Go to the list of all blogs
Arthur Evans's Avatar
published in Blogs
Aug 13, 2026
Sabesp (SBS) Reports Q2 2026 Earnings: Net Income Declines 31.4%

Sabesp (SBS) Reports Q2 2026 Earnings: Net Income Declines 31.4%

Key Takeaways

  • Reported net income came in at R$1.46 billion for Q2 2026, down 31.4% year over year and just below the R$1.53 billion consensus compiled by LSEG.
  • Total net revenue rose 13.9% to R$10.21 billion, while adjusted net revenue grew 6.7% to R$6.01 billion.
  • Reported EBITDA held roughly flat at R$3.91 billion; adjusted EBITDA declined 3.2% to R$3.50 billion, with the adjusted margin narrowing to 58.3%.
  • Net financial expenses widened sharply to negative R$1.02 billion from negative R$118 million a year earlier, reflecting higher debt.
  • Net debt reached R$34.0 billion at the end of June, with leverage at 2.5 times net debt to EBITDA.
  • First-half capital expenditures rose 15.6% to about R$7.5 billion, keeping the company on track for its roughly R$20 billion 2026 investment plan.

Why These Results Matter

Sabesp is Latin America’s largest water and sewage utility and the primary sanitation provider for São Paulo state. Its quarterly updates draw attention because the company is in the middle of a multi-year universalization program that will require billions of reais in spending through 2029. The Q2 2026 numbers are therefore less about headline growth and more about what they show regarding margins, financing costs, and the speed of infrastructure delivery. In my view, investors are also tracking how tariff adjustments, subsidized social tariffs, and rising leverage interact as the investment cycle intensifies.

Breaking Down the Reported Results

Sabesp released its second-quarter 2026 results on August 12, after the close of U.S. markets, for the period ended June 30, 2026.

Total net revenue, including construction activity, rose 13.9% year over year to R$10.21 billion. Adjusted net revenue advanced 6.7% to R$6.01 billion, while reported revenue from sanitation services reached R$6.59 billion, up 12.1% and slightly above the R$6.34 billion consensus compiled by LSEG. The top line benefited from an 8.7% increase in net prices after tariff adjustments and a 1.0% contribution from new connections, partially offset by milder weather and a shift in the customer mix toward subsidized social tariffs.

Reported net income fell 31.4% to R$1.46 billion from R$2.14 billion a year earlier, landing just below the R$1.53 billion analyst estimate. Adjusted net income declined 41.2% to R$1.15 billion, pressured by a 24.5% rise in operating costs and expenses and a much larger negative financial result of R$1.02 billion, compared with a R$118 million loss a year earlier. The company also noted that the year-ago adjusted comparison was helped by roughly R$200 million in provision reversals and judicial wins.

Reported EBITDA was essentially stable at R$3.91 billion. Adjusted EBITDA decreased 3.2% to R$3.50 billion, and the adjusted EBITDA margin narrowed to 58.3% from 64.2%. Adjusted earnings per share were R$0.33, down from R$0.57 a year earlier, reflecting the five-for-one stock split approved in April 2026. Second-quarter capital expenditures reached R$3.73 billion, up 3.6% year over year, bringing first-half investment to about R$7.5 billion. I also checked sector comparisons using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock stacks up against other utilities on fundamentals and recent performance.

Market Reaction and Investor Focus

Because Sabesp reported after the U.S. market close on August 12, the clearest ADR reaction will emerge during the August 13 trading session and the company’s earnings call. Since reported net income landed close to consensus, the results are unlikely to be viewed as a major headline surprise. Instead, attention is likely to center on the decline in adjusted profitability, the jump in financing costs, and the increase in leverage to 2.5 times net debt to EBITDA.

Heading into the report, analysts had projected net income of R$1.53 billion and EBITDA of R$3.76 billion, according to LSEG. The modest gap between expectations and reported figures suggests investors will pay more attention to the balance sheet and the pace of capital deployment than to a simple earnings beat or miss.

Forward Outlook and Factors to Monitor

Investors will be watching whether Sabesp can maintain its investment rhythm while containing leverage. The company is targeting roughly R$20 billion in capital expenditures for 2026, part of a plan to meet universal water and sewage access goals in São Paulo state by 2029. With net debt at R$34.0 billion and leverage at 2.5 times, the pace and funding mix of future capex will remain central to the investment case.

Tariff dynamics are another key variable. Revenue continues to benefit from regulated tariff adjustments, but the expansion of subsidized social tariffs is diluting the revenue mix. Management is also advancing regulatory discussions, including a commercial discount policy for large clients and new regulatory accounting principles, which could influence revenue and margins in the second half of the year.

