Go to the list of all blogs
Sergey Savastiouk's Avatar
published in Blogs
Apr 11, 2026

First Horizon (FHN) vs. Associated Banc-Corp (ASB): What Their Q1 Earnings Could Reveal for Regional Banks

Key Takeaways

  • First Horizon (FHN) reports Q1 2026 earnings on April 15, with consensus EPS of $0.49 and revenue of $869 million.
  • Associated Banc-Corp (ASB) follows on April 23, analysts expecting EPS around $0.69 amid 5-6% loan growth guidance.
  • Both regional banks showed strong Q4 2025 results: FHN EPS $0.52 (beat), NII $676 million; ASB EPS $0.80, record NII $310 million.
  • FHN boasts larger scale with $84 billion assets vs. ASB's $45 billion, but ASB delivered higher ROTCE (return on tangible common equity, a profitability measure) over 15%.
  • NIM (net interest margin, the spread between interest income and funding costs) stable at 3.5% for FHN and 3.06% for ASB in Q4.
  • Guidance points to continued growth: ASB eyes 5.5-6.5% full-year NII rise; both benefit from deposit stability and C&I (commercial and industrial) loan momentum.

Why These Earnings Reports Matter for Regional Banks

Quarterly earnings continue to serve as a vital benchmark for regional banks such as Associated Banc-Corp (ASB) and First Horizon (FHN), especially as they navigate shifting interest rates and broader economic pressures. Both banks focus on the Midwest and Southeast markets, with activities spanning commercial banking, consumer lending, and wealth management. In my view, FHN's larger footprint—$84 billion in assets—provides meaningful diversification, while ASB's $45 billion asset base leverages deep Wisconsin roots and robust deposit growth. Comparing their upcoming Q1 2026 results will shed light on their progress in net interest income growth, credit quality, and operational efficiency—factors that matter a great deal for investors assessing stability and yield in the regional banking space.

A Closer Look at First Horizon

First Horizon (FHN) is set to release its Q1 2026 results on April 15 before the market opens, followed by a conference call at 9:30 a.m. ET. Analysts anticipate EPS of $0.49, up from $0.43 year-over-year, alongside revenue around $869 million and net interest income near $658 million. The bank's Q4 2025 performance laid a strong foundation: EPS came in at $0.52, beating estimates by $0.06, with revenue of $892 million and NII at $676 million, up slightly quarter-over-quarter. NIM held steady at 3.51%, and ROTCE reached 15%. Loans grew to $64 billion, up 2% quarter-over-quarter, while deposits stood at $67.5 billion. Key areas to watch include deposit costs, which fell to 2.53% in Q4, along with mortgage warehouse lending and credit metrics, where net charge-offs remained low. For full-year 2025, net income available to common shareholders rose 29% to $956 million.

Associated Banc-Corp's Position

Associated Banc-Corp (ASB) will report Q1 2026 earnings on April 23 after the market close, with a conference call at 4 p.m. CT. Consensus estimates point to EPS of $0.69, supported by 2026 guidance excluding acquisitions: 5-6% loan and deposit growth, NII growth of 5.5-6.5%, and noninterest income up 4-5%. Q4 2025 was a standout, delivering record EPS of $0.80, NII of $310 million (up 15% annually), NIM of 3.06%, and ROTCE over 15%. Loans expanded to $31.2 billion, up 5% year-over-year, core deposits reached $29.6 billion (up 3% YoY), and total assets hit $45.2 billion. Commercial and industrial loans led the way with 11% YoY growth, provisions dropped to $7 million, and net charge-offs were just 3 basis points. Full-year earnings set a record at $463 million.

Comparing Their Earnings and Market Profiles

FHN holds an advantage in scale, with a market cap around $11.5 billion compared to ASB's $5 billion; assets of $84 billion versus $45 billion; loans of $64 billion against $31 billion; and deposits of $67 billion versus $36 billion. This size supports diversified revenue streams but also introduces wider risks, such as mortgage exposure. ASB stands out with stronger profitability—2025 EPS of $2.77 versus FHN's $1.89, plus elevated ROTCE—and more agile growth driven by its C&I focus. Both have stabilized NIM in the face of rate cuts—3.51% for FHN and 3.06% for ASB—with deposit betas easing. Credit quality remains solid across the board: low net charge-offs at around 16 basis points for FHN (excluding purchased credit deteriorated) and 12 basis points annually for ASB. Market sentiment often favors FHN's scale for potential M&A interest, yet ASB's efficiency, with guided expense growth of 3%, suggests meaningful upside. Risks like an economic slowdown could pressure loans, but CET1 ratios of 10.6% for FHN and 10% for ASB offer solid buffers. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how these stocks stack up against peers in the sector.

