Go to the list of all blogs
Jimmy Landsman's Avatar
published in Blogs
Apr 09, 2026
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL): Analyzing the Recent -21% Decline and Quarterly Trends

ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL): Analyzing the Recent -21% Decline and Quarterly Trends

Key Takeaways

  • BOIL declined -21% over the past 30 days amid softening natural gas futures prices, driven by milder weather forecasts reducing heating demand.
  • Over the past quarter, the ETF fell -9%, reflecting a partial recovery from January's extreme cold snap followed by post-winter normalization and elevated inventories.
  • Henry Hub natural gas prices dropped from highs near $7.72/MMBtu in January to around $3.00/MMBtu recently, amplified by BOIL's 2x leverage and futures market contango (where future contracts trade at higher prices than spot, leading to roll decay).
  • Macro factors including ample U.S. production, steady LNG exports, and global supply stability outweighed weather-driven volatility.
  • Fund outflows exceeded $40 million in the recent month, signaling reduced investor interest in leveraged natural gas exposure.

Understanding ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) and Its Portfolio

As someone who follows leveraged commodity ETFs closely, I find BOIL particularly interesting for its structure. The ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) is a leveraged exchange-traded fund (ETF) designed to deliver two times (2x) the daily performance of the Bloomberg Natural Gas Subindex, before fees and expenses. This index tracks the price of natural gas futures contracts traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX), primarily Henry Hub contracts.

BOIL typically holds a concentrated portfolio dominated by natural gas futures, such as May 2026 and July 2026 contracts, representing over 150% exposure through derivatives, offset by cash and treasuries (AUM approximately $400 million). With effectively one primary asset class—natural gas futures—this structure amplifies short-term moves in commodity prices but introduces volatility decay from daily resets and contango in futures markets.

Recent price behavior reflects declining natural gas futures amid sufficient supply and waning seasonal demand, exacerbated by the fund's leverage. From what I see, this setup makes it a tool for tactical trades rather than long-term holds.

BOIL's Price Performance: 30-Day Drop vs. Quarterly View

Looking at the charts, over the last 30 days, BOIL's price fell from approximately $18.23 to $14.36, a decline of -21%. The movement was volatile and trend-driven downward, with sharp drops in early April following peaks around $21 in early March, influenced by fluctuating weather outlooks and steady production.

For the past quarter, BOIL declined -9% from around $15.73 to $14.36. Performance showed extreme swings—a surge in January from cold weather, followed by a steady retreat as temperatures moderated and inventories rebuilt. Overall, the quarter was range-bound lower after the initial spike. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the ETF compares to others in the energy sector.

Factors Behind BOIL's 30-Day Price Decline

In my view, BOIL's 30-day downturn tracked a similar decline in natural gas futures, with Henry Hub spot prices easing from above $3.60 in February to around $3.04 by early April. Milder weather forecasts reduced anticipated heating demand, leading to smaller-than-expected storage withdrawals reported by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA).

The ETF's futures-heavy portfolio, including front-month contracts, faced headwinds from a contango market structure, where rolling contracts incurs losses as near-term prices are lower than longer-dated ones. This roll yield decay, combined with 2x leverage, magnified the impact of roughly -10% to -15% drops in underlying futures.

Market sentiment shifted bearish on ample U.S. production offsetting any global LNG disruptions, with fund flows showing net outflows as traders rotated from volatile commodities. No major sector news disrupted supply, keeping pressure on prices. One thing that stands out is how these structural elements consistently weigh on performance in non-trending markets.

Quarterly Performance Drivers for BOIL

The quarter's -9% drop masked volatility: BOIL spiked over 100% in January as Henry Hub hit $7.72/MMBtu amid Winter Storm Fern, which curtailed production and spiked heating demand. Prices then collapsed over 60% into March as weather normalized, inventories refilled above five-year averages, and production rebounded.

Cumulative forces included post-winter surplus storage, steady dry gas output growth (up 2% expected for 2026), and LNG export ramps that failed to tighten domestic supply amid mild conditions. Leverage amplified the January rally but accelerated decay during the multi-week selloff, with contango eroding returns in sideways trading. Institutional outflows totaling hundreds of millions further pressured shares. I'm watching these inventory builds closely, as they often set the tone for the shoulder season.