Cost control, energy expenses, and the ramp-up of major projects such as the Integra Tietê program will also matter. Finally, any update on potential participation in the Copasa privatization process, likely in partnership with Equatorial, and progress on operational efficiency initiatives could shape the outlook beyond the quarterly numbers. From what I see, these elements will determine how the story develops from here.

Enhancing Analysis with AI Tools

In my own research on utilities and earnings reactions, Tickeron’s AI Screener has proven helpful for quickly filtering peers by industry, fundamentals, and technical signals. It surfaces relevant ideas efficiently and supports more informed comparisons during reporting seasons like this one.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Related Ticker: SBS

Contributor

Financial writer and active order flow futures trader with a focus on fundamental analysis, macroeconomic factors, and equity research. I make in-depth blogs on stocks and ETFs, bridging the gap between raw market data and real-world trading decisions.


SBS's RSI Oscillator ascends from oversold territory

The RSI Oscillator for SBS moved out of oversold territory on August 24, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 18 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In of the 18 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at .

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on August 27, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on SBS as a result. In of 81 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for SBS just turned positive on August 26, 2026. Looking at past instances where SBS's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in of 53 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

Following a 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where SBS advanced for three days, in of 302 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 5 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.

The 10-day moving average for SBS crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on July 31, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In of 16 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

The 50-day moving average for SBS moved below the 200-day moving average on September 04, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where SBS declined for three days, the price rose further in of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

SBS broke above its upper Bollinger Band on September 02, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

The Aroon Indicator for SBS entered a downward trend on August 31, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 87, placing this stock better than average.

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.043) is normal, around the industry mean (2.062). P/E Ratio (11.045) is within average values for comparable stocks, (26.131). SBS's Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is very low in comparison to the industry average of (2.668). SBS's Dividend Yield (0.007) is considerably lower than the industry average of (0.025). SBS's P/S Ratio (2.251) is slightly lower than the industry average of (4.435).

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. SBS’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

Industry description

Water utilities operate water treatment plants, and/or distribute water to residential and commercial customers. Companies operating in this industry are largely responsible for the safe and timely distribution of water. While most water systems are local or regional, some of the companies might have operations across several states. The industry is expected to be closely monitored by regulators for quality checks on the water being distributed. Investing in upgrading infrastructure is a major factor in bolstering the supply of clean/safe-to-use water. Given the absolute necessity of water in our lives, the industry is largely non-cyclical. American Water Works Company, Inc., Aqua America, Inc., American States Water Co. and California Water Service Group are some of the major water utilities companies in the U.S.

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the Water Utilities Industry is 5.87B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 41.88K to 27.96B. AWK holds the highest valuation in this group at 27.96B. The lowest valued company is AEPT at 41.88K.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the Water Utilities Industry was 0%. For the same Industry, the average monthly price growth was 5%, and the average quarterly price growth was 6%. SBS experienced the highest price growth at 6%, while GWRS experienced the biggest fall at -3%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the Water Utilities Industry was -57%. For the same stocks of the Industry, the average monthly volume growth was 47% and the average quarterly volume growth was 928%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating: 76
P/E Growth Rating: 33
Price Growth Rating: 47
SMR Rating: 72
Profit Risk Rating: 86
Seasonality Score: -51 (-100 ... +100)
View a ticker or compare two or three
SBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
Last 5 trading days
A.I. Advisor
published General Information

