AFL
Price
$127.48
Change
+$0.12 (+0.09%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
64.89B
3 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UNM
Price
$86.11
Change
-$0.66 (-0.76%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
13.63B
92 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFL vs UNM

AFL vs UNM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Aug 03, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Aflac (AFL) vs. Unum Group (UNM) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Aflac (AFL) maintains a significantly larger market capitalization of approximately $59 billion compared to Unum Group (UNM)’s $12.5 billion, highlighting differences in scale within the life insurance sector.
  • Year-to-date performance shows AFL delivering stronger returns at approximately 18.72%, outperforming UNM’s 15.50% in recent market activity.
  • Both companies operate in the Insurance - Life industry, with AFL demonstrating superior long-term annualized returns of 16.29% over 10 years versus UNM’s 13.82%.
  • Market correlation between the two stocks remains low at 0.47, suggesting limited synchronized price movements and potential diversification benefits for investors.
  • Recent relative performance favors AFL, with a 3.54% outperformance over the past 12 months