at .

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on August 06, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on ET as a result. In of 92 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

Following a 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where ET advanced for three days, in of 361 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

Bearish Trend Analysis

The 10-day RSI Indicator for ET moved out of overbought territory on August 19, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 39 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In of the 39 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at .

The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In of 69 cases where ET's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for ET turned negative on September 01, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 54 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In of the 54 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at .

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where ET declined for three days, the price rose further in of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

ET broke above its upper Bollinger Band on August 10, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 40, placing this stock better than average.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.096) is normal, around the industry mean (186.023). P/E Ratio (14.726) is within average values for comparable stocks, (25.047). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.661) is also within normal values, averaging (3.951). Dividend Yield (0.063) settles around the average of (0.048) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.692) is also within normal values, averaging (4.637).

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. ET’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

Notable companies

The most notable companies in this group are Enterprise Products Partners LP (NYSE:EPD), Energy Transfer LP (NYSE:ET), Kinder Morgan (NYSE:KMI), Targa Resources Corp (NYSE:TRGP), Cheniere Energy (NYSE:LNG), Plains All American Pipeline LP (NASDAQ:PAA), Antero Midstream Corp (NYSE:AM), CMB.TECH NV (NYSE:CMBT), Plains GP Holdings LP (NASDAQ:PAGP), Scorpio Tankers (NYSE:STNG).

Industry description

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the Oil & Gas Pipelines Industry is 17.36B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 7.66K to 109.79B. ENB holds the highest valuation in this group at 109.79B. The lowest valued company is AVACF at 7.66K.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the Oil & Gas Pipelines Industry was 1%. For the same Industry, the average monthly price growth was 11%, and the average quarterly price growth was 12%. PXS experienced the highest price growth at 16%, while BANL experienced the biggest fall at -44%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the Oil & Gas Pipelines Industry was 33%. For the same stocks of the Industry, the average monthly volume growth was -16% and the average quarterly volume growth was -17%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating: 24
P/E Growth Rating: 52
Price Growth Rating: 45
SMR Rating: 60
Profit Risk Rating: 39
Seasonality Score: 10 (-100 ... +100)
View a ticker or compare two or three
ET
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
Last 5 trading days
A.I. Advisor
published General Information

