Go to the list of all blogs
Sergey Savastiouk's Avatar
published in Blogs
Sep 01, 2026
Energy Transfer (ET): Targeting a +40% Move to $30

Energy Transfer (ET): Targeting a +40% Move to $30

Key Takeaways

  • Energy Transfer LP (ET) recently traded around $21.50, near the top of its 52-week range, making a $30 unit price roughly a 40% move higher.
  • The strongest bullish case rests on a reacceleration in earnings growth, a multi-billion-dollar backlog of pipeline expansion projects, and rising natural gas demand tied to data centers and power generation.
  • ET remains one of the more heavily leveraged midstream operators, exposing it to interest-rate sensitivity and commodity-price swings.
  • Consensus analyst price targets cluster near $23–$24, below the $30 objective, which would require meaningful valuation expansion as well as earnings growth.
  • At current levels, $30 appears achievable over a multi-year horizon but depends on sustained double-digit earnings growth and a re-rating of the units.

Why the $30 Target Stands Out

The idea of Energy Transfer reaching $30 has come up often in financial discussions, mainly because the units have climbed notably yet still trade at a discount to many midstream peers. From a recent price near $21.50, a move to $30 would mean an increase of roughly 40%, placing the goal beyond any near-term expectation but well within the realm of a patient, multi-year approach. That gap makes $30 a concrete and frequently referenced benchmark rather than a random number.

Energy Transfer LP Overview

Energy Transfer LP is a Dallas-based master limited partnership (MLP), a publicly traded structure that passes most of its income directly to unitholders and generally issues a Schedule K-1 tax form. The company operates one of the largest and most diversified midstream networks in the United States, spanning more than 20,000 miles of interstate natural gas pipelines, additional intrastate lines, crude oil and natural gas liquids (NGL) pipelines, storage, fractionation, and terminalling assets. Because most of its revenue is fee-based, its cash flows are less directly exposed to daily commodity prices than exploration and production companies, though energy prices still shape producer activity and demand. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.

Factors That Could Push ET Toward $30

The main case for a higher price starts with earnings momentum. After a comparatively slow year in which adjusted EBITDA grew only about 3%, management guided to more than 10% growth in the following year, driven by the completion and ramp-up of major projects and improved oil and gas prices. That reacceleration matters because ET had previously delivered a roughly 10% compound annual growth rate. Beyond current projects, the company holds a substantial expansion backlog. Notable examples include the Hugh Brinson Pipeline and the large Transwestern Pipeline expansion, with secured projects expected to enter service through the rest of the decade. Perhaps most importantly for the longer-term story, the rapid build-out of data centers and rising electricity demand have made natural gas infrastructure a strategic bottleneck, creating additional expansion and acquisition opportunities for operators like Energy Transfer. Valuation also plays a central role. ET has historically traded below its peer group on a forward earnings basis, and any narrowing of that discount would multiply the effect of earnings growth. Combined with a distribution yield in the mid-single digits, the total-return case for patient investors remains a key part of the bull argument.

Potential Roadblocks for ET

Several obstacles stand between the current price and $30. First, Energy Transfer carries a meaningful debt load, a structural feature of capital-intensive pipeline businesses. That leverage makes the cost of capital and the direction of interest rates unusually important; sustained higher rates can pressure cash available for distributions and growth. Second, although most revenue is fee-based, a prolonged downturn in energy prices could reduce producer volumes and weaken demand for transport and storage capacity. Third, large midstream projects face permitting, regulatory, and execution risks that can delay earnings contributions. Finally, MLPs carry tax-reporting complexity that can deter some investors and keep the investor base narrower than for conventional stocks.

Analyst Targets and Technical Levels

Published analyst price targets for ET generally fall short of $30. Consensus estimates cluster near the low-to-mid $20s, with individual targets ranging from roughly the low $20s to the upper $20s in some cases. That gap is important: reaching $30 would require not only meeting growth forecasts but also convincing the market to pay a richer multiple than it currently does. From a technical standpoint, ET has been trading near multi-year highs after a powerful advance from the low teens, so the units sit above long-term moving averages and in an overall uptrend. The recent highs serve as the first resistance zone, while prior breakout levels provide nearby support. A sustained push toward $30 would likely unfold in stages, requiring the units to first hold gains above current record territory before testing the next psychological milestones.

Final Assessment

A $30 unit price for Energy Transfer is plausible but not imminent. The combination of accelerating earnings growth, a deep pipeline of expansion projects, and structural natural gas demand from power and data centers provides a credible path higher over a multi-year timeframe. However, the level sits above most analyst targets, meaning it would likely require both continued double-digit earnings growth and an expansion of the valuation multiple. Investors should watch project completion timelines, the pace of data-center and power demand, commodity price trends, and the distribution, while keeping leverage and interest-rate exposure in mind. One thing that stands out is how these elements could interact over time.

