It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ABEV’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTAP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ABEV’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TAP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
ABEV (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) experienced а +4.42% price change this week, while TAP (@Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) price change was -4.46% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy industry was -0.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.34%.
ABEV is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
TAP is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
The meat, fish, and dairy food industry processes livestock, fish and milk products for consumer consumption. Some companies also process dairy byproducts. Tyson Foods, Inc., Hormel Foods Corporation and Pilgrims Pride Corp. are some of the biggest producers in this industry. Many of these companies are recipients of American farm subsidies. On the other hand, new-age food innovation like plant-based meat substitutes (which are designed to simulate chicken, beef, and pork sausage) could potentially augur disruptions and/or create new competition in this space.
ABEV | TAP | ABEV / TAP | |
Capitalization | 37.3B | 9.4B | 397% |
EBITDA | 29.4B | 2.44B | 1,207% |
Gain YTD | 32.513 | -16.081 | -202% |
P/E Ratio | 13.41 | 9.24 | 145% |
Revenue | 91.7B | 11.3B | 812% |
Total Cash | 17.5B | 614M | 2,850% |
Total Debt | 3.16B | 6.32B | 50% |
ABEV | TAP | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 25 | 52 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | 32 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 55 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 53 | 78 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 60 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ABEV's Valuation (4) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as TAP (32). This means that ABEV’s stock grew similarly to TAP’s over the last 12 months.
TAP's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as ABEV (63). This means that TAP’s stock grew similarly to ABEV’s over the last 12 months.
ABEV's SMR Rating (53) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as TAP (78). This means that ABEV’s stock grew similarly to TAP’s over the last 12 months.
ABEV's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as TAP (63). This means that ABEV’s stock grew similarly to TAP’s over the last 12 months.
ABEV's P/E Growth Rating (56) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as TAP (60). This means that ABEV’s stock grew similarly to TAP’s over the last 12 months.
ABEV | TAP | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago37% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago59% | 1 day ago64% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago66% | 1 day ago61% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago53% | 1 day ago60% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago63% | 1 day ago58% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago65% | 1 day ago57% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago64% | 14 days ago68% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago63% | 1 day ago59% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago57% | 1 day ago68% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago63% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
JANJ | 24.99 | N/A | N/A |
Innovator Premium Income 30 Bar ETF -Jan | |||
NBTR | 51.43 | N/A | N/A |
Neuberger Berman Total Return Bond ETF | |||
CGBL | 34.77 | -0.11 | -0.32% |
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF | |||
WEAT | 4.25 | -0.04 | -0.93% |
Teucrium Wheat Fund | |||
XFLT | 5.39 | -0.10 | -1.82% |
XAI Octagon Floating Rate and Alternative Income Trust |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ABEV has been loosely correlated with BUD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ABEV jumps, then BUD could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ABEV | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ABEV | 100% | N/A | ||
BUD - ABEV | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.54% | ||
FMX - ABEV | 44% Loosely correlated | +1.87% | ||
CCU - ABEV | 37% Loosely correlated | -2.45% | ||
DEO - ABEV | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.02% | ||
STZ - ABEV | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.22% | ||
More |