AFL
Price
$109.54
Change
+$1.91 (+1.77%)
Updated
Sep 17, 04:24 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
57.98B
48 days until earnings call
MET
Price
$78.79
Change
+$0.06 (+0.08%)
Updated
Sep 17, 04:15 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
53.51B
42 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFL vs MET

Header iconAFL vs MET Comparison
Open Charts AFL vs METBanner chart's image
Aflac
Price$109.54
Change+$1.91 (+1.77%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization57.98B
MetLife
Price$78.79
Change+$0.06 (+0.08%)
Volume$1.52K
Capitalization53.51B
AFL vs MET Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFL vs. MET commentary
Sep 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFL is a StrongBuy and MET is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 17, 2025
Stock price -- (AFL: $107.63 vs. MET: $78.73)
Brand notoriety: AFL: Not notable vs. MET: Notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFL: 120% vs. MET: 156%
Market capitalization -- AFL: $57.98B vs. MET: $53.51B
AFL [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $57.98B. MET’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $53.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $139.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $25.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMET’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AFL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MET’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AFL is a better buy in the long-term than MET.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MET’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MET’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AFL is a better buy in the short-term than MET.

Price Growth

AFL (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а +1.27% price change this week, while MET (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -0.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFL is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

MET is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+0.30% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFL($58B) has a higher market cap than MET($53.5B). AFL has higher P/E ratio than MET: AFL (24.24) vs MET (13.37). AFL YTD gains are higher at: 5.784 vs. MET (-1.771). MET has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. AFL (75.9B). AFL has less debt than MET: AFL (8.93B) vs MET (19.9B). MET has higher revenues than AFL: MET (72.1B) vs AFL (16.2B).
AFLMETAFL / MET
Capitalization58B53.5B108%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD5.784-1.771-327%
P/E Ratio24.2413.37181%
Revenue16.2B72.1B22%
Total Cash75.9B113B67%
Total Debt8.93B19.9B45%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AFL vs MET: Fundamental Ratings
AFL
MET
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8171
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
324
SMR RATING
1..100
9599
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4254
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
987
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MET's Valuation (40) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as AFL (69). This means that MET’s stock grew similarly to AFL’s over the last 12 months.

AFL's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MET (24). This means that AFL’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

AFL's SMR Rating (95) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MET (99). This means that AFL’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

AFL's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MET (54). This means that AFL’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

AFL's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for MET (87). This means that AFL’s stock grew significantly faster than MET’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFLMET
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MAYZ33.270.50
+1.52%
TrueShares Structured Outcome May ETF
NBET32.730.07
+0.22%
Neuberger Berman Engy Trnstn & InfrasETF
SDHY17.040.02
+0.12%
PGIM Short Duration High Yield Opportunities Fund
SLYV88.56-0.25
-0.28%
SPDR® S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF
EWO30.77-0.17
-0.55%
iShares MSCI Austria ETF