Go to the list of all blogs
Alicia's Avatar
published in Blogs
Mar 13, 2026
Why Did ProFrac Holding Corp (ACDC) Stock Fall Over -11% Today?

Why Did ProFrac Holding Corp (ACDC) Stock Fall Over -11% Today?

ProFrac Holding Corp (ACDC), a U.S.-based, vertically integrated oilfield services company focused on hydraulic fracturing, proppant production, and related manufacturing, saw its stock drop more than 11% today. The selloff came immediately after the company reported its fourth-quarter and full-year 2025 results, which showed improving quarter‑on‑quarter trends but a clear deterioration versus 2024, alongside tighter credit terms and a still‑loss‑making profile. Investors responded by repricing the shares lower despite some operational progress in late 2025.

Key Takeaways

  • ACDC fell over 11% today following the release of Q4 and full‑year 2025 results, reversing part of a roughly 35–40% rally the stock had staged since late 2025.

  • Full‑year 2025 revenue declined to about $1.94 billion from $2.19 billion in 2024, while net loss widened to roughly $356 million versus a $208 million loss a year earlier; adjusted EBITDA margins compressed from 23% to 16%.​

  • Q4 2025 showed sequential improvement — revenue rose to $437 million from $403 million in Q3, and adjusted EBITDA increased to $61 million from $41 million — but results still underscored structural margin and profitability challenges.

  • The company also amended its main credit facility this month, extending maturity but reducing maximum availability to $275 million and tightening covenants, which highlighted lender caution and balance‑sheet constraints.

  • Analysts remain broadly cautious, with an average “Reduce”‑type stance and price targets implying limited upside, while industry headwinds in pressure pumping and proppant demand continue to weigh on sentiment.

For traders trying to interpret an 11% drop in a volatile small‑cap like ProFrac, AI‑powered tools have become an increasingly useful complement to traditional analysis. Tickeron’s AI engines continuously scan stocks such as ACDC for abnormal price gaps, volume spikes, and pattern shifts around key events like earnings and credit‑facility amendments. By digesting historical trading behavior, volatility bands, and technical levels, these systems can quickly flag when a stock is breaking down from a bullish pattern — such as the bullish pennant recently identified in ACDC — versus simply consolidating within an existing range. For active traders and risk‑focused investors, integrating AI‑driven screeners, pattern‑recognition models, and portfolio‑risk dashboards can provide a more objective view of whether a move like today’s signals a potential opportunity or a warning to stay on the sidelines.​

The core fundamental driver behind today’s selloff is the contrast between ProFrac’s modest sequential improvement and its weaker year‑over‑year performance. For 2025, total revenue fell to $1.94 billion from $2.19 billion in 2024, reflecting softer activity and pricing in North American unconventional oil and gas markets. Net loss widened significantly, to around $356 million from $208 million, as lower utilization, cost inflation, and pricing pressure eroded margins. Adjusted EBITDA declined to $310 million, or 16% of revenue, compared with $501 million and a 23% margin in 2024, underscoring how the company’s earnings power has reset lower in a tougher frac environment.

Fourth‑quarter numbers told a more nuanced story — one that was not strong enough to offset the broader concerns. Q4 revenue increased to $437 million from $403 million in Q3, while adjusted EBITDA improved to $61 million (14% margin) from $41 million (10% margin), and free cash flow turned positive at about $14 million after being negative in Q3. Segment detail showed Stimulation Services revenue rising to $384 million with better EBITDA, and Proppant Production revenue climbing to $115 million with improving margins, though the Manufacturing segment softened. These figures indicate that ProFrac is stabilizing operations and clawing back some profitability, but they still fall short of what many investors had hoped for given the company’s capital intensity and leverage.

Balance sheet and financing developments added another layer of pressure. Earlier this month, ProFrac amended its primary revolving credit facility via a Ninth Amendment, extending maturity to September 3, 2027 but cutting maximum availability to $275 million and tightening covenants, including replacing a $15 million minimum liquidity requirement with a $45 million minimum availability covenant. Pricing on SOFR loans was also increased through step‑ups over time. These changes signal that lenders were willing to extend term but only in exchange for more conservative structures and higher spreads, a combination that typically raises investor concerns about financial flexibility and cost of capital. Against the backdrop of widening net losses and margin compression, the amended facility reinforced the perception that ProFrac remains in a stressed, rather than comfortably funded, position.