General Information

an operator of water, sewage and industrial wastewater systems

Industry WaterUtilities

Profile
Details
Industry
Water Utilities
Address
Rua Costa Carvalho, 300
Phone
+55 1133888247
Employees
11170
Web
https://www.sabesp.com.br
Interact to see
Advertisement
Netflix dropped out of a months‑long bidding war for Warner Bros Discovery after Paramount/Skydance raised their offer, and Netflix refused to match it, saying the new price was “no longer financially appealing.” The stock jumped roughly 10%+ on the news as investors read this as fiscal discipline—management chose not to overpay, which protects the balance sheet and future returns instead of chasing scale at any price.
SE shares plunged approximately 23% at Tuesday's open, marking one of the steepest single-session selloffs in recent company history. The primary catalyst was a severe Q4 2025 earnings miss: adjusted EPS of $0.63 fell well short of the analyst consensus of $0.80, a miss of roughly 21%.
Shares of Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) are down 10.32% in Tuesday's session, trading at $196.27 versus the prior close of $218.85 — a single-day loss of $22.58 per share. The primary catalyst is a Bank of America downgrade issued on March 2, cutting SCCO from Neutral to Underperform, which triggered accelerating sell pressure into Tuesday's open.
MDB shares plummeted approximately 26.44% on March 3, 2026, closing around $238.24, down from a prior close of approximately $322.55. The primary catalyst was weaker-than-expected fiscal Q1 2027 guidance, with non-GAAP EPS projected at $1.15–$1.19 versus analyst expectations of roughly $1.46.
Shares of Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) are surging approximately +130% in Tuesday's session, with the stock hitting a fresh 52-week high as of intraday trading on March 3, 2026. The dominant catalyst is a sharp escalation of U.S.-Israel-Iran military tensions, with Tehran restricting access to the Strait of Hormuz — triggering a spike in crude oil futures and a broad-based energy sector rally.
Shares of CRDO dropped 18.55% on March 3, 2026, falling from a prior close of $114.22 to approximately $93.03. The primary catalyst was a "sell the news" reaction to fiscal Q3 2026 earnings — despite beating consensus estimates on both revenue and EPS, the market sold off on forward margin compression guidance.
PSIX shares plummeted approximately 25.37% on March 3, 2026, closing near $64.00 versus the prior session's close of $85.75. The primary catalyst was the company's Q4 and full-year 2025 earnings report, which revealed Q4 net income fell 31% year-over-year to $16.1 million despite a 33% revenue increase.
Life360 Inc Common (LIF) stunned many traders today as the stock slid more than 20% despite reporting what, on the surface, looked like very strong results: revenue up roughly 32% year over year to about $489.5 million and the company’s first-ever full‑year profitability.
StoneCo Ltd. (STNE) shares dropped more than 15% today after the market reacted negatively to the company’s latest Q4 2025 and full‑year results and its updated outlook. While StoneCo delivered year‑over‑year revenue and earnings growth and even topped EPS expectations, investors focused on weaker‑than‑hoped revenue numbers, rising credit risk metrics, and a more cautious medium‑term guidance profile, which together triggered a sharp rerating of the stock.
Alamo Group reported Q4 2025 EPS of about 1.70 dollars, well below analyst expectations that were in the low‑2 dollar range, producing a sizable negative earnings surprise. Quarterly revenue came in around 373.7 million dollars, down roughly 3% year over year and about 7–8% below consensus estimates near 405 million dollars, signaling softer demand than the market anticipated.
Hycroft Mining Holding Corp (HYMC) shares slid more than 12% today as traders digested the company’s newly filed 2025 annual report, a major corporate update, and an extended development timeline that shifts the story further away from near‑term production and cash flow.
PicS (PICS) shares dropped more than 12% today as investors reacted to mounting concerns about valuation, elevated volatility, and uncertainty ahead of the company’s next earnings report later in March.
Shares of MOBX surged approximately +532.77% in the March 3, 2026 trading session, closing at $1.12 versus a prior close of $0.18. The primary catalyst was a major production purchase order from the U.S. Navy for components used in the Tomahawk cruise missile program.
DAKT shares are declining approximately -10% in Wednesday's session, trading near $23.91, compared to the prior close of approximately $26.57. The primary catalyst is the pre-market release of fiscal Q3 2026 earnings, in which diluted EPS of $0.06 fell significantly short of the consensus estimate of approximately $0.13–$0.15.
Shares of HRZN plunged approximately 23% in Wednesday's trading session — one of the steepest single-day declines in the company's recent history. Primary catalyst: Q4 2025 earnings released after the close on March 3 revealed net investment income (NII) per share of just $0.18, badly missing the consensus estimate of $0.26 and marking a steep sequential decline.
Palantir (PLTR) is outperforming a struggling market, rallying strongly over the past few sessions while approaching a critical resistance level near $143. With geopolitical tensions rising and defense analytics demand growing, the stock sits at a pivotal technical moment that could determine its next major move.
Investors holding record levels of protective puts means downside is heavily hedged, which often dampens crash risk but supports higher implied volatility (VIX) in the short run. The fact that the S&P 500 and Nasdaq are rising while hedging is surging suggests a “wall of worry” market: people are bullish enough to stay in, but nervous enough to pay up for insurance.
During the week of 9–15 February 2026, major U.S. equity indices finished lower overall, while Tickeron’s trending AI trading bots produced positive returns, particularly in defense and energy—two areas now directly affected by the newly opened war in Iran. With macro risk rising and volatility picking up, this divergence matters: it shows how sector‑focused, rules‑based AI strategies can still find upside when broad index exposure is negative.
Investors are furiously hedging against a potential credit market crash, just as geopolitical risk explodes with a new war in Iran. Put option open interest on major U.S. credit ETFs like HYG, JNK, LQD, and BKLN has surged to a record ~11.5 million contracts, doubling over the last 12 months and already exceeding the 2022 bear‑market peak of 10 million.
The current gap between single‑stock implied volatility and index volatility is back near October 2008 extremes, signaling that investors expect idiosyncratic risk (stock‑specific jumps) to dominate.