Discovering Opportunities with Tickeron’s AI Screener

In my own research process, I rely on Tickeron’s AI Screener, an AI-powered tool for uncovering stocks and ETFs through filters on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and predictive signals. It scans thousands of instruments using criteria like industry, market cap, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics, surfacing trade ideas, trending names, breakouts, and hidden opportunities far more efficiently than manual methods. This has helped me spot edges in banking names like ASB and FHN—worth exploring if you're digging into regional banks.

My Take from Tickeron AI

From what I see in Tickeron AI's analysis, it gives ASB a slight edge (~60% probability) due to its superior earnings quality with higher EPS and ROTCE, consistent NII records, and strong growth positioning—though FHN's scale provides a buffer in volatile times. I'm watching this closely as their reports unfold.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Related Ticker: ASB, FHN

Contributor

Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.


ASB's Stochastic Oscillator sits in oversold zone for 3 days

The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an uptrend is expected.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

Following a 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where ASB advanced for three days, in of 298 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In of 231 cases where ASB Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are .

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on August 18, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on ASB as a result. In of 92 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for ASB turned negative on August 19, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 47 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In of the 47 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at .

ASB moved below its 50-day moving average on August 25, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where ASB declined for three days, the price rose further in of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.069) is normal, around the industry mean (1.352). P/E Ratio (10.776) is within average values for comparable stocks, (24.338). ASB's Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is very low in comparison to the industry average of (1.825). Dividend Yield (0.031) settles around the average of (0.031) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.318) is also within normal values, averaging (3.769).

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 56, placing this stock better than average.

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. ASB’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

Notable companies

The most notable companies in this group are PNC Financial Services Group (NYSE:PNC), US Bancorp (NYSE:USB), Itau Unibanco Banco Holding SA (NYSE:ITUB), Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft (NYSE:DB), Huntington Bancshares (NASDAQ:HBAN), Banco Bradesco SA (NYSE:BBD), Regions Financial Corp (NYSE:RF), KeyCorp (NYSE:KEY).

Industry description

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the Regional Banks Industry is 6.37B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 10.73K to 142.82B. CIHHF holds the highest valuation in this group at 142.82B. The lowest valued company is ACBCQ at 10.73K.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the Regional Banks Industry was 0%. For the same Industry, the average monthly price growth was -0%, and the average quarterly price growth was 14%. SUPV experienced the highest price growth at 14%, while OPHC experienced the biggest fall at -11%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the Regional Banks Industry was 12%. For the same stocks of the Industry, the average monthly volume growth was 1% and the average quarterly volume growth was 24%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating: 48
P/E Growth Rating: 54
Price Growth Rating: 48
SMR Rating: 52
Profit Risk Rating: 55
Seasonality Score: -28 (-100 ... +100)
View a ticker or compare two or three
ASB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
Last 5 trading days
A.I. Advisor
published General Information

