GET DAILY SIGNALSIONQ vs QBTS: Weighing Two Quantum Computing Stocks
Key Takeaways
- IONQ has scaled far faster on revenue, posting roughly $246 million in trailing 12-month revenue, while QBTS generated only about $12 million over the same period.
- Both stocks remain deeply unprofitable and richly valued relative to sales, leaving little room for execution missteps.
- IonQ has expanded through acquisitions (SkyWater Technology and Elisity), while D-Wave Quantum remains a more focused pure-play on quantum annealing and cloud services.
- Sentiment has cooled across the sector in recent months, with both names trading well below their recent highs after sharp year-to-date declines.
- D-Wave carries a growing backlog and stronger bookings momentum, but IonQ has more visible, diversified revenue and a larger cash base.
Why These Two Quantum Names Stand Out
IonQ and D-Wave Quantum are two of the most closely watched pure-play quantum computing stocks, and they are frequently compared because they represent different technological approaches within the same emerging industry. IonQ specializes in trapped-ion quantum computers sold as a full-stack platform, while D-Wave is best known for quantum annealing systems optimized for optimization problems. For growth-oriented investors and traders tracking the volatile quantum sector, understanding how these two companies differ in business model, momentum, and risk is essential. This stock comparison examines their recent performance, market positioning, and the factors currently shaping sentiment toward each name. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stocks compare to others in the industry.
IONQ Overview and Recent Performance
IonQ, Inc. develops trapped-ion quantum computing systems and sells access to them through its own cloud service and third-party platforms such as Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud. In recent months, the company has shifted toward becoming a broader "full-stack quantum platform and foundry," driven by its acquisitions of chip foundry SkyWater Technology and cybersecurity firm Elisity.
Recent market activity has been volatile. IONQ shares have declined sharply from their prior highs, with the stock down roughly 30% year to date at recent levels and about half over the trailing year. The company's revenue, however, has expanded rapidly, with trailing 12-month revenue near $246 million, up more than 370% year over year, helped in part by acquisitions. Management raised its 2026 revenue guidance to a range of $450 million to $460 million, reflecting SkyWater's contribution. A recent $2 billion equity offering and the Elisity acquisition introduced concerns about shareholder dilution, which weighed on sentiment even as analyst consensus remains generally positive.
QBTS Overview and Recent Performance
D-Wave Quantum Inc. develops quantum annealing computers and, increasingly, gate-model quantum systems, delivered through both direct system sales and its quantum cloud (known as "QCaaS," or quantum computing as a service). The company has focused on commercial optimization applications across logistics, manufacturing, and telecommunications.
Recent performance for QBTS has been weaker than its peer. The stock has fallen roughly 55% year to date and around 70% over the trailing 12 months, trading near its 52-week low. Revenue remains small and lumpy, with second-quarter 2026 revenue of about $3.1 million essentially flat year over year, as hardware sales are recognized only upon delivery. Adjusted EBITDA losses widened materially. On the positive side, D-Wave's backlog rose to roughly $40.7 million, first-half bookings surged, and the company delivered Italy's first annealing quantum system while expanding its partnership with SkyWater. A securities lawsuit and a CFO transition added to near-term uncertainty. From what I see, checking the AI Trend Prediction Engine helped clarify the recent price action here.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The clearest contrast between these two stocks is scale and diversification versus focus and momentum. IonQ has built a materially larger and faster-growing revenue base, and its acquisitions have extended it beyond quantum computing into semiconductor foundry services and cybersecurity. D-Wave, by comparison, remains a smaller, more concentrated business whose revenue is heavily dependent on a handful of large system deliveries, making its top line inherently lumpy.
On growth drivers, IonQ's expanded guidance and new product roadmap (including its Superion 256 system) provide a broader set of catalysts. D-Wave's growth case rests on converting its sharply higher bookings and backlog into recognized revenue, particularly through two expected fourth-quarter system shipments. Both companies face the same sector-wide risk: valuations that remain high relative to sales despite significant share-price declines, and ongoing operating losses that require sustained capital.
In terms of market sentiment, IonQ has retained stronger analyst support and a larger cash cushion, while D-Wave trades at a higher price-to-sales multiple relative to its shrinking revenue. Risk profiles differ too: IonQ's recent equity raise introduces dilution risk, whereas D-Wave faces execution and revenue-recognition risk as well as litigation overhang.
Using AI Tools for Deeper Analysis
I often turn to Tickeron’s AI tools when comparing names like these. The platform’s ability to scan patterns and trends across thousands of tickers helps put the relative setups into context without relying solely on traditional metrics. In this case, it reinforced the differences in revenue visibility and backlog momentum I noted above. One thing that stands out is how these signals can flag potential inflection points in a sector this volatile.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
IONQ in downward trend: 10-day moving average broke below 50-day moving average on October 13, 2026
The 10-day moving average for IONQ crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 13, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 16 of 16 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 07, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on IONQ as a result. In 70 of 81 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 86%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for IONQ turned negative on October 08, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 41 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 34 of the 41 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 83%.
IONQ moved below its 50-day moving average on October 08, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where IONQ declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 86%.
The Aroon Indicator for IONQ entered a downward trend on September 23, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where IONQ's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 21 of 21 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 10 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +4.87% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where IONQ advanced for three days, in 233 of 273 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 85%.
IONQ may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 48 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (3.931) is normal, around the industry mean (-6.987). P/E Ratio (-8.341) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-3.059). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (23.994). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.011) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (51.020) is also within normal values, averaging (51.774).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 73 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. IONQ’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 88, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 80 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. IONQ’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 97 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 98 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
Notable companies
Industry description
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Advertisement
General Information
Industry ComputerProcessingHardware
Advertisement