Leveraging AI Daily Buy/Sell Signals for ET

For investors monitoring whether ET can sustain its upward trajectory, I find AI Daily Buy/Sell Signals from Tickeron a practical addition to the process. It uses artificial intelligence to track thousands of stocks and ETFs, delivering Buy, Sell, or Hold signals based on market conditions and technical factors. This helps me stay on top of shifts without relying solely on manual reviews.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Related Ticker: ET

Contributor

Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.


Momentum Indicator for ET turns positive, indicating new upward trend

ET saw its Momentum Indicator move above the 0 level on August 06, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new upward move. Traders may want to consider buying the stock or buying call options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 92 similar instances where the indicator turned positive. In of the 92 cases, the stock moved higher in the following days. The odds of a move higher are at .

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for ET just turned positive on August 31, 2026. Looking at past instances where ET's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in of 54 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

Following a 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where ET advanced for three days, in of 361 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In of 310 cases where ET Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are .

Bearish Trend Analysis

The 10-day RSI Indicator for ET moved out of overbought territory on August 19, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 40 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In of the 40 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at .

The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In of 69 cases where ET's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where ET declined for three days, the price rose further in of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

ET broke above its upper Bollinger Band on August 10, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 41, placing this stock better than average.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.096) is normal, around the industry mean (186.128). P/E Ratio (14.733) is within average values for comparable stocks, (24.744). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.682) is also within normal values, averaging (4.018). Dividend Yield (0.062) settles around the average of (0.049) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.692) is also within normal values, averaging (4.597).

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. ET’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

Notable companies

The most notable companies in this group are Enterprise Products Partners LP (NYSE:EPD), Energy Transfer LP (NYSE:ET), Kinder Morgan (NYSE:KMI), Targa Resources Corp (NYSE:TRGP), Cheniere Energy (NYSE:LNG), Plains All American Pipeline LP (NASDAQ:PAA), Antero Midstream Corp (NYSE:AM), Plains GP Holdings LP (NASDAQ:PAGP), CMB.TECH NV (NYSE:CMBT), Scorpio Tankers (NYSE:STNG).

Industry description

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the Oil & Gas Pipelines Industry is 17.26B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 7.66K to 109.99B. ENB holds the highest valuation in this group at 109.99B. The lowest valued company is AVACF at 7.66K.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the Oil & Gas Pipelines Industry was 2%. For the same Industry, the average monthly price growth was 9%, and the average quarterly price growth was 12%. NGL experienced the highest price growth at 16%, while MARPS experienced the biggest fall at -6%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the Oil & Gas Pipelines Industry was 31%. For the same stocks of the Industry, the average monthly volume growth was 23% and the average quarterly volume growth was -29%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating: 24
P/E Growth Rating: 53
Price Growth Rating: 45
SMR Rating: 60
Profit Risk Rating: 40
Seasonality Score: 7 (-100 ... +100)
View a ticker or compare two or three
ET
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
Last 5 trading days
A.I. Advisor
published General Information

