Go to the list of all blogs
Allana's Avatar
published in Blogs
Sep 03, 2026
Primoris Services (PRIM) Declines -18% Over 30 Days After Q2 Miss and Guidance Reductions

Primoris Services (PRIM) Declines -18% Over 30 Days After Q2 Miss and Guidance Reductions

Key Takeaways

  • Primoris Services (PRIM) shares declined roughly 18% over the last 30 days, falling from about $90.85 to approximately $74.32.
  • The pullback was driven primarily by weak second-quarter 2026 results, including a net loss, compressed margins, and an Energy segment that swung to a gross loss.
  • Over the last quarter, the stock is down roughly 41%, reflecting successive guidance reductions tied to cost overruns on six renewable-energy projects.
  • An ongoing securities class action, with a lead-plaintiff deadline of September 21, 2026, adds a legal overhang to the shares.
  • Record backlog, strong Utilities demand, and new gas-fired generation awards provide partial offsets to the negative sentiment.

Company Background and Competitive Landscape

Primoris Services Corporation operates as a specialty construction and infrastructure services firm focused on utility, energy, and renewables markets in the United States and Canada. Its two main segments are Utilities, centered on natural gas and electric distribution, transmission, and communications infrastructure, and Energy, which handles engineering, procurement, and construction for energy, renewables, storage, renewable fuels, and petrochemical projects.

The company competes with peers including Quanta Services (PWR), MasTec (MTZ), and EMCOR Group (EME). Its advantages include a sizable diversified backlog, established master service agreements, and exposure to long-term themes like power delivery, data-center infrastructure, and natural-gas-fired generation. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.

Recent Stock Price Movement: 30 Days and the Quarter

Over the past 30 days, Primoris Services (PRIM) shares fell approximately 18%, moving from a closing level of about $90.85 down to roughly $74.32. The drop gathered pace in early August after the second-quarter 2026 results came out, with the shares continuing to ease through late August before finding some stability in the $72-to-$74 area.

The quarterly picture shows a steeper move. From around $126 in early June, the stock has dropped about 41%, as earnings expectations were repriced lower following repeated guidance adjustments. The trend has been consistently negative, with sharp single-day drops tied to those resets.

Key Drivers Behind the 30-Day Decline

The main catalyst over the last 30 days was the second-quarter 2026 earnings release in early August. Revenue fell 10.7% year over year to $1.69 billion, and the company reported a net loss of $24.2 million versus net income of $84.3 million in the same period a year earlier. Adjusted EBITDA declined to $11.4 million from $154.6 million, while consolidated gross margin narrowed to 4.9% from 12.3%.

The Energy segment saw the largest deterioration, posting a gross loss due to cost overruns and reduced volumes on six renewable-energy projects. Management lowered full-year free cash flow guidance to a range of $150 million to $200 million from the prior $350 million to $400 million range, citing an estimated $200 million cash-flow impact from those projects. An ongoing securities class action, Boston Retirement System v. Primoris Services Corporation, with a lead-plaintiff deadline of September 21, 2026, added further pressure. Positive offsets such as a record total backlog of approximately $13.86 billion, roughly $3.9 billion in new awards, and solid Utilities demand helped limit the extent of the decline but did not reverse it.

Factors Behind the Quarterly Performance

The broader quarterly decline stems from ongoing execution challenges in the renewables business. On June 22, 2026, Primoris provided a business update that disclosed additional cost overruns on the six renewable projects and significantly reduced full-year guidance. The 2026 adjusted EPS outlook was lowered to a range of $2.05 to $2.60 from $5.80 to $6.00, and adjusted EBITDA guidance was cut to $275 million to $325 million from $560 million to $580 million. The departure of Chief Operating Officer Jeremy Kinch, effective immediately, was also announced, and the stock fell more than 20% in the next session.

This followed an earlier decline in May after first-quarter results showed a 5.4% revenue drop and a notable miss on adjusted EPS, with management pointing to higher costs on renewable projects from redesigns, sequencing changes, labor issues, and weather. The departure of the renewables president in early June and the May closing of the Paynecrest acquisition also influenced sentiment during the period.

Looking Ahead: Key Items to Monitor

Going forward, attention will likely center on how the remaining troubled projects are completed. Management has noted that two of the six problem projects are finished, three should reach substantial completion in the third quarter, and the last one by year-end. Any further cost increases would be closely watched.

The next earnings report and updates on free cash flow and margin recovery will be important. Consensus estimates anticipate a rebound in fiscal 2027 earnings, though that depends on margin normalization across segments. Progress on the securities litigation ahead of the September 21, 2026 lead-plaintiff deadline remains a notable risk. Broader factors such as utility capital spending, data-center demand, natural-gas generation awards, and interest-rate conditions will also play a role in the stock’s path.