Market context and expectations coming into the print also help explain the sharp reaction. Ahead of earnings, technical analysis highlighted a bullish pennant in ACDC, forming after a roughly 38% three‑month rally, with support flagged near $4.84 and a pattern win rate above 75% historically. However, the same analysis pointed out that the company had missed expectations in earlier quarters, was valued at a steep premium to some intrinsic estimates — one model put fair value near $1.16 — and carried a consensus analyst rating effectively equivalent to “Reduce,” with underweight calls and low single‑digit price targets from major brokers. When those kinds of cautious fundamentals collide with a technically extended setup, even modest disappointment or a lack of clear positive surprise can trigger a swift downside break, as appears to have happened today.

Looking ahead, investors in ProFrac will be weighing whether today’s 11% decline marks a new buying opportunity or a sign of deeper structural issues. On the one hand, Q4’s sequential improvements in revenue, adjusted EBITDA, and free cash flow, plus better performance in key segments, suggest the company is at least moving in the right direction operationally. On the other, the full‑year numbers — lower revenue, a larger net loss, compressed margins and a tightened, more expensive credit facility — highlight a business still wrestling with cyclical headwinds and high financial leverage. Much will depend on how 2026 unfolds: if industry conditions stabilize, ProFrac continues to improve utilization and pricing, and management maintains discipline on capex and costs, the current valuation reset could eventually be seen as excessive. If the frac market weakens further or execution slips, however, investors may decide that even after today’s selloff, the risk remains skewed to the downside.

Tickeron AI Perspective

 Disclaimers and Limitations

Related Ticker: ACDC

Contributor

Alicia's AvatarAlicia|Beginner

ACDC sees its 50-day moving average cross bearishly below its 200-day moving average

The 50-day moving average for ACDC moved below the 200-day moving average on August 14, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In of 57 cases where ACDC's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

ACDC moved below its 50-day moving average on August 17, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where ACDC declined for three days, the price rose further in of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

ACDC broke above its upper Bollinger Band on August 11, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

The Aroon Indicator for ACDC entered a downward trend on August 10, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where ACDC's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, of 25 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are .

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on August 21, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on ACDC as a result. In of 76 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for ACDC just turned positive on August 04, 2026. Looking at past instances where ACDC's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in of 39 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

Following a 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where ACDC advanced for three days, in of 245 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.622) is normal, around the industry mean (3.628). P/E Ratio (0.000) is within average values for comparable stocks, (81.681). ACDC's Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is slightly lower than the industry average of (1.655). ACDC has a moderately low Dividend Yield (0.000) as compared to the industry average of (0.018). P/S Ratio (0.484) is also within normal values, averaging (2.245).

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. ACDC’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. ACDC’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 65, placing this stock worse than average.

Notable companies

The most notable companies in this group are SLB Limited (NYSE:SLB), Halliburton Company (NYSE:HAL).

Industry description

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the Oilfield Services/Equipment Industry is 6.32B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 43.89 to 79.95B. SLB holds the highest valuation in this group at 79.95B. The lowest valued company is KEGX at 43.89.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the Oilfield Services/Equipment Industry was -5%. For the same Industry, the average monthly price growth was -1%, and the average quarterly price growth was 47%. LB experienced the highest price growth at 14%, while RCON experienced the biggest fall at -100%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the Oilfield Services/Equipment Industry was 1%. For the same stocks of the Industry, the average monthly volume growth was -21% and the average quarterly volume growth was -38%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating: 55
P/E Growth Rating: 30
Price Growth Rating: 51
SMR Rating: 74
Profit Risk Rating: 65
Seasonality Score: -2 (-100 ... +100)
View a ticker or compare two or three
ACDC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
Last 5 trading days
A.I. Advisor
published General Information

