AFL
Price
$76.46
Change
-$0.29 (-0.38%)
Updated
Oct 2, 6:59 PM EST
30 days until earnings call
BHF
Price
$47.97
Change
-$0.97 (-1.98%)
Updated
Oct 2, 6:59 PM EST
35 days until earnings call

Compare trend and price AFL vs BHF

Header iconAFL vs BHF Comparison
Open Charts AFL vs BHFBanner chart's image
Aflac
Price$76.46
Change-$0.29 (-0.38%)
Volume$579.27K
CapitalizationN/A
Brighthouse Financial
Price$47.97
Change-$0.97 (-1.98%)
Volume$359.03K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
AFL vs BHF Comparison Chart

Loading...

Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
VS
AFL vs. BHF commentary
Oct 03, 2023

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFL is a Hold and BHF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 03, 2023
Stock price -- (AFL: $76.75 vs. BHF: $48.94)
Brand notoriety: AFL and BHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFL: 129% vs. BHF: 80%
Market capitalization -- AFL: $45.59B vs. BHF: $3.21B
AFL [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $45.59B. BHF’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $3.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $133.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $20.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AFL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • BHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AFL is a better buy in the long-term than BHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BHF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • BHF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BHF is a better buy in the short-term than AFL.

Price Growth

AFL (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а +0.58% price change this week, while BHF (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was +3.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was -1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFL is expected to report earnings on Nov 01, 2023.

BHF is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (-1.07% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for AFL with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for BHF with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFL($46.1B) has a higher market cap than BHF($3.21B). AFL has higher P/E ratio than BHF: AFL (10.42) vs BHF (4.80). AFL YTD gains are higher at: 8.620 vs. BHF (-4.545). BHF (82.4B) and AFL (79.2B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . BHF has less debt than AFL: BHF (3.16B) vs AFL (7.09B). AFL has higher revenues than BHF: AFL (19B) vs BHF (4.17B).
AFLBHFAFL / BHF
Capitalization46.1B3.21B1,437%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD8.620-4.545-190%
P/E Ratio10.424.80217%
Revenue19B4.17B456%
Total Cash79.2B82.4B96%
Total Debt7.09B3.16B225%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AFL vs BHF: Fundamental Ratings
AFL
BHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1673
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1763
SMR RATING
1..100
9598
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2147
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3732
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AFL's Valuation (58) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as BHF (70). This means that AFL’s stock grew similarly to BHF’s over the last 12 months.

AFL's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BHF (63). This means that AFL’s stock grew somewhat faster than BHF’s over the last 12 months.

AFL's SMR Rating (95) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as BHF (98). This means that AFL’s stock grew similarly to BHF’s over the last 12 months.

AFL's Price Growth Rating (21) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as BHF (47). This means that AFL’s stock grew similarly to BHF’s over the last 12 months.

BHF's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as AFL (37). This means that BHF’s stock grew similarly to AFL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFLBHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OND21.550.23
+1.08%
ProShares On-Demand ETF
ARDC12.900.12
+0.94%
Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund
SQLV35.98-0.14
-0.38%
Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF
SHDG23.10-0.11
-0.46%
Soundwatch Hedged Equity ETF
NULV33.59-0.22
-0.65%
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF

AFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFL has been closely correlated with PRU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AFL jumps, then PRU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFL
1D Price
Change %
AFL100%
-1.18%
PRU - AFL
76%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
MET - AFL
73%
Closely correlated
+0.02%
GL - AFL
72%
Closely correlated
-1.46%
CNO - AFL
70%
Closely correlated
-1.17%
BHF - AFL
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
More

BHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BHF has been closely correlated with PRU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BHF jumps, then PRU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BHF
1D Price
Change %
BHF100%
-0.08%
PRU - BHF
85%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
MET - BHF
77%
Closely correlated
+0.02%
PRI - BHF
76%
Closely correlated
-1.38%
CNO - BHF
76%
Closely correlated
-1.17%
MFC - BHF
69%
Closely correlated
-1.03%
More