Ad is loading...
ACA
Price
$110.65
Change
+$2.31 (+2.13%)
Updated
Nov 22, 03:11 PM (EDT)
89 days until earnings call
PWR
Price
$340.71
Change
+$0.70 (+0.21%)
Updated
Nov 22, 03:33 PM (EDT)
90 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ACA vs PWR

Header iconACA vs PWR Comparison
Open Charts ACA vs PWRBanner chart's image
Arcosa
Price$110.65
Change+$2.31 (+2.13%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Quanta Services
Price$340.71
Change+$0.70 (+0.21%)
Volume$500
CapitalizationN/A
ACA vs PWR Comparison Chart
Loading...
ACA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
PWR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACA vs. PWR commentary
Nov 22, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACA is a Buy and PWR is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 22, 2024
Stock price -- (ACA: $108.34 vs. PWR: $340.01)
Brand notoriety: ACA and PWR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACA: 145% vs. PWR: 126%
Market capitalization -- ACA: $5.16B vs. PWR: $50.19B
ACA [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $5.16B. PWR’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $50.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $5.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePWR’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • ACA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PWR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PWR is a better buy in the long-term than ACA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PWR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PWR is a better buy in the short-term than ACA.

Price Growth

ACA (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +4.50% price change this week, while PWR (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +4.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +3.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

ACA is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.

PWR is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+3.98% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PWR($50.2B) has a higher market cap than ACA($5.16B). PWR has higher P/E ratio than ACA: PWR (62.85) vs ACA (40.24). PWR YTD gains are higher at: 57.715 vs. ACA (31.406). PWR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.97B vs. ACA (374M). PWR (764M) and ACA (757M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . ACA has less debt than PWR: ACA (1.24B) vs PWR (5.01B). PWR has higher revenues than ACA: PWR (22.9B) vs ACA (2.49B).
ACAPWRACA / PWR
Capitalization5.16B50.2B10%
EBITDA374M1.97B19%
Gain YTD31.40657.71554%
P/E Ratio40.2462.8564%
Revenue2.49B22.9B11%
Total Cash757M764M99%
Total Debt1.24B5.01B25%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACA vs PWR: Fundamental Ratings
ACA
PWR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2476
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
72
SMR RATING
1..100
8261
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4011
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
521
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ACA's Valuation (83) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as PWR (91) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that ACA’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as ACA (7) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry. This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to ACA’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's SMR Rating (61) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as ACA (82) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry. This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to ACA’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's Price Growth Rating (11) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as ACA (40) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry. This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to ACA’s over the last 12 months.

ACA's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as PWR (21) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that ACA’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACAPWR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ACA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
PWR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LRGF61.660.60
+0.98%
iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF
FCEF22.110.11
+0.52%
First Trust Income Opportunity ETF
SVXY50.270.23
+0.46%
ProShares Short VIX Short-Term Futures
BLKC27.520.02
+0.07%
Invesco Aln Glxy Blkh Usr&Dctrzd Cmr ETF
GTIP48.74-0.07
-0.14%
Goldman Sachs Acs Infl Protd USD Bd ETF

ACA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACA has been loosely correlated with ALG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACA jumps, then ALG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACA
1D Price
Change %
ACA100%
+2.37%
ALG - ACA
62%
Loosely correlated
+2.41%
PRIM - ACA
60%
Loosely correlated
+3.53%
ACM - ACA
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.82%
MTZ - ACA
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.88%
PWR - ACA
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.31%
More

PWR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWR has been closely correlated with PRIM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWR jumps, then PRIM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PWR
1D Price
Change %
PWR100%
+2.31%
PRIM - PWR
67%
Closely correlated
+3.53%
EME - PWR
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.16%
MTZ - PWR
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.88%
ACA - PWR
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.37%
APG - PWR
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.78%
More