Investors comparing real estate ETFs often place SPRE and XLRE side by side, yet the two funds sit in different corners of the same asset class. SPRE offers Sharia-compliant, globally diversified property exposure, while XLRE delivers concentrated, low-cost access to the largest U.S. real estate companies in the S&P 500. They do not compete directly on geography or strategy, but they do compete for the same investor goal: diversified income and inflation-hedged property exposure. Understanding their structural differences in sector exposure and relative positioning is essential before choosing between them in the current rate-sensitive environment. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the funds compare on key metrics.
SPRE tracks a market-cap-weighted index of Sharia-compliant global real estate investment trusts (REITs), drawn from the broader S&P Global BMI Shariah Index. Launched in December 2020, the fund holds roughly 31 to 33 positions and carries a 0.50% expense ratio. As a passive, non-diversified fund, it excludes securities that violate Islamic finance principles, which typically removes businesses with material interest-bearing debt or prohibited revenue streams. Its portfolio is global rather than domestic, with meaningful weight in Australian names such as Goodman Group and Charter Hall alongside U.S. holdings. Top positions include WELL, EQIX, PLD, and WY, with the top ten names historically accounting for roughly 78–79% of assets — a highly concentrated profile. Smaller asset base and lower trading volume make SPRE less liquid than its large-cap U.S. peers.
XLRE seeks to track the Real Estate Select Sector Index, a market-cap-weighted basket of U.S. real estate companies identified by the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS). Launched in October 2015 and managed by State Street, the fund holds about 33 to 34 stocks, is passive and non-diversified, and is rebalanced quarterly. Its 0.08% expense ratio is among the lowest in the sector. Exposure is essentially 100% U.S. equity, and the fund explicitly excludes mortgage REITs. Top holdings include WELL, PLD, EQIX, AMT, PSA, SPG, VTR, DLR, O, and CBRE. Specialized REITs — cell towers, data centers, and storage — dominate the mix, giving XLRE notable exposure to secular digital-infrastructure themes.
Both funds operate within a rate-sensitive real estate sector. Higher-for-longer interest-rate expectations have pressured REIT valuations by raising financing costs and making bond yields more competitive against property income. Within that backdrop, performance has diverged by property type: data centers and senior housing have shown resilience, while office, storage, and tower operators face more uneven demand. Digital-infrastructure names tied to artificial intelligence (AI) data-center buildouts have attracted capital, while logistics and healthcare REITs benefit from durable secular demand. Regulatory and geopolitical considerations add a second layer for SPRE, whose emerging-market holdings carry currency and governance risk that U.S.-focused XLRE does not face. From what I see, this environment favors funds with strong balance sheets and lower costs.
In recent weeks and months, XLRE has generally exhibited stronger trend consistency, supported by its concentration in large-cap U.S. REITs with healthier balance sheets and resilient earnings revisions. Its low-cost structure preserves more of the underlying dividend yield for shareholders. SPRE's global footprint has introduced greater volatility from foreign-exchange movements and regional property cycles, and its higher fee compounds that drag over time. While SPRE offers genuine geographic diversification, its relative positioning has lagged amid U.S.-led momentum in data-center and healthcare property names. From a volatility standpoint, SPRE's smaller, more concentrated portfolio has historically shown a higher beta profile than the more liquid, institutionally anchored XLRE. I’m watching this closely as rate expectations evolve.
One tool I frequently turn to when comparing funds like these is Tickeron’s AI Screener. It helps me quickly filter ETFs by technical patterns, fundamentals, and performance metrics, which adds useful context to the structural analysis above without replacing it.
Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently favor XLRE over SPRE. The rationale is probabilistic rather than predictive: XLRE offers a materially lower expense ratio (0.08% versus 0.50%), substantially greater liquidity and scale, cleaner U.S. large-cap exposure, and more consistent recent sector momentum driven by data-center and healthcare property demand. While SPRE provides valuable Sharia-compliant global diversification, its higher cost, smaller asset base, and greater currency and concentration risk weigh against it under current conditions. Investors seeking efficient, liquid U.S. real estate exposure with minimal fee drag would likely find XLRE the structurally stronger candidate.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for XLRE turned positive on October 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where XLRE's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 41 of 47 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 87%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 09, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on XLRE as a result. In 69 of 84 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 82%.
XLRE moved above its 50-day moving average on October 29, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for XLRE crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on November 02, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 12 of 17 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 71%.
Following a +3.39% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where XLRE advanced for three days, in 253 of 305 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 83%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 214 of 275 cases where XLRE Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 78%.
The 10-day RSI Indicator for XLRE moved out of overbought territory on November 05, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 29 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 26 of the 29 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 90%.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 3 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
The 50-day moving average for XLRE moved below the 200-day moving average on October 23, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where XLRE declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 84%.
XLRE broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 04, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Category RealEstate