Go to the list of all blogs
Sergey Savastiouk's Avatar
published in Blogs
Sep 03, 2026
Why Is ChargePoint Holdings (CHPT) Stock Up +41.81% Today?

Why Is ChargePoint Holdings (CHPT) Stock Up +41.81% Today?

Key Takeaways

  • CHPT shares surged as much as 41.81% in Thursday's session, trading near $7.36 versus a prior close of $5.19.
  • The rally was driven by a strong fiscal second-quarter earnings report that beat revenue and loss expectations.
  • Non-GAAP gross margin hit a record 38%, while the adjusted EBITDA loss narrowed sharply year over year.
  • Management issued third-quarter revenue guidance of $105 million to $115 million, roughly in line with consensus.
  • Elevated short interest and a heavily beaten-down valuation amplified the upside momentum.
  • Traders are now watching whether the gains hold and how analysts revise their outlooks for the company's path to profitability.

Opening Summary

ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT), a provider of networked electric-vehicle charging infrastructure and cloud-based software across North America and Europe, staged one of the day's sharpest rallies after reporting better-than-expected fiscal second-quarter results. Shares climbed roughly 41.81%, reaching about $7.36 after closing the previous session at $5.19. The stock moved decisively upward, with markets attributing the surge to an earnings-driven beat that showcased record gross margins, narrower losses, and continued progress toward operating profitability.

Earnings Results and Guidance

The primary catalyst was ChargePoint's fiscal second-quarter 2027 earnings report, released after the bell on September 2. Revenue rose 17.8% year over year to $116.1 million, comfortably exceeding analyst consensus of approximately $105 million. Networked charging systems revenue climbed 25% to roughly $62.9 million, while higher-margin subscription revenue grew 10% to about $43.7 million. The company posted an adjusted loss of $1.35 per share, better than the consensus estimate for a loss of $1.60 per share.

Guidance reinforced the bullish tone. Management forecast fiscal third-quarter revenue of $105 million to $115 million, with the midpoint slightly above consensus expectations. The combination of a top-line beat and constructive forward guidance gave investors confidence that a multi-quarter restructuring effort is translating into tangible operating improvement.

Margin Expansion and a Narrowing Path to Breakeven

Investors focused heavily on profitability metrics, where progress was most pronounced. Non-GAAP gross margin reached a record 38%, up 500 basis points from 33% a year earlier and 600 basis points sequentially. The quarter benefited from a one-time tariff refund of roughly $4.2 million; excluding that benefit, normalized gross margin was approximately 35%, still a meaningful improvement driven by better hardware economics, lower freight and warehousing costs, and a richer product mix.

Discipline on the cost side compounded the gains. Non-GAAP operating expenses fell 4% sequentially and 11% year over year to about $52 million, aided by a cost-optimization program completed in late July. As a result, the adjusted EBITDA loss narrowed to roughly $5 million from $22 million a year earlier, and the adjusted net loss shrank by 72%. Chief Executive Officer Rick Wilmer characterized the quarter as exceptional, citing record gross margin and rigorous cash management, with the company holding about $95.7 million in cash at quarter-end.

Short Squeeze and Technical Momentum

The magnitude of the move was likely amplified by the stock's heavily shorted, beaten-down profile. With short interest near 22% of the float and shares trading at a fraction of their 52-week high of $12.61, a positive fundamental catalyst forced short sellers to cover positions, adding fuel to the price rally. The stock also reclaimed levels well above its recent trading range, reinforcing the sense of a technical breakout even as broader sentiment remained subdued.

Market Context and Trading Activity

The surge was company-specific rather than a reflection of broader market strength. Major U.S. indexes were little changed, with the S&P 500 broadly flat and the Nasdaq slightly lower, indicating that CHPT diverged sharply from the tape. Trading volume ran well above its typical daily average, underscoring conviction behind the move. While peers such as BLNK and EVGO operate in the same EV charging space, the day's action was largely isolated to ChargePoint's own results rather than a broad sector rally.

What Comes Next for CHPT

The next test for CHPT is whether the operational gains that drove this quarter's beat prove durable. Investors will watch for analyst estimate revisions and management commentary on sustaining normalized margins near 35%, keeping operating expenses below $50 million per quarter, and progressing toward adjusted EBITDA breakeven. Key risks remain, including lingering unprofitability, negative cash flow, competitive pressure in EV charging, and a still-uncertain macroeconomic backdrop for electric-vehicle adoption. The company's forward execution will determine whether this earnings-driven move marks a genuine inflection or a shorter-lived relief rally.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron offers hundreds of AI-powered trading bots covering thousands of tickers, but only the strongest performers under current market conditions are featured in its curated Trending AI Robots section. These bots vary by strategy, timeframe, performance metrics, and the symbols they trade, giving traders a range of automated approaches to consider. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to see which strategies are currently leading the market.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Related Ticker: CHPT

Contributor

Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.


CHPT in upward trend: price expected to rise as it breaks its lower Bollinger Band on September 01, 2026

CHPT may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In of 44 cases where CHPT's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 2 days, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.

