As Manhattan’s largest office landlord, SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG) serves as a closely watched barometer for the broader New York City commercial real estate market. The company operates as a real estate investment trust (REIT), a structure that requires it to distribute most of its taxable income to shareholders as dividends. Its quarterly results therefore carry outsized significance for investors gauging the health of office leasing demand, occupancy trends, and rent pricing in a market still normalizing after the post-pandemic shift in workplace patterns. The third quarter report offered fresh evidence on whether premium Manhattan office assets continue to attract tenants and whether the company’s leasing and capital-markets strategy is translating into stronger property-level cash flow. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.
SLG posted diluted EPS of $1.01 for the third quarter of 2026, a substantial improvement from $0.34 in the same period last year. Funds From Operations, the preferred earnings gauge for REITs, came in at $1.59 per diluted share, up from $1.58 a year earlier but slightly below the FactSet consensus estimate of $1.65. Total revenue reached $273.0 million, an increase from $244.8 million in the third quarter of 2025. On the operating side, Manhattan same-store cash NOI, including the company’s share from unconsolidated joint ventures, grew 5.0% for the quarter and 4.2% for the first nine months of 2026, excluding lease termination income. Manhattan same-store office occupancy climbed to 95.0% as of September 30, 2026, inclusive of leases signed but not yet commenced, reflecting continued leasing momentum across the portfolio. The company also reported significant balance-sheet activity. In October, SL Green and its joint venture partner closed on a $2.0 billion refinancing of 245 Park Avenue through a single-asset, single-borrower commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) execution, replacing the property’s prior $1.768 billion of mortgage and mezzanine financing. From what I see, the refinancing details add useful context on how the firm is managing its capital structure.
Investor response to the third quarter results was measured. While FFO came in modestly below the FactSet consensus estimate, the sharp year-over-year improvement in net income EPS and the continued rise in occupancy were viewed as encouraging signs for the Manhattan office portfolio. The stock closed at $46.68 ahead of the report, and early after-hours trading indicated a modestly positive reaction, with shares advancing in the low single digits. Sentiment around SL Green remains tied to the durability of office leasing demand, the pace at which occupancy gains convert into higher cash NOI, and the company’s ability to manage refinancing costs in a higher-rate environment.
Following this report, investors will be watching whether SL Green’s leasing pipeline continues to translate signed leases into commenced occupancy and higher cash NOI. Management has previously set a target of reaching 95.0% Manhattan same-store office occupancy by December 31, 2026, a goal the company has now already achieved ahead of schedule. The key question is whether that occupancy level can be sustained and expanded while preserving rent pricing power. Capital-markets execution remains another important theme. The recent $2.0 billion refinancing of 245 Park Avenue highlights the company’s ability to access financing, but interest costs remain a headwind for the broader office REIT sector. Investors will likely monitor future refinancing activity, debt levels, and the interest-rate environment for their impact on earnings and FFO. Additionally, the company has previously raised its 2026 FFO guidance, signaling confidence in recurring earnings growth. With the company’s Annual Institutional Investor Conference scheduled for December 7, 2026, further commentary on guidance, leasing activity, and capital allocation could serve as the next meaningful catalyst. As always, the trajectory of Manhattan office demand, tenant concessions, and mark-to-market rent growth will be central to evaluating the company’s forward performance.
In my regular workflow, I rely on Tickeron’s AI Screener to quickly filter REITs by occupancy trends, NOI growth, and balance-sheet metrics. It helps surface comparable names and technical patterns without hours of manual screening, giving me a clearer picture of where SLG stands relative to peers.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.
Moving higher for three straight days is viewed as a bullish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future growth. Considering data from situations where SLG advanced for three days, in 216 of 304 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 71%.
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where SLG's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 20 of 39 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 51%.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 3 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
SLG may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 14, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on SLG as a result. In 54 of 77 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 70%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for SLG turned negative on October 14, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 45 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 31 of the 45 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 69%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where SLG declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 75%.
The Aroon Indicator for SLG entered a downward trend on October 21, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 57 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. SLG’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 65 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 82 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.093) is normal, around the industry mean (0.873). SLG has a moderately high P/E Ratio (653.875) as compared to the industry average of (201.021). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.300) is also within normal values, averaging (0.666). Dividend Yield (0.041) settles around the average of (0.163) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.937) is also within normal values, averaging (2.856).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 92 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. SLG’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 93, placing this stock worse than average.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
a real estate investment trust
Industry REITOffice