General Information

a provider of natural gas pipeline transportation and transmission services

Industry OilGasPipelines

Profile
Details
Industry
Oil And Gas Pipelines
Address
8111 Westchester Drive
Phone
+1 214 981-0700
Employees
13786
Web
https://www.energytransfer.com
Interact to see
Advertisement
Netflix dropped out of a months‑long bidding war for Warner Bros Discovery after Paramount/Skydance raised their offer, and Netflix refused to match it, saying the new price was “no longer financially appealing.” The stock jumped roughly 10%+ on the news as investors read this as fiscal discipline—management chose not to overpay, which protects the balance sheet and future returns instead of chasing scale at any price.
SE shares plunged approximately 23% at Tuesday's open, marking one of the steepest single-session selloffs in recent company history. The primary catalyst was a severe Q4 2025 earnings miss: adjusted EPS of $0.63 fell well short of the analyst consensus of $0.80, a miss of roughly 21%.
Shares of Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) are down 10.32% in Tuesday's session, trading at $196.27 versus the prior close of $218.85 — a single-day loss of $22.58 per share. The primary catalyst is a Bank of America downgrade issued on March 2, cutting SCCO from Neutral to Underperform, which triggered accelerating sell pressure into Tuesday's open.
MDB shares plummeted approximately 26.44% on March 3, 2026, closing around $238.24, down from a prior close of approximately $322.55. The primary catalyst was weaker-than-expected fiscal Q1 2027 guidance, with non-GAAP EPS projected at $1.15–$1.19 versus analyst expectations of roughly $1.46.
Shares of Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) are surging approximately +130% in Tuesday's session, with the stock hitting a fresh 52-week high as of intraday trading on March 3, 2026. The dominant catalyst is a sharp escalation of U.S.-Israel-Iran military tensions, with Tehran restricting access to the Strait of Hormuz — triggering a spike in crude oil futures and a broad-based energy sector rally.
Shares of CRDO dropped 18.55% on March 3, 2026, falling from a prior close of $114.22 to approximately $93.03. The primary catalyst was a "sell the news" reaction to fiscal Q3 2026 earnings — despite beating consensus estimates on both revenue and EPS, the market sold off on forward margin compression guidance.
PSIX shares plummeted approximately 25.37% on March 3, 2026, closing near $64.00 versus the prior session's close of $85.75. The primary catalyst was the company's Q4 and full-year 2025 earnings report, which revealed Q4 net income fell 31% year-over-year to $16.1 million despite a 33% revenue increase.
Life360 Inc Common (LIF) stunned many traders today as the stock slid more than 20% despite reporting what, on the surface, looked like very strong results: revenue up roughly 32% year over year to about $489.5 million and the company’s first-ever full‑year profitability.
StoneCo Ltd. (STNE) shares dropped more than 15% today after the market reacted negatively to the company’s latest Q4 2025 and full‑year results and its updated outlook. While StoneCo delivered year‑over‑year revenue and earnings growth and even topped EPS expectations, investors focused on weaker‑than‑hoped revenue numbers, rising credit risk metrics, and a more cautious medium‑term guidance profile, which together triggered a sharp rerating of the stock.
Alamo Group reported Q4 2025 EPS of about 1.70 dollars, well below analyst expectations that were in the low‑2 dollar range, producing a sizable negative earnings surprise. Quarterly revenue came in around 373.7 million dollars, down roughly 3% year over year and about 7–8% below consensus estimates near 405 million dollars, signaling softer demand than the market anticipated.
Hycroft Mining Holding Corp (HYMC) shares slid more than 12% today as traders digested the company’s newly filed 2025 annual report, a major corporate update, and an extended development timeline that shifts the story further away from near‑term production and cash flow.
PicS (PICS) shares dropped more than 12% today as investors reacted to mounting concerns about valuation, elevated volatility, and uncertainty ahead of the company’s next earnings report later in March.
Shares of MOBX surged approximately +532.77% in the March 3, 2026 trading session, closing at $1.12 versus a prior close of $0.18. The primary catalyst was a major production purchase order from the U.S. Navy for components used in the Tomahawk cruise missile program.
DAKT shares are declining approximately -10% in Wednesday's session, trading near $23.91, compared to the prior close of approximately $26.57. The primary catalyst is the pre-market release of fiscal Q3 2026 earnings, in which diluted EPS of $0.06 fell significantly short of the consensus estimate of approximately $0.13–$0.15.
Shares of HRZN plunged approximately 23% in Wednesday's trading session — one of the steepest single-day declines in the company's recent history. Primary catalyst: Q4 2025 earnings released after the close on March 3 revealed net investment income (NII) per share of just $0.18, badly missing the consensus estimate of $0.26 and marking a steep sequential decline.
Palantir (PLTR) is outperforming a struggling market, rallying strongly over the past few sessions while approaching a critical resistance level near $143. With geopolitical tensions rising and defense analytics demand growing, the stock sits at a pivotal technical moment that could determine its next major move.
Investors holding record levels of protective puts means downside is heavily hedged, which often dampens crash risk but supports higher implied volatility (VIX) in the short run. The fact that the S&P 500 and Nasdaq are rising while hedging is surging suggests a “wall of worry” market: people are bullish enough to stay in, but nervous enough to pay up for insurance.
During the week of 9–15 February 2026, major U.S. equity indices finished lower overall, while Tickeron’s trending AI trading bots produced positive returns, particularly in defense and energy—two areas now directly affected by the newly opened war in Iran. With macro risk rising and volatility picking up, this divergence matters: it shows how sector‑focused, rules‑based AI strategies can still find upside when broad index exposure is negative.
Investors are furiously hedging against a potential credit market crash, just as geopolitical risk explodes with a new war in Iran. Put option open interest on major U.S. credit ETFs like HYG, JNK, LQD, and BKLN has surged to a record ~11.5 million contracts, doubling over the last 12 months and already exceeding the 2022 bear‑market peak of 10 million.
The current gap between single‑stock implied volatility and index volatility is back near October 2008 extremes, signaling that investors expect idiosyncratic risk (stock‑specific jumps) to dominate.