Using AI Tools for Market Analysis

When evaluating names like this one amid volatility, I find it helpful to review systematic trading approaches. Tickeron’s AI Trading Bots provide a range of strategies across different timeframes and objectives, allowing investors to examine historical performance metrics and align approaches with their own goals. From what I see, these tools can offer additional context when assessing execution risks and sector trends.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Related Ticker: PRIM

Contributor

Allana's AvatarAllana|Expert

Financial analyst and market blogger with expertise in equity research, fundamental analysis, and macroeconomic trends. I regularly publish coverage on individual stocks, ETFs, and sector developments — combining rigorous financial analysis with clear, engaging writing for a broad investment audience.


PRIM's RSI Oscillator climbs out of oversold territory

The RSI Oscillator for PRIM moved out of oversold territory on July 30, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 24 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In of the 24 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at .

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 13 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.

Following a 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where PRIM advanced for three days, in of 331 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

PRIM may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on August 13, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on PRIM as a result. In of 83 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for PRIM turned negative on August 28, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 46 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In of the 46 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at .

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where PRIM declined for three days, the price rose further in of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

The Aroon Indicator for PRIM entered a downward trend on August 07, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.421) is normal, around the industry mean (16.751). P/E Ratio (28.333) is within average values for comparable stocks, (215.553). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (2.858). Dividend Yield (0.004) settles around the average of (0.013) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.540) is also within normal values, averaging (2.925).

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. PRIM’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 75, placing this stock worse than average.

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. PRIM’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

Notable companies

The most notable companies in this group are MasTec (NYSE:MTZ).

Industry description

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the Engineering & Construction Industry is 7.5B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 15.66K to 14.67T. WKAPF holds the highest valuation in this group at 14.67T. The lowest valued company is CIPI at 15.66K.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the Engineering & Construction Industry was -6%. For the same Industry, the average monthly price growth was -14%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9%. MGN experienced the highest price growth at 17%, while FGL experienced the biggest fall at -99%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the Engineering & Construction Industry was -16%. For the same stocks of the Industry, the average monthly volume growth was 8% and the average quarterly volume growth was 84%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating: 64
P/E Growth Rating: 54
Price Growth Rating: 60
SMR Rating: 71
Profit Risk Rating: 74
Seasonality Score: 2 (-100 ... +100)
View a ticker or compare two or three
PRIM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
Last 5 trading days
A.I. Advisor
published General Information