General Information

a provider of natural gas pipeline transportation and transmission services

Industry OilGasPipelines

Profile
Details
Industry
Oil And Gas Pipelines
Address
8111 Westchester Drive
Phone
+1 214 981-0700
Employees
13786
Web
https://www.energytransfer.com
Interact to see
Advertisement
Linde (LIN) reported Q4 2025 adjusted EPS of $4.20, topping estimates, with full-year revenue reaching $34 billion. 2026 EPS guidance of $17.40–$17.90 implies 6–9% growth, supported by a record $10 billion project backlog.
ConocoPhillips (COP) reported Q4 2025 adjusted EPS of $1.02, missing estimates due to weaker oil prices. Full-year adjusted earnings totaled $7.7 billion, with $19.9 billion in operating cash flow. Shares have gained more than 10% in recent weeks, supported by analyst upgrades and sector momentum.
Verisk Analytics (VRSK) delivered Q4 2025 revenue of $779 million, up 5.9% year over year, with adjusted EPS of $1.82, beating expectations. Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) reported Q3 FY2026 revenue of $2.62 billion, down 10.2% year over year, but adjusted diluted EPS climbed 14% to $1.77, well above estimates.
(OMC) Omnicom’s fourth-quarter report, released February 18, 2026, marked its first earnings update incorporating results from Interpublic Group (IPG), acquired on November 26, 2025. The combination created the world’s largest marketing services firm by revenue, a significant milestone as the advertising industry consolidates and adapts to digital transformation.
Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (EL) has rebounded with ~12% YTD gains and 50%+ one-year returns, supported by margin improvements and strong skincare/fragrance demand despite broader prestige beauty challenges.
GDDY (GoDaddy) is down more than 17% today because its 2026 revenue outlook and near‑term sales guidance came in below Wall Street expectations, reinforcing worries about slowing growth and intense AI‑driven competition even though Q4 2025 headline results were solid.
For the first half of fiscal 2026, organic net sales and adjusted EPS both declined about 3% year over year and missed analyst expectations, with U.S. spirits and Chinese white spirits particularly weak. Management cut full‑year 2026 guidance again, now expecting organic sales to fall 2–3% and organic operating profit to be flat to up only low single digits, versus a prior outlook of flat to slightly down sales and low‑ to mid‑single‑digit profit growth.
DRVN (Driven Brands) is down more than 36% today because the company disclosed serious errors in its past financial statements, is delaying its Q4 2025 earnings release, and will have to restate results for the last two fiscal years, which shattered investor confidence and raised concerns about leverage and profitability.
Q4 2025 revenue was strong at about 257–258 million (up roughly 16% year over year and above forecasts), but adjusted EPS was 0.30 versus about 0.31–0.32 expected, and EBITDA of about 101–102 million was a touch below consensus.
Q4 2025 revenue was about 392 million, roughly 10–20% below consensus (around 430–440 million), and EPS came in at −0.44−0.44 versus forecasts near −0.27−0.27 to −0.32−0.32, a more than 60% negative surprise. Results were hit by a roughly 170 million non‑cash impairment plus weaker realized pricing and volumes, driving a large net loss in the quarter despite strong full‑year EBITDA and free cash flow.
AXON surged approximately +17.56% on February 25, 2026, closing at $520.18 versus the prior session's close of $442.51. The primary catalyst was a blowout Q4 2025 earnings report, with adjusted EPS of $2.15 crushing the consensus estimate of approximately $1.67.
CAVA shares surged approximately +25.01% on February 25, 2026, closing near $84.76, up from the prior session's close of $67.80. The primary catalyst was a better-than-expected Q4 fiscal 2025 earnings report, with EPS of $0.04 beating the $0.03 consensus estimate and revenue of ~$274.99M exceeding the $268.04M estimate.
ODD shares plunged approximately 49.21% on February 25, 2026, closing near $14.74, compared to the prior close of approximately $29.02. The primary catalyst was a shock Q1 2026 revenue warning: management guided for a roughly 30% year-over-year revenue decline due to a severe spike in customer acquisition costs (CAC).
MNKD shares collapsed 36.82% on February 25, 2026, closing at $3.50 versus the prior session's close of $5.54 — one of the largest single-day declines in the stock's recent history. The primary catalyst was United Therapeutics' surprise unveiling of Tresmi, a proprietary soft mist inhaler delivering treprostinil, announced during the company's Q4 2025 earnings call.
EOSE shares fell sharply on February 26, 2026, dropping approximately 31% from the prior session's close of $11.13 to around $7.64 in early trading, following a pre-market earnings release. Primary catalyst: Eos Energy reported Q4 2025 non-GAAP EPS of -$0.72, missing analyst consensus estimates by $0.48, a 200%+ negative surprise.
ARRY beat Q4 revenue expectations but showed a sharp year‑over‑year sales decline and a sizeable net loss. Adjusted EBITDA for Q4 badly missed Wall Street estimates, highlighting ongoing margin and cost pressures. 2026 guidance for EPS and EBITDA came in well below analyst forecasts, signaling weaker‑than‑hoped earnings power over the next year.
C3.ai (AI) dropped more than 18% today after delivering a deeply disappointing quarterly report, slashing its revenue outlook, and announcing mass layoffs, which together reinforced doubts about its growth story in an increasingly competitive AI software market.
On the surface, PRCT’s top line still grew: Q4 2025 revenue reached about 76.4 million dollars, up roughly 11.9–12% from the prior year. However, analysts had expected something closer to 94–96 million dollars, so the shortfall of nearly 20% was significant for a high‑growth med‑tech name.
Payoneer Global (PAYO) fell more than 18% today after it missed Wall Street expectations on both Q4 2025 revenue and earnings, and issued softer‑than‑hoped guidance that reinforced concerns about slowing growth and competitive pressure in cross‑border fintech.
Gold, uranium, and rare earth stocks are moving fast in 2026 — and this 15-minute AI Trading Agent is built to move faster. Designed for high-beta Mining & Metals leaders like NEM, LEU, MP, and KGC, it transforms commodity volatility into structured, data-driven opportunity with institutional-grade risk control.