General Information

Industry OilfieldServicesEquipment

Profile
Details
Industry
N/A
Address
333 Shops Boulevard
Phone
+1 254 776-3722
Employees
2280
Web
https://www.profrac.com
Interact to see
Advertisement
ERII shares have remained resilient, trading near $15.47 ahead of Q4 and full-year 2025 earnings scheduled for February 25, 2026. Q3 2025 results exceeded expectations, with revenue of $32 million and EPS of $0.07, despite year-over-year declines tied to project timing.
Liberty Broadband Corporation (LBRDA) has experienced pronounced swings in recent weeks, touching multiyear lows before staging a sharp recovery. The stock continues to trade within a wide 52-week range, closely tied to the value of its Charter Communications stake and investor expectations around the proposed merger.
Arm Holdings (ARM) shares have demonstrated resilience in recent sessions, rebounding after an initial earnings-related pullback and stabilizing near technical support levels. While smartphone-related headwinds tied to memory shortages pressured sentiment, momentum in AI-driven data center royalties helped restore confidence.
Shell plc (SHEL) reported Q4 2025 adjusted earnings of $3.3 billion, below expectations due to weaker oil prices and non-cash tax charges. Full-year adjusted earnings reached $18.5 billion, supported by strong LNG and upstream operations. A 4% dividend increase to $0.372 per share and a new $3.5 billion buyback program reinforce capital return commitments.
Linde (LIN) reported Q4 2025 adjusted EPS of $4.20, topping estimates, with full-year revenue reaching $34 billion. 2026 EPS guidance of $17.40–$17.90 implies 6–9% growth, supported by a record $10 billion project backlog.
ConocoPhillips (COP) reported Q4 2025 adjusted EPS of $1.02, missing estimates due to weaker oil prices. Full-year adjusted earnings totaled $7.7 billion, with $19.9 billion in operating cash flow. Shares have gained more than 10% in recent weeks, supported by analyst upgrades and sector momentum.
Verisk Analytics (VRSK) delivered Q4 2025 revenue of $779 million, up 5.9% year over year, with adjusted EPS of $1.82, beating expectations. Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) reported Q3 FY2026 revenue of $2.62 billion, down 10.2% year over year, but adjusted diluted EPS climbed 14% to $1.77, well above estimates.
(OMC) Omnicom’s fourth-quarter report, released February 18, 2026, marked its first earnings update incorporating results from Interpublic Group (IPG), acquired on November 26, 2025. The combination created the world’s largest marketing services firm by revenue, a significant milestone as the advertising industry consolidates and adapts to digital transformation.
Copart (CPRT) is set to report fiscal Q2 2026 earnings on February 19, 2026, after market close. Consensus calls for EPS of $0.39–$0.40 and revenue of $1.15–$1.18 billion. Global Payments (GPN) posted Q4 2025 adjusted EPS of $3.18, in line with expectations, and adjusted net revenue of $2.32 billion, up 6% in constant currency (excluding dispositions). Thomson Reuters (TRI) delivered Q4 2025 adjusted EPS of $1.07 and revenue of $2.01 billion, up 5% year over year, supported by recurring subscription growth.
Unilever PLC (UL) leads year-to-date performance with a 12.61% gain, ahead of Diageo plc (DEO) at 9.90% and Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. (KDP) at 4.27%. DEO offers the highest dividend yield at 4.35%, compared with KDP (3.16%) and UL (2.97%). All three stocks carry low betas—DEO (0.18), UL (0.24), and KDP (0.35)—highlighting their defensive characteristics.
Q1 Fiscal 2026 Results: Revenue of $333M and adjusted EBITDA of $50M (15% margin), exceeding analyst expectations. FY2026 Guidance Raised: Adjusted EBITDA now projected at $225M, with revenue reaffirmed near $1.5B. EV Backlog Growth: 855 electric buses worth $277M, highlighting robust demand supported by EPA clean bus funding.
IBM fell over 10% today mainly because a new AI tool from Anthropic is seen as a direct threat to IBM’s lucrative COBOL modernization and consulting business, triggering worries that key legacy‑modernization revenue will be automated away.
Today’s drop is mainly about competitive positioning and future growth expectations, not an immediate collapse of current Wegovy/Ozempic sales, but it signals that Novo may not have the strongest next‑wave obesity drug versus Eli Lilly, which is why the stock sold off so sharply.
RNG (RingCentral) dropped over 12% today mainly as a sharp pullback after a very steep recent run‑up driven by upbeat Q4 results, guidance, and capital‑return news, with profit‑taking amplified by valuation concerns and a weak broader tech tap
Fundamentally, the latest public guidance is still for rapid growth and profitability, but today’s drop reflects a reset of sentiment and valuation rather than a brand‑new deterioration in those targets. For investors, the key question is whether the current price appropriately reflects execution risk, competition in diagnostics, and macro volatility after the guidance‑driven rally and subsequent reversal.
TNC (Tennant Company) is down more than 25% today because it reported a very large earnings and revenue miss for Q4 2025, blamed on serious ERP rollout problems and weaker demand, and guided to a slower‑than‑hoped recovery in 2026.
XMTR (Xometry) is down more than 21% today because, despite reporting record growth and an earnings beat, the company announced a CEO transition and investors used the news to take profits after a big prior run‑up, with heavy short interest amplifying the drop.
EDSA (Edesa Biotech) is up more than 21% today largely on speculative trading in a very illiquid penny stock with no clear, company‑specific news catalyst, likely driven by technical factors, retail flows, and short‑term trading rather than fundamentals.
Q4 2025 revenue came in strong at about 214–215 million, up mid‑30s percent year over year and a few percent above estimates, but GAAP EPS was only 0.08 versus expectations around 0.31, a roughly 70–75% miss and down from 0.13 a year earlier.
Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (EL) has rebounded with ~12% YTD gains and 50%+ one-year returns, supported by margin improvements and strong skincare/fragrance demand despite broader prestige beauty challenges.