AFL
Price
$114.47
Change
-$0.27 (-0.24%)
Updated
Sep 10 closing price
Capitalization
57.39B
54 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GL
Price
$170.80
Change
+$0.98 (+0.58%)
Updated
Sep 10 closing price
Capitalization
13.13B
47 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFL vs GL

AFL vs GL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFL vs. GL commentary
Sep 11, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFL is a StrongBuy and GL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 11, 2026
Stock price -- (AFL: $114.47 vs. GL: $170.80)
Brand notoriety: AFL and GL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFL: 96% vs. GL: 55%
Market capitalization -- AFL: $57.39B vs. GL: $13.13B
AFL [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $57.39B. GL’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $13.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $228.36K to $154.94B. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $18.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while GL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AFL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GL is a better buy in the long-term than AFL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • GL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AFL and GL are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AFL (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -3.29% price change this week, while GL (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -3.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was -2.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFL is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

GL is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (-2.89% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFL($57.4B) has a higher market cap than GL($13.1B). AFL has higher P/E ratio than GL: AFL (12.35) vs GL (11.36). GL YTD gains are higher at: 22.874 vs. AFL (5.429). AFL has more cash in the bank: 71.8B vs. GL (790M). GL has less debt than AFL: GL (2.94B) vs AFL (8.73B). AFL has higher revenues than GL: AFL (18.3B) vs GL (6.18B).
AFLGLAFL / GL
Capitalization57.4B13.1B438%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD5.42922.87424%
P/E Ratio12.3511.36109%
Revenue18.3B6.18B296%
Total Cash71.8B790M9,089%
Total Debt8.73B2.94B297%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AFL vs GL: Fundamental Ratings
AFL
GL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6293
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
347
SMR RATING
1..100
9485
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5548
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9136
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AFL's Valuation (63) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as GL (70) in the null industry. This means that AFL’s stock grew similarly to GL’s over the last 12 months.

AFL's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GL (47) in the null industry. This means that AFL’s stock grew somewhat faster than GL’s over the last 12 months.

GL's SMR Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as AFL (94) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that GL’s stock grew similarly to AFL’s over the last 12 months.

GL's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as AFL (55) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that GL’s stock grew similarly to AFL’s over the last 12 months.

GL's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AFL (91) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that GL’s stock grew somewhat faster than AFL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFLGL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
27%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
AFL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BANR70.820.41
+0.58%
Banner Corp
EDVA0.24N/A
N/A
Endovia Health Sciences Inc
MKC51.10-0.38
-0.74%
McCormick & Company
KRUS41.13-0.94
-2.23%
Kura Sushi USA
IBIO1.23-0.04
-2.78%
iBio

AFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFL has been loosely correlated with CNO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AFL jumps, then CNO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFL
1D Price
Change %
AFL100%
-0.24%
CNO - AFL
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
PRI - AFL
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
GL - AFL
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
MET - AFL
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.14%
UNM - AFL
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.33%
More

GL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GL has been loosely correlated with CNO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GL jumps, then CNO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GL
1D Price
Change %
GL100%
+0.58%
CNO - GL
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
PRI - GL
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
PUK - GL
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.25%
AFL - GL
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
LNC - GL
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
More