AFL
Price
$101.57
Change
-$0.71 (-0.69%)
Updated
Jul 11 closing price
Capitalization
49.4B
24 days until earnings call
BHF
Price
$48.79
Change
-$3.34 (-6.41%)
Updated
Jul 11 closing price
Capitalization
3.21B
26 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFL vs BHF

Header iconAFL vs BHF Comparison
Open Charts AFL vs BHFBanner chart's image
Aflac
Price$101.57
Change-$0.71 (-0.69%)
Volume$1.35M
Capitalization49.4B
Brighthouse Financial
Price$48.79
Change-$3.34 (-6.41%)
Volume$1.6M
Capitalization3.21B
AFL vs BHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFL vs. BHF commentary
Jul 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFL is a Hold and BHF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 12, 2025
Stock price -- (AFL: $101.57 vs. BHF: $48.79)
Brand notoriety: AFL and BHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFL: 60% vs. BHF: 199%
Market capitalization -- AFL: $49.4B vs. BHF: $3.21B
AFL [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $49.4B. BHF’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $3.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $133.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $24.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBHF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AFL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • BHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AFL is a better buy in the long-term than BHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BHF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • BHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AFL is a better buy in the short-term than BHF.

Price Growth

AFL (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -2.87% price change this week, while BHF (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -9.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +1.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFL is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

BHF is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+1.15% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFL($49.4B) has a higher market cap than BHF($3.21B). AFL has higher P/E ratio than BHF: AFL (10.95) vs BHF (4.80). BHF YTD gains are higher at: 1.561 vs. AFL (-0.713). BHF has more cash in the bank: 86B vs. AFL (77.6B). BHF has less debt than AFL: BHF (3.16B) vs AFL (7.36B). AFL has higher revenues than BHF: AFL (18.8B) vs BHF (3.95B).
AFLBHFAFL / BHF
Capitalization49.4B3.21B1,541%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.7131.561-46%
P/E Ratio10.954.80228%
Revenue18.8B3.95B476%
Total Cash77.6B86B90%
Total Debt7.36B3.16B233%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AFL vs BHF: Fundamental Ratings
AFL
BHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
226
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
351
SMR RATING
1..100
9594
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5756
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1594
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BHF's Valuation (63) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as AFL (68). This means that BHF’s stock grew similarly to AFL’s over the last 12 months.

AFL's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BHF (51). This means that AFL’s stock grew somewhat faster than BHF’s over the last 12 months.

BHF's SMR Rating (94) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as AFL (95). This means that BHF’s stock grew similarly to AFL’s over the last 12 months.

BHF's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as AFL (57). This means that BHF’s stock grew similarly to AFL’s over the last 12 months.

AFL's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for BHF (94). This means that AFL’s stock grew significantly faster than BHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFLBHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
59%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DJIA21.710.07
+0.32%
Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF
MYCF25.050.01
+0.04%
SPDR SSGA My2026 Corporate Bond ETF
JMST50.89N/A
+0.01%
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Inc ETF
GXUS51.25N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta(R) Ttl IntEqETF
FRNW16.51-0.22
-1.31%
Fidelity Clean Energy ETF

AFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFL has been closely correlated with GL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AFL jumps, then GL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFL
1D Price
Change %
AFL100%
-0.69%
GL - AFL
69%
Closely correlated
-0.84%
PRI - AFL
68%
Closely correlated
-1.54%
MET - AFL
66%
Closely correlated
-0.85%
PRU - AFL
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.13%
CNO - AFL
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.65%
More

BHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BHF has been closely correlated with PRU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BHF jumps, then PRU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BHF
1D Price
Change %
BHF100%
-6.41%
PRU - BHF
75%
Closely correlated
-1.13%
CNO - BHF
73%
Closely correlated
-1.65%
MET - BHF
73%
Closely correlated
-0.85%
LNC - BHF
72%
Closely correlated
-0.53%
UNM - BHF
68%
Closely correlated
-0.53%
More