Why I Use Tickeron’s AI Screener in My Research

In my own trading and analysis, I rely on Tickeron’s AI Screener to efficiently filter through stocks and ETFs like BOIL. This AI-powered tool scans thousands of assets using customizable filters for technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals—such as industry peers, market cap, indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. It helps spot trade ideas, breakouts, and opportunities in areas like leveraged commodities far quicker than manual methods. For investors tracking volatile energy plays, it's a practical way to stay ahead with data-driven insights.

Outlook for BOIL: Key Factors to Monitor

Looking ahead, investors should monitor EIA weekly natural gas storage reports for surpluses or deficits relative to five-year averages, as deviations signal supply tightness. Upcoming weather patterns, particularly summer cooling demand or next winter's cold snaps, could sway futures prices.

Track U.S. LNG export volumes and new pipeline capacity in regions like the Permian Basin, alongside production levels from key players. Geopolitical events affecting global LNG flows, interest rate shifts impacting commodity demand, and futures curve shape (contango vs. backwardation) remain critical. Risks include prolonged leverage decay in range-bound markets and counterparty exposure in derivatives. This is important because these elements often dictate whether leveraged ETFs like BOIL rebound or continue drifting.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

Related Ticker: BOIL

Contributor

My name is Jimmy, and I’m a financial analyst. I’m passionate about identifying the most promising ETFs for trading. Every day, I review hundreds of ETFs in search of trading and investment signals based on a variety of factors. I actively use technical analysis to identify short-term opportunities, including channels, indicators, support and resistance levels, and more. I also spend a great deal of time researching ETFs from a long-term investment perspective. My goal is to build a balanced ETF portfolio that combines investment-oriented and speculative ETFs and performs effectively during both market rallies and corrections.


Momentum Indicator for BOIL turns negative, indicating new downward trend

BOIL saw its Momentum Indicator move below the 0 level on August 21, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new downward move. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 83 similar instances where the indicator turned negative. In of the 83 cases, the stock moved further down in the following days. The odds of a decline are at .

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where BOIL declined for three days, the price rose further in of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

The Aroon Indicator for BOIL entered a downward trend on August 13, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where BOIL's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, of 33 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are .

The Stochastic Oscillator is in the oversold zone. Keep an eye out for a move up in the foreseeable future.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for BOIL just turned positive on August 10, 2026. Looking at past instances where BOIL's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in of 45 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

Following a 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where BOIL advanced for three days, in of 303 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

BOIL may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

Industry description

The investment seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times (2x) the daily performance of the Bloomberg Natural Gas SubindexSM. The fund seeks to meet its investment objective by investing normally in Natural Gas futures contracts. It may also invest in swaps if the market for a specific futures contract experiences emergencies (e.g., natural disaster, terrorist attack, or an act of God) or disruptions (e.g., a trading halt or a flash crash) or in situations where the Sponsor deems it impractical or inadvisable to buy or sell futures contracts (such as during periods of market volatility or illiquidity).
View a ticker or compare two or three
BOIL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
Last 5 trading days
A.I. Advisor
published General Information

General Information

Category Trading

Profile
Details
Category
Trading--Leveraged Commodities
Address
ProShares Trust II7501 WISCONSIN AVEBethesda
Phone
240-497-6400
Web
www.proshares.com
Interact to see
Advertisement
ERII shares have remained resilient, trading near $15.47 ahead of Q4 and full-year 2025 earnings scheduled for February 25, 2026. Q3 2025 results exceeded expectations, with revenue of $32 million and EPS of $0.07, despite year-over-year declines tied to project timing.
Liberty Broadband Corporation (LBRDA) has experienced pronounced swings in recent weeks, touching multiyear lows before staging a sharp recovery. The stock continues to trade within a wide 52-week range, closely tied to the value of its Charter Communications stake and investor expectations around the proposed merger.
Arm Holdings (ARM) shares have demonstrated resilience in recent sessions, rebounding after an initial earnings-related pullback and stabilizing near technical support levels. While smartphone-related headwinds tied to memory shortages pressured sentiment, momentum in AI-driven data center royalties helped restore confidence.
Shell plc (SHEL) reported Q4 2025 adjusted earnings of $3.3 billion, below expectations due to weaker oil prices and non-cash tax charges. Full-year adjusted earnings reached $18.5 billion, supported by strong LNG and upstream operations. A 4% dividend increase to $0.372 per share and a new $3.5 billion buyback program reinforce capital return commitments.
Linde (LIN) reported Q4 2025 adjusted EPS of $4.20, topping estimates, with full-year revenue reaching $34 billion. 2026 EPS guidance of $17.40–$17.90 implies 6–9% growth, supported by a record $10 billion project backlog.
ConocoPhillips (COP) reported Q4 2025 adjusted EPS of $1.02, missing estimates due to weaker oil prices. Full-year adjusted earnings totaled $7.7 billion, with $19.9 billion in operating cash flow. Shares have gained more than 10% in recent weeks, supported by analyst upgrades and sector momentum.
Verisk Analytics (VRSK) delivered Q4 2025 revenue of $779 million, up 5.9% year over year, with adjusted EPS of $1.82, beating expectations. Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) reported Q3 FY2026 revenue of $2.62 billion, down 10.2% year over year, but adjusted diluted EPS climbed 14% to $1.77, well above estimates.
(OMC) Omnicom’s fourth-quarter report, released February 18, 2026, marked its first earnings update incorporating results from Interpublic Group (IPG), acquired on November 26, 2025. The combination created the world’s largest marketing services firm by revenue, a significant milestone as the advertising industry consolidates and adapts to digital transformation.
Copart (CPRT) is set to report fiscal Q2 2026 earnings on February 19, 2026, after market close. Consensus calls for EPS of $0.39–$0.40 and revenue of $1.15–$1.18 billion. Global Payments (GPN) posted Q4 2025 adjusted EPS of $3.18, in line with expectations, and adjusted net revenue of $2.32 billion, up 6% in constant currency (excluding dispositions). Thomson Reuters (TRI) delivered Q4 2025 adjusted EPS of $1.07 and revenue of $2.01 billion, up 5% year over year, supported by recurring subscription growth.
Unilever PLC (UL) leads year-to-date performance with a 12.61% gain, ahead of Diageo plc (DEO) at 9.90% and Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. (KDP) at 4.27%. DEO offers the highest dividend yield at 4.35%, compared with KDP (3.16%) and UL (2.97%). All three stocks carry low betas—DEO (0.18), UL (0.24), and KDP (0.35)—highlighting their defensive characteristics.
Q1 Fiscal 2026 Results: Revenue of $333M and adjusted EBITDA of $50M (15% margin), exceeding analyst expectations. FY2026 Guidance Raised: Adjusted EBITDA now projected at $225M, with revenue reaffirmed near $1.5B. EV Backlog Growth: 855 electric buses worth $277M, highlighting robust demand supported by EPA clean bus funding.
IBM fell over 10% today mainly because a new AI tool from Anthropic is seen as a direct threat to IBM’s lucrative COBOL modernization and consulting business, triggering worries that key legacy‑modernization revenue will be automated away.
Today’s drop is mainly about competitive positioning and future growth expectations, not an immediate collapse of current Wegovy/Ozempic sales, but it signals that Novo may not have the strongest next‑wave obesity drug versus Eli Lilly, which is why the stock sold off so sharply.
RNG (RingCentral) dropped over 12% today mainly as a sharp pullback after a very steep recent run‑up driven by upbeat Q4 results, guidance, and capital‑return news, with profit‑taking amplified by valuation concerns and a weak broader tech tap
Fundamentally, the latest public guidance is still for rapid growth and profitability, but today’s drop reflects a reset of sentiment and valuation rather than a brand‑new deterioration in those targets. For investors, the key question is whether the current price appropriately reflects execution risk, competition in diagnostics, and macro volatility after the guidance‑driven rally and subsequent reversal.
TNC (Tennant Company) is down more than 25% today because it reported a very large earnings and revenue miss for Q4 2025, blamed on serious ERP rollout problems and weaker demand, and guided to a slower‑than‑hoped recovery in 2026.
XMTR (Xometry) is down more than 21% today because, despite reporting record growth and an earnings beat, the company announced a CEO transition and investors used the news to take profits after a big prior run‑up, with heavy short interest amplifying the drop.
EDSA (Edesa Biotech) is up more than 21% today largely on speculative trading in a very illiquid penny stock with no clear, company‑specific news catalyst, likely driven by technical factors, retail flows, and short‑term trading rather than fundamentals.
Q4 2025 revenue came in strong at about 214–215 million, up mid‑30s percent year over year and a few percent above estimates, but GAAP EPS was only 0.08 versus expectations around 0.31, a roughly 70–75% miss and down from 0.13 a year earlier.
Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (EL) has rebounded with ~12% YTD gains and 50%+ one-year returns, supported by margin improvements and strong skincare/fragrance demand despite broader prestige beauty challenges.