AFL
Price
$109.79
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 28 closing price
One day until earnings call
MET
Price
$83.09
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 28 closing price
Earnings call today
Ad is loading...

AFL vs MET

Header iconAFL vs MET Comparison
Open Charts AFL vs METBanner chart's image
Aflac
Price$109.79
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.16M
CapitalizationN/A
MetLife
Price$83.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.7M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
AFL vs MET Comparison Chart
Loading...
AFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
MET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
AFL vs. MET commentary
Oct 30, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFL is a Buy and MET is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 30, 2024
Stock price -- (AFL: $109.79 vs. MET: $83.09)
Brand notoriety: AFL: Not notable vs. MET: Notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFL: 84% vs. MET: 86%
Market capitalization -- AFL: $49.4B vs. MET: $53.28B
AFL [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $49.4B. MET’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $53.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $133.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $24.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMET’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AFL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MET’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, AFL is a better buy in the long-term than MET.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MET’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MET’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AFL and MET are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AFL (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -2.63% price change this week, while MET (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -2.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +2.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFL is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.

MET is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+2.62% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MET($53.3B) has a higher market cap than AFL($49.4B). MET has higher P/E ratio than AFL: MET (40.71) vs AFL (10.95). AFL YTD gains are higher at: 35.336 vs. MET (28.663). MET has more cash in the bank: 308B vs. AFL (77.6B). AFL has less debt than MET: AFL (7.36B) vs MET (18.8B). MET has higher revenues than AFL: MET (66.4B) vs AFL (18.8B).
AFLMETAFL / MET
Capitalization49.4B53.3B93%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD35.33628.663123%
P/E Ratio10.9540.7127%
Revenue18.8B66.4B28%
Total Cash77.6B308B25%
Total Debt7.36B18.8B39%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AFL vs MET: Fundamental Ratings
AFL
MET
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7969
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
916
SMR RATING
1..100
9499
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1824
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
50100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4985

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MET's Valuation (38) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as AFL (66). This means that MET’s stock grew similarly to AFL’s over the last 12 months.

AFL's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MET (16). This means that AFL’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

AFL's SMR Rating (94) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MET (99). This means that AFL’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

AFL's Price Growth Rating (18) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MET (24). This means that AFL’s stock grew similarly to MET’s over the last 12 months.

AFL's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MET (100). This means that AFL’s stock grew somewhat faster than MET’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFLMET
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
MET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME22.732.16
+10.50%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X69907.7600001978.460900
+2.91%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
AAPL233.401.99
+0.86%
Apple
SPY580.831.79
+0.31%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA262.51-6.68
-2.48%
Tesla