GET DAILY SIGNALSHamilton Lane (HLNE) Delivers EPS Beat in Q2 Fiscal 2027 Despite Revenue Shortfall
Key Takeaways
- Hamilton Lane reported non-GAAP earnings per share (EPS) of $1.98 for the second quarter of fiscal 2027, beating analyst consensus estimates of roughly $1.65 to $1.72.
- Total revenue came in at $204.43 million, up 7.1% year over year, but fell short of the consensus estimate of about $216 million.
- Total fee-earning assets under management (AUM) reached $86 billion, up 12% from a year ago, driven by strong growth in specialized funds and the Evergreen platform.
- Incentive fees declined 9.3% year over year to $40.4 million, while management and advisory fees grew 15.4% to $164.03 million.
- The company declared a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share, supporting a target full-year dividend of $2.40, an 11% increase from the prior fiscal year.
- For more on this ticker, explore its Major News, Today's Price Move, Price Targets, and Forecast on additional pages.
- Discover automated trading ideas by exploring Trending AI Robots.
Why These Results Matter for Investors
Hamilton Lane stands as one of the largest players in private markets, so its quarterly updates provide useful insight into areas like private equity, credit, and infrastructure. The second quarter of fiscal 2027, ending September 30, 2026, highlights how ongoing fundraising, shifts in fee structures, and inflows into the Evergreen platform are showing up in the numbers. Fee-earning AUM continues to expand and management fees are rising, yet investors are paying close attention to whether overall revenue and earnings growth can match the firm's broader growth even when performance-based incentive fees prove more variable.
Quarterly Numbers in Detail
Non-GAAP EPS came in at $1.98 for the quarter, ahead of the $1.65 to $1.72 consensus range. Revenue reached $204.43 million, reflecting a 7.1% year-over-year increase yet falling short of the roughly $216 million expected. Core management and advisory fees advanced 15.4% to $164.03 million, while incentive fees dropped 9.3% to $40.4 million. Fee-earning AUM climbed to $86 billion, up 12% from the prior year. Specialized funds fee-earning AUM expanded about 25% over the trailing twelve months to exceed $44 billion, and the Evergreen platform topped $21 billion with roughly 42% year-over-year growth. The firm also announced a $0.60 quarterly dividend, consistent with a full-year target of $2.40 that represents an 11% increase from last fiscal year. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.
How the Market Is Responding
The report offered a mixed signal. The EPS beat pointed to solid profitability and cost control, but the revenue shortfall, partly tied to softer incentive fees, reminded investors of the variability in performance-linked income. Attention stayed on the strength of recurring fee-earning AUM growth and the move toward higher-fee specialized funds that improved the blended fee rate. Shares had already faced pressure in recent months, and this print kept the focus on whether steady management fees can maintain momentum when incentive fees fluctuate.
Key Areas to Watch Ahead
Looking forward, the emphasis will likely remain on sustaining fundraising momentum in specialized funds and the Evergreen platform. A solid pipeline of new strategies in secondaries, venture, credit, and impact areas could lead to additional closes that generate retroactive catch-up fees on committed capital. Incentive fee trends will also matter, as they depend on realized investment performance and can vary significantly quarter to quarter. Strong exits would help support this line, while slower realizations might weigh on revenue relative to expectations. Evergreen net inflows, which picked up during the quarter, along with expanded distribution through new sales professionals, represent other items worth monitoring. Longer-term technology efforts around tokenization and data automation could further broaden access to private markets over time.
Exploring AI Tools in My Research Process
From what I see, tools like Tickeron’s AI Screener help surface relevant comparisons and filter ideas around earnings events without replacing core fundamental work. In my view, running a quick scan on peer metrics after reviewing results like these adds a useful layer when assessing relative positioning.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Contributor
Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.
HLNE's RSI Indicator ascending out of oversold territory
The RSI Indicator for HLNE moved out of oversold territory on October 15, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 31 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 24 of the 31 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 77%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 28, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on HLNE as a result. In 43 of 73 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 59%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for HLNE just turned positive on October 20, 2026. Looking at past instances where HLNE's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 33 of 44 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 75%.
Following a +5.34% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where HLNE advanced for three days, in 210 of 309 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 68%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator entered the overbought zone. Expect a price pull-back in the foreseeable future.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where HLNE declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 74%.
HLNE broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 02, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for HLNE entered a downward trend on October 21, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 31 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 69 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. HLNE’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 82 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (5.161) is normal, around the industry mean (2.420). P/E Ratio (13.249) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-3.848). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.310) is also within normal values, averaging (1.319). Dividend Yield (0.027) settles around the average of (0.268) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (5.688) is also within normal values, averaging (15.694).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 85 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 95 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. HLNE’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 80, placing this stock worse than average.
Notable companies
Industry description
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Advertisement
General Information
a provider of investment advisory services
Industry InvestmentManagers
Advertisement