General Information

a provider of engineering, construction and specialty contracting services

Industry EngineeringConstruction

Profile
Details
Industry
Engineering And Construction
Address
2300 N. Field Street
Phone
+1 214 740-5600
Employees
14058
Web
https://www.prim.com
Interact to see
Advertisement
Q4 2025 gross profit grew about 24% year over year to roughly 2.87 billion dollars, with Cash App gross profit up about 33% and Square gross profit up around 7%. Adjusted operating income jumped to about 588 million dollars in Q4 (around a 20% margin), up strongly from the prior year. For the full year, gross profit was roughly 10.36 billion dollars, up about 17% year over year, showing broad‑based growth across the business.
NVDA shares declined 5.47% on Thursday, February 26, 2026, closing at $184.87, down from the prior session close of approximately $195.56. The primary catalyst was a "sell the news" reaction to Q4 fiscal 2026 earnings that beat estimates on every headline metric but failed to ignite meaningful buying interest.
Shares of UHS fell approximately 9.15% on February 26, 2026, closing near $209.62, down from a prior close of $230.73. The primary catalyst was a mixed Q4 2025 earnings report: adjusted EPS of $5.88 missed the consensus estimate of $5.92, and revenue of $4.49 billion fell short of the $4.50–$4.51 billion analyst forecast.
HEI shares fell approximately 9.21% on February 26, 2026, closing at $312.98 versus a prior close near $344.72. The primary catalyst was HEICO's Q1 fiscal 2026 earnings report, which delivered headline beats on EPS and revenue but disappointed investors on margin quality, Adjusted EBITDA, and cash flow generation.
IONQ surged +21.70% on February 26, 2026, closing at $40.88 versus the prior session's close of $33.59. The primary catalyst was a powerful Q4 and full-year 2025 earnings beat, with annual revenue of $130 million coming in 20% above guidance and representing 202% year-over-year growth.
Shares of CRWV declined approximately 11.38% in Friday's session, falling from a prior close of $97.63 to around $86.52, after the company reported Q4 2025 earnings after the bell on Thursday, February 26. The primary catalyst was a wider-than-expected net loss of $0.56 per share on EPS expectations of −$0.49, alongside a massive capex plan calling for $30–$35 billion in infrastructure spending in 2026, more than doubling the prior year.
DELL shares surged 16.64% during Friday's session, last trading around $141.65, up from the prior close of $121.45. The primary catalyst was a blowout Q4 fiscal year 2026 earnings report, with revenue of $33.4 billion — up 39% year-over-year — beating consensus estimates by roughly $2 billion.
Stifel Financial (SF) appears to be down over 30% on your screen today primarily because its shares began trading split‑adjusted following a three‑for‑two stock split (a 50% stock dividend), not because of a sudden collapse in the company’s fundamentals. After the split, the per‑share price is mechanically lower, even though the underlying value of the business has not changed.
Sunrun (RUN) sank more than 35–37% today even after posting a massive Q4 beat because its outlook and strategic commentary signaled slower volume growth, tighter financing conditions, and a more defensive stance on 2026, which together triggered a sharp reset in already‑volatile solar sentiment.
PAR Technology Corp. (PAR) dropped more than 28% today after its latest earnings report, even though it beat on revenue and EPS, because investors focused on weak profitability, continued operating losses, and a wave of sharply lower analyst price targets that signaled reduced confidence in the stock’s near‑term upside.
Carter’s (CRI) dropped more than 21% today because, even though it beat Q4 expectations on both sales and earnings, management issued a much weaker 2026 earnings outlook, highlighted ongoing margin pressure from tariffs and product costs, and guided to a sharp near‑term EPS drop that jarred investors.
WES is an oil & gas midstream partnership (NYSE: WES) with largely fee‑based, long‑term volume contracts in key basins such as the Delaware and DJ, which insulate cash flows from direct oil price swings but still tie them to producer activity and throughput. Current positioning: The units trade around 41–42 dollars with a high cash yield (roughly 9% dividend), solid profitability (P/E about 14), and strong returns on equity above 40%, signaling a mature, cash‑generative infrastructure asset.
SD is a pure‑play upstream energy company with operations concentrated in U.S. onshore oil and gas, so its revenues are directly influenced by global oil and gas price movements.
TTI is an oilfield services and specialty chemicals company, not a direct oil producer, so it tends to benefit when higher oil prices lead to sustained drilling and completion activity rather than from price moves alone. The Iran war raises the odds of major supply disruptions, and several commentators see a path to Brent near 100 dollars per barrel if the Strait of Hormuz is impaired, which would support energy capex and, by extension, demand for TTI’s services and fluids.
COP is a global upstream heavyweight, producing more than 2.3 million barrels of oil equivalent per day and generating over 60 billion dollars in annual revenue, with a strategy centered on disciplined capex and robust cash returns to shareholders. The Iran war introduces a structural risk premium into oil markets; if supply from the region or traffic through Hormuz is disrupted, analysts see Brent potentially trading nearer 90–100 dollars per barrel or higher, which is supportive for ConocoPhillips’ cash flows and valuation.
ONEOK is a diversified midstream operator focused on gathering, processing, fractionation, transportation, storage, and marine export of natural gas, NGLs, refined products, and crude, with most revenue coming from relatively stable fee‑based contracts. The US–Iran war increases the odds of supply disruptions or perceived risks in the Gulf, which has already contributed to higher oil and LNG prices and a persistent geopolitical risk premium.
Exxon Mobil is a global energy giant with roughly 324 billion dollars in trailing revenue, around 29 billion dollars in earnings, record production near 4.7 million barrels per day, and a long runway of projects in Guyana, the Permian, LNG and carbon capture. The Iran war has disrupted shipping through the Strait of Hormuz and could keep a 10–20 dollar‑per‑barrel risk premium in crude if tensions stay high, which would generally be positive for XOM’s upstream earnings and refining margins.
Chevron is a global integrated oil and gas major with growing production, a strong balance sheet, and significant exposure to long‑life projects in the Permian, LNG, and Venezuela, aiming for structurally higher cash flows through 2026 and beyond. The Iran war has increased the probability of supply disruptions or perceived risk in the Gulf, and several analysts warn that Brent could move above 100 dollars per barrel if Hormuz traffic is impaired, which would generally be supportive for Chevron’s earnings and free cash flow.
Shell is a diversified global major with roughly 266.9 billion dollars in trailing revenue, 17.8 billion dollars in earnings, a 3.5% dividend yield, and an active buyback program, trading at about 13 times earnings near its 52‑week high. The Iran war materially raises the risk of disruptions or perceived threats around the Strait of Hormuz, which could push oil well above 80–100 dollars per barrel and tighten LNG markets, a setup that is generally supportive for Shell’s upstream and LNG businesses.
LMT is a defense heavyweight with roughly 75 billion dollars in annual revenue, about 5 billion dollars in earnings, and a backlog above 190 billion dollars spanning fighters, missiles, space, and sustainment contracts that support long‑term cash flow. The U.S.–Iran war has triggered a classic “flight to defense,” with sector ETFs and names like Lockheed rallying as investors price in higher defense spending, missile restocking, and elevated geopolitical risk for years to come.