Following a 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CHPT advanced for three days, in of 237 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In of 109 cases where CHPT Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are .

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on August 24, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on CHPT as a result. In of 75 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for CHPT turned negative on August 27, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 51 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In of the 51 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at .

CHPT moved below its 50-day moving average on August 24, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CHPT declined for three days, the price rose further in of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. CHPT’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (9.930) is normal, around the industry mean (4.843). P/E Ratio (0.000) is within average values for comparable stocks, (37.364). CHPT's Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is slightly lower than the industry average of (1.391). CHPT has a moderately low Dividend Yield (0.000) as compared to the industry average of (0.032). P/S Ratio (0.295) is also within normal values, averaging (1.084).

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. CHPT’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 89, placing this stock worse than average.

Notable companies

The most notable companies in this group are Ulta Beauty (NASDAQ:ULTA), Best Buy Company (NYSE:BBY), Tractor Supply Co (NASDAQ:TSCO), Five Below (NASDAQ:FIVE), GameStop Corp (NYSE:GME), Bath & Body Works (NYSE:BBWI), RH (NYSE:RH), 1-800-FLOWERS.COM (NASDAQ:FLWS).

Industry description

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the Specialty Stores Industry is 4.28B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 4.65K to 52.32B. ANCTF holds the highest valuation in this group at 52.32B. The lowest valued company is SIMPQ at 4.65K.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the Specialty Stores Industry was -2%. For the same Industry, the average monthly price growth was -5%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3%. ABLV experienced the highest price growth at 22%, while BBW experienced the biggest fall at -23%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the Specialty Stores Industry was -25%. For the same stocks of the Industry, the average monthly volume growth was -40% and the average quarterly volume growth was 20%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating: 48
P/E Growth Rating: 60
Price Growth Rating: 61
SMR Rating: 64
Profit Risk Rating: 89
Seasonality Score: -28 (-100 ... +100)
View a ticker or compare two or three
CHPT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
Last 5 trading days
A.I. Advisor
published General Information

General Information

a blank check company, which formed for the purpose of effecting a merger, stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, recapitalization, and reorganization