General Information

a regional bank

Industry RegionalBanks

Profile
Details
Industry
Regional Banks
Address
433 Main Street
Phone
+1 920 491-7500
Employees
4100
Web
https://www.associatedbank.com
Interact to see
Advertisement
ERII shares have remained resilient, trading near $15.47 ahead of Q4 and full-year 2025 earnings scheduled for February 25, 2026. Q3 2025 results exceeded expectations, with revenue of $32 million and EPS of $0.07, despite year-over-year declines tied to project timing.
Liberty Broadband Corporation (LBRDA) has experienced pronounced swings in recent weeks, touching multiyear lows before staging a sharp recovery. The stock continues to trade within a wide 52-week range, closely tied to the value of its Charter Communications stake and investor expectations around the proposed merger.
Arm Holdings (ARM) shares have demonstrated resilience in recent sessions, rebounding after an initial earnings-related pullback and stabilizing near technical support levels. While smartphone-related headwinds tied to memory shortages pressured sentiment, momentum in AI-driven data center royalties helped restore confidence.
Shell plc (SHEL) reported Q4 2025 adjusted earnings of $3.3 billion, below expectations due to weaker oil prices and non-cash tax charges. Full-year adjusted earnings reached $18.5 billion, supported by strong LNG and upstream operations. A 4% dividend increase to $0.372 per share and a new $3.5 billion buyback program reinforce capital return commitments.
Linde (LIN) reported Q4 2025 adjusted EPS of $4.20, topping estimates, with full-year revenue reaching $34 billion. 2026 EPS guidance of $17.40–$17.90 implies 6–9% growth, supported by a record $10 billion project backlog.
ConocoPhillips (COP) reported Q4 2025 adjusted EPS of $1.02, missing estimates due to weaker oil prices. Full-year adjusted earnings totaled $7.7 billion, with $19.9 billion in operating cash flow. Shares have gained more than 10% in recent weeks, supported by analyst upgrades and sector momentum.
Verisk Analytics (VRSK) delivered Q4 2025 revenue of $779 million, up 5.9% year over year, with adjusted EPS of $1.82, beating expectations. Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) reported Q3 FY2026 revenue of $2.62 billion, down 10.2% year over year, but adjusted diluted EPS climbed 14% to $1.77, well above estimates.
(OMC) Omnicom’s fourth-quarter report, released February 18, 2026, marked its first earnings update incorporating results from Interpublic Group (IPG), acquired on November 26, 2025. The combination created the world’s largest marketing services firm by revenue, a significant milestone as the advertising industry consolidates and adapts to digital transformation.
Copart (CPRT) is set to report fiscal Q2 2026 earnings on February 19, 2026, after market close. Consensus calls for EPS of $0.39–$0.40 and revenue of $1.15–$1.18 billion. Global Payments (GPN) posted Q4 2025 adjusted EPS of $3.18, in line with expectations, and adjusted net revenue of $2.32 billion, up 6% in constant currency (excluding dispositions). Thomson Reuters (TRI) delivered Q4 2025 adjusted EPS of $1.07 and revenue of $2.01 billion, up 5% year over year, supported by recurring subscription growth.
Unilever PLC (UL) leads year-to-date performance with a 12.61% gain, ahead of Diageo plc (DEO) at 9.90% and Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. (KDP) at 4.27%. DEO offers the highest dividend yield at 4.35%, compared with KDP (3.16%) and UL (2.97%). All three stocks carry low betas—DEO (0.18), UL (0.24), and KDP (0.35)—highlighting their defensive characteristics.
Q1 Fiscal 2026 Results: Revenue of $333M and adjusted EBITDA of $50M (15% margin), exceeding analyst expectations. FY2026 Guidance Raised: Adjusted EBITDA now projected at $225M, with revenue reaffirmed near $1.5B. EV Backlog Growth: 855 electric buses worth $277M, highlighting robust demand supported by EPA clean bus funding.
IBM fell over 10% today mainly because a new AI tool from Anthropic is seen as a direct threat to IBM’s lucrative COBOL modernization and consulting business, triggering worries that key legacy‑modernization revenue will be automated away.
Today’s drop is mainly about competitive positioning and future growth expectations, not an immediate collapse of current Wegovy/Ozempic sales, but it signals that Novo may not have the strongest next‑wave obesity drug versus Eli Lilly, which is why the stock sold off so sharply.
RNG (RingCentral) dropped over 12% today mainly as a sharp pullback after a very steep recent run‑up driven by upbeat Q4 results, guidance, and capital‑return news, with profit‑taking amplified by valuation concerns and a weak broader tech tap
Fundamentally, the latest public guidance is still for rapid growth and profitability, but today’s drop reflects a reset of sentiment and valuation rather than a brand‑new deterioration in those targets. For investors, the key question is whether the current price appropriately reflects execution risk, competition in diagnostics, and macro volatility after the guidance‑driven rally and subsequent reversal.
TNC (Tennant Company) is down more than 25% today because it reported a very large earnings and revenue miss for Q4 2025, blamed on serious ERP rollout problems and weaker demand, and guided to a slower‑than‑hoped recovery in 2026.
XMTR (Xometry) is down more than 21% today because, despite reporting record growth and an earnings beat, the company announced a CEO transition and investors used the news to take profits after a big prior run‑up, with heavy short interest amplifying the drop.
EDSA (Edesa Biotech) is up more than 21% today largely on speculative trading in a very illiquid penny stock with no clear, company‑specific news catalyst, likely driven by technical factors, retail flows, and short‑term trading rather than fundamentals.
Q4 2025 revenue came in strong at about 214–215 million, up mid‑30s percent year over year and a few percent above estimates, but GAAP EPS was only 0.08 versus expectations around 0.31, a roughly 70–75% miss and down from 0.13 a year earlier.
Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (EL) has rebounded with ~12% YTD gains and 50%+ one-year returns, supported by margin improvements and strong skincare/fragrance demand despite broader prestige beauty challenges.