The $24 figure is not a single forecast pulled from one report. It is the arithmetic mean of approximately 15 individual 12-month price targets reviewed across firms, spanning roughly $22 on the low end (Goldman Sachs) to $26 on the high end (Capital One Financial). The calculated mean is about $24.40, which rounds to a clean $24 for presentation. Independent trackers report a comparable average near $24 to $25, confirming the figure is representative rather than an outlier.
Most targets sit between $23 and $25, reflecting a genuine but measured optimism. Stifel, JPMorgan, Truist, TD Cowen, Wells Fargo, and Morgan Stanley have all published $25 targets, while Citigroup, Barclays, Jefferies, UBS, and Scotiabank cluster at $24. Melius Research initiated coverage with a Hold and a $25 target in September 2026, noting the partnership has contracted more data-center and power-generation gas volume than any peer. The range is unusually tight for a midstream name, signaling that analysts broadly agree on the business trajectory while differing mainly on valuation.
Energy Transfer LP is a Dallas-based master limited partnership (MLP) that owns and operates pipelines, processing plants, storage, and terminals moving natural gas, natural gas liquids (NGLs), crude oil, and refined products across the United States. Its units traded near $20.47 in early October 2026, within a 52-week range of $16.18 to $21.84.
Reaching $24 requires a move of roughly 17% from the latest verified price. In percentage terms that is a substantial but not extreme advance, and it would take the units above their current 52-week high of $21.84. The path runs through continued execution on gas-transportation growth tied to electricity demand, disciplined capital spending, and distribution increases that keep income-oriented investors engaged.
The strongest fundamental argument is exposure to rising natural-gas volumes driven by data centers and AI-related power demand. Energy Transfer has secured roughly 900,000 Mcf/d of Oracle AI data-center laterals plus additional commitments tied to data-center and power projects, and about two-thirds of its roughly $5.75 billion growth capital budget is directed toward gas infrastructure.
The business is also heavily fee-based, with roughly 90% of earnings tied to contracted volumes rather than commodity prices, which supports stable distributable cash flow. The partnership reported second-quarter 2026 adjusted EPS of $0.59, well above consensus near $0.37, with adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) up about 31% year over year. A quarterly distribution of $0.34 per unit implies a yield near 6.6%, and the payout has been raised for 19 consecutive quarters, backed by distributable cash flow coverage of about 2.2 times. Several firms raised targets after the earnings beat, citing marketing-segment strength and higher full-year guidance.
The main obstacles are valuation, leverage, and legal risk. The units already trade near their 52-week high and at a forward P/E (price-to-earnings ratio) around 12, meaning much of the improvement is already reflected in the price. Analysts with Hold ratings, including Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, point to limited near-term catalysts for further multiple expansion.
Energy Transfer also carries meaningful debt, with leverage in the low-to-mid 3x range that it is working to reduce, and it faces ongoing litigation, including disputes over the Dakota Access Pipeline and an antitrust case with Williams. Although cash flows are largely fee-based, the partnership is not immune to weaker commodity prices, slower production growth, or a pullback in data-center spending. A distribution history that includes a cut in 2020 also underscores that income is not guaranteed.
The chart defines a clear battleground. The 52-week high of $21.84, set in September 2026, is the immediate resistance level the units must clear on the way to $24, with $22 serving as a psychological hurdle just above it. On the downside, the 50-day moving average near $20.87 and the 200-day moving average near $19.94 bracket current price, while the $20 round number and the prior $16.18 low mark deeper support. The units remain in a longer-term uptrend but are consolidating below the recent peak, making a decisive breakout above $21.84 a key structural signal to watch.
Analyst price targets typically reflect a research horizon of about 12 months, though the exact window varies by firm and should not be treated as a timing guarantee. The most important near-term event is third-quarter 2026 earnings, scheduled for November 3, 2026, where investors will focus on distributable cash flow, leverage reduction, the distribution decision, and any updates on data-center contracts and NGL export projects. Also worth watching are analyst target revisions, natural-gas price trends, and any resolution or escalation of the Dakota Access and Williams litigation.
For traders who want to track changing conditions in real time, Tickeron's AI Daily Buy/Sell Signals offer a systematic complement to fundamental research. The tool uses artificial intelligence to continuously monitor thousands of stocks and ETFs, generating Buy, Sell, or Hold signals based on evolving market conditions, technical behavior, and AI-driven analysis. Rather than replacing your own judgment, it helps surface opportunities, monitor open positions, and identify shifting trends more efficiently. Traders can use these signals to scan for fresh setups and stay ahead of changes in momentum across the market.
The $24 target is a realistic, analyst-derived average that sits meaningfully above the current price, implying a move of about 17% that would take Energy Transfer to fresh multi-year highs. Support comes from growing gas volumes tied to data centers, a fee-based model, a near-6.6% distribution yield, and a string of target increases following a strong second quarter. The counterweights are a valuation that already reflects much of the good news, elevated leverage, and unresolved litigation. With targets tightly clustered between $22 and $26, the debate is less about direction than about magnitude and pace. Whether the units reach $24 depends on continued execution on gas growth, leverage reduction, and whether the market is willing to pay a higher multiple — outcomes that no forecast, including the analyst average, can guarantee.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ET has been loosely correlated with OKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ET jumps, then OKE could also see price increases.