Industry SpecialtyStores

Profile
Details
Industry
N/A
Address
240 East Hacienda Avenue
Phone
+1 408 841-4500
Employees
1650
Web
https://investors.chargepoint.com
Interact to see
Advertisement
Stifel Financial (SF) appears to be down over 30% on your screen today primarily because its shares began trading split‑adjusted following a three‑for‑two stock split (a 50% stock dividend), not because of a sudden collapse in the company’s fundamentals. After the split, the per‑share price is mechanically lower, even though the underlying value of the business has not changed.
Sunrun (RUN) sank more than 35–37% today even after posting a massive Q4 beat because its outlook and strategic commentary signaled slower volume growth, tighter financing conditions, and a more defensive stance on 2026, which together triggered a sharp reset in already‑volatile solar sentiment.
PAR Technology Corp. (PAR) dropped more than 28% today after its latest earnings report, even though it beat on revenue and EPS, because investors focused on weak profitability, continued operating losses, and a wave of sharply lower analyst price targets that signaled reduced confidence in the stock’s near‑term upside.
Carter’s (CRI) dropped more than 21% today because, even though it beat Q4 expectations on both sales and earnings, management issued a much weaker 2026 earnings outlook, highlighted ongoing margin pressure from tariffs and product costs, and guided to a sharp near‑term EPS drop that jarred investors.
WES is an oil & gas midstream partnership (NYSE: WES) with largely fee‑based, long‑term volume contracts in key basins such as the Delaware and DJ, which insulate cash flows from direct oil price swings but still tie them to producer activity and throughput. Current positioning: The units trade around 41–42 dollars with a high cash yield (roughly 9% dividend), solid profitability (P/E about 14), and strong returns on equity above 40%, signaling a mature, cash‑generative infrastructure asset.
SD is a pure‑play upstream energy company with operations concentrated in U.S. onshore oil and gas, so its revenues are directly influenced by global oil and gas price movements.
TTI is an oilfield services and specialty chemicals company, not a direct oil producer, so it tends to benefit when higher oil prices lead to sustained drilling and completion activity rather than from price moves alone. The Iran war raises the odds of major supply disruptions, and several commentators see a path to Brent near 100 dollars per barrel if the Strait of Hormuz is impaired, which would support energy capex and, by extension, demand for TTI’s services and fluids.
COP is a global upstream heavyweight, producing more than 2.3 million barrels of oil equivalent per day and generating over 60 billion dollars in annual revenue, with a strategy centered on disciplined capex and robust cash returns to shareholders. The Iran war introduces a structural risk premium into oil markets; if supply from the region or traffic through Hormuz is disrupted, analysts see Brent potentially trading nearer 90–100 dollars per barrel or higher, which is supportive for ConocoPhillips’ cash flows and valuation.
ONEOK is a diversified midstream operator focused on gathering, processing, fractionation, transportation, storage, and marine export of natural gas, NGLs, refined products, and crude, with most revenue coming from relatively stable fee‑based contracts. The US–Iran war increases the odds of supply disruptions or perceived risks in the Gulf, which has already contributed to higher oil and LNG prices and a persistent geopolitical risk premium.
Exxon Mobil is a global energy giant with roughly 324 billion dollars in trailing revenue, around 29 billion dollars in earnings, record production near 4.7 million barrels per day, and a long runway of projects in Guyana, the Permian, LNG and carbon capture. The Iran war has disrupted shipping through the Strait of Hormuz and could keep a 10–20 dollar‑per‑barrel risk premium in crude if tensions stay high, which would generally be positive for XOM’s upstream earnings and refining margins.
Chevron is a global integrated oil and gas major with growing production, a strong balance sheet, and significant exposure to long‑life projects in the Permian, LNG, and Venezuela, aiming for structurally higher cash flows through 2026 and beyond. The Iran war has increased the probability of supply disruptions or perceived risk in the Gulf, and several analysts warn that Brent could move above 100 dollars per barrel if Hormuz traffic is impaired, which would generally be supportive for Chevron’s earnings and free cash flow.
Shell is a diversified global major with roughly 266.9 billion dollars in trailing revenue, 17.8 billion dollars in earnings, a 3.5% dividend yield, and an active buyback program, trading at about 13 times earnings near its 52‑week high. The Iran war materially raises the risk of disruptions or perceived threats around the Strait of Hormuz, which could push oil well above 80–100 dollars per barrel and tighten LNG markets, a setup that is generally supportive for Shell’s upstream and LNG businesses.
LMT is a defense heavyweight with roughly 75 billion dollars in annual revenue, about 5 billion dollars in earnings, and a backlog above 190 billion dollars spanning fighters, missiles, space, and sustainment contracts that support long‑term cash flow. The U.S.–Iran war has triggered a classic “flight to defense,” with sector ETFs and names like Lockheed rallying as investors price in higher defense spending, missile restocking, and elevated geopolitical risk for years to come.
NOC is a defense heavyweight with about 42 billion dollars in annual revenue, 4.18 billion dollars in earnings, and key growth programs in the B‑21 bomber, Sentinel ICBM, missile defense, and space, which are all strategically prioritized in U.S. and allied budgets. The Iran war has reinforced a rotation into defense stocks as investors expect elevated military spending, ammunition and missile restocking, and sustained demand for advanced systems, and commentary specifically cites Northrop as a likely beneficiary.
RTX is a broad aerospace and defense leader with about 88.6 billion dollars in 2025 revenue, 6.73 billion dollars in earnings, and a 268 billion dollar backlog spanning commercial and defense programs that support multi‑year growth. Management guides to 92–93 billion dollars in 2026 sales, adjusted EPS of 6.60–6.80, and free cash flow of 8.25–8.75 billion dollars, with analysts expecting roughly 6% EPS growth to around 6.67 dollars in 2026.
Delta is the most profitable major U.S. airline, with 2025 operating revenue of 58.3 billion dollars, adjusted EPS of 5.82 dollars, 12% ROIC, and manageable leverage, and it is guiding to 2026 EPS of 6.50–7.50 dollars and 3–4 billion dollars of free cash flow. The Iran war is pushing oil and jet fuel prices higher, with jet fuel benchmarks up about 22% this year amid fears over flows through the Strait of Hormuz, and long‑haul routes across the region are being rerouted, raising costs and causing disruptions.
GD produces business jets, combat vehicles, IT and mission systems, and submarines, with 2025 revenue of 52.55 billion dollars, net income of 4.21 billion dollars, EPS of 15.45, and a sizable backlog near 118 billion dollars that underpins future growth.​ The Iran war has boosted interest in defense stocks; sector ETFs are up double digits this year and analysts emphasize that long‑duration maintenance and modernization contracts can support cash flows even after the conflict cools.
HII is the dominant U.S. Navy shipbuilder, focused on aircraft carriers, submarines, and other major naval vessels, with about 12.0 billion dollars in trailing revenue, 569 million dollars in net income, and EPS of 14.50. The Iran war and threats around the Strait of Hormuz highlight the importance of naval and missile-defense capabilities; reports show interceptor stocks being depleted and stress that keeping sea lanes open will likely require sustained naval investment where HII is a key contractor.
United is a large global carrier with a premium‑focused “United Next” strategy that upgauges to larger, more fuel‑efficient aircraft and adds premium seats to improve margins over the next several years. The Iran war has forced widespread Middle East airspace closures, creating thousands of cancellations, diversions, longer flight times, and higher fuel burn; analysts warn of higher fares and air‑freight rates if the conflict persists.
GE Aerospace is a focused aviation and defense company with two major segments—commercial engines and services, and defense and propulsion—earning most of its profits from long‑duration engine service on an installed base near 80,000 engines. Revenue and earnings growth have been strong, with recent quarterly revenue above 11 billion dollars, up high‑teens year over year, and net income over 2 billion dollars; management guides to 2026 EPS of 7.10–7.40 dollars, well above this year’s roughly 5.4‑dollar consensus.