Go to the list of all blogs
Sergey Savastiouk's Avatar
published in Blogs
Mar 10, 2026
TickeronGET DAILY SIGNALS
Retail Rules the Dips: How Individual Investors Became the Market’s Shock Absorber

Retail Rules the Dips: How Individual Investors Became the Market’s Shock Absorber

Over the past seven years, one pattern has become remarkably consistent: individual investors buy more on down days than on up days. In 2026 that behavior has gone into overdrive, turning retail into the single most aggressive buyer of nearly every selloff and making their flows a critical input for any market outlook.

 

Key Takeaways

  • Average daily equity purchases by retail investors on S&P 500 down days in 2026 are at the highest level on record, running about 100% above the peak intensity seen during the 2021 meme‑stock boom.
     
  • Year‑to‑date, buying on down days is roughly 2.5× larger than on up days, and in February alone that ratio jumped to 4.3×, up from 2.1× in January.
     
  • Over the past two weeks, retail has continued to add aggressively on every dip, especially in beaten‑up tech and software, while doing relatively less net buying on green days—essentially “averaging down” into volatility.
     
  • This pattern creates a soft floor under sharp selloffs, but it also raises the risk that retail becomes over‑concentrated and heavily margined if a deeper, more persistent bear phase arrives.
     

How Much Is Retail Buying the Latest Dips?

Without live access to brokerage flow data, we can’t quote precise dollar amounts for the past two weeks, but we can reasonably extend the described patterns into the current environment:

  • Given that 2026 down‑day buying is already double 2021’s extremes, it’s highly likely that the heavy volatility and headlines of the last two weeks (Iran war, oil spike and reversal, tech rotation) have kept that down‑day / up‑day ratio elevated.
     
  • In practice, this means:
     
    • On sessions where the S&P 500 sells off, retail buyers are stepping in with purchase volumes multiple times larger than what they deploy on up days.
       
    • Their focus, consistent with recent reports, is on high‑beta, story‑rich names (AI/software, popular tech, select energy and defense stocks) plus broad ETFs that let them “buy the market” cheaply.
       
  • The behavior is very similar to what we saw in early 2021—but larger and more systematic: instead of sporadic frenzies, 2026 data show a steady, rule‑like tendency to buy weakness much more aggressively than strength.
     

Short term, that has two important implications:

  • Sharp intraday or multi‑day corrections can stabilize faster than institutions expect, because retail flow rushes in at lower prices, dampening crash risk.
     
  • However, if the macro backdrop deteriorates (earnings recession, credit accident, or prolonged geopolitical shock), retail could find itself holding the bag at high positioning and limited dry powder, which can turn a “buy‑the‑dip” crowd into forced sellers.
     

 

How Tickeron’s AI Tools Can Help Retail Investors Avoid Becoming the Exit Liquidity

If you’re part of this dip‑buying wave, the key question is not whether buying dips “works” in general—it often does in bull markets—but how to know when a routine pullback is turning into a structural regime change. This is where systematic, AI‑driven tools like Tickeron’s can help transform aggressive buying into disciplined strategy.

Here’s how:

  • Regime detection instead of gut feel
    AI models trained on decades of market data can distinguish between:
     
    • Normal bull‑market pullbacks (where buying dips has positive expectancy), and
       
    • Transitional phases into bear markets or high‑volatility regimes (where averaging down is dangerous).
      When the statistical regime flips, the system can automatically reduce risk, rather than continuing to buy every new low.
       
  • Position sizing and risk controls for serial dip‑buyers
    Many retail traders keep adding on every red day without a plan. AI‑driven strategies can:
     
    • Cap exposure to any single stock or theme (e.g., AI, meme names).
       
    • Scale trade size according to volatility and unrealized drawdown, so you don’t double down mindlessly into a deteriorating trend.
       
    • Use objective exit rules—trailing stops, time‑based exits, or signal‑based liquidations—so you don’t become trapped in a “never sell” mentality.
       
  • Focusing dip‑buying where probabilities are better
    Not all dips are equal. AI can help filter for:
     
    • Stocks with improving fundamentals and strong balance sheets rather than pure hype.
       
    • Setups where prior dips in similar conditions historically led to favorable risk‑reward, instead of chasing every fallen knife.
       

For individual investors who are already the market’s most aggressive dip‑buyers, adding this type of AI‑based structure can be the difference between being the smart liquidity that buys value and simply being the exit liquidity for more sophisticated players.

Tickeron AI Perspective

 Disclaimers and Limitations

Related Ticker: SPY, QQQ, IWM

Contributor

Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.


SPY in upward trend: price may ascend as a result of having broken its lower Bollinger Band on November 05, 2026

SPY may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 35 of 37 cases where SPY's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 38 of 44 cases where SPY's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 86%.

Following a +2.69% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where SPY advanced for three days, in 291 of 353 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 82%.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 29, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on SPY as a result. In 57 of 76 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 75%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for SPY turned negative on October 15, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 51 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 39 of the 51 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 76%.

SPY moved below its 50-day moving average on November 05, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.

The 10-day moving average for SPY crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 30, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 11 of 15 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 73%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where SPY declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 76%.

The Aroon Indicator for SPY entered a downward trend on November 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Notable companies

The most notable companies in this group are Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL), NVIDIA Corp (NASDAQ:NVDA), Microsoft Corp (NASDAQ:MSFT), Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL), Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG), Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN), Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META), Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA), Broadcom Inc. (NASDAQ:AVGO), Eli Lilly & Co (NYSE:LLY).

Industry description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before expenses, correspond generally to the price and yield performance of the S&P 500® Index. The trust seeks to achieve its investment objective by holding a portfolio of the common stocks that are included in the index (the “Portfolio”), with the weight of each stock in the Portfolio substantially corresponding to the weight of such stock in the index.

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) ETF is 150.44B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 7.11B to 5T. AAPL holds the highest valuation in this group at 5T. The lowest valued company is MOS at 7.11B.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) ETF was 21%. For the same ETF, the average monthly price growth was 56%, and the average quarterly price growth was 355%. AMD experienced the highest price growth at 45%, while AXON experienced the biggest fall at -20%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) ETF was -34%. For the same stocks of the ETF, the average monthly volume growth was 13% and the average quarterly volume growth was -25%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating: 70
P/E Growth Rating: 51
Price Growth Rating: 39
SMR Rating: 50
Profit Risk Rating: 58
Seasonality Score: 17 (-100 ... +100)
AI Screener 3
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMD fell -5.03% to $555.85 in regular-session trading Friday, down -$29.45 from Thursday's close of $585.30, as of 9:42 a.m. ET shortly after the opening bell. No verified company-specific news or fundamental catalyst found: the decline tracks a broad semiconductor pullback and is consistent with profit-taking after a +44.7% rebound from the Nov. 5 close of $404.40, with the stock's typical daily swing running at 3.6%.
NBIS fell from $154.69 to $129.12, down -16.53%, with the decline starting in premarket trading and continuing through the regular session. The drop followed Q3 results: revenue of $980.8M (+571% YoY) beat estimates, but management cut 2026 revenue guidance to the low end of its range on third-party capacity delays and raised 2026 capex to roughly $27B, reviving financing and execution fears.
BZ dropped sharply, sliding from a $16.72 prior close to $13.48 (-19.38%), with the decline beginning in premarket and deepening into the early regular session. No verified company-specific news or fundamental catalyst was issued; the fall tracked a broad China ADR selloff (the Nasdaq Golden Dragon index slid more than 2%), but that alone is too small to explain a ~20% drop — the stock's Hong Kong listing fell only -2.6%.
The $290 central target is the arithmetic mean of 12 verified analyst price targets (rounded from roughly $293), with a wide range of about $126 to $410. Shares traded near $155 on the eve of the third-quarter report before falling roughly 17% to 22% after full-year guidance disappointed, widening the gap to the target.
IREN dropped -7.58% during regular trading, sliding from a $20.84 prior close to $19.26. A broad AI/neocloud sector sell-off drove the decline, after a Reuters report raised concerns over Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang's leadership and Nebius guided its 2026 revenue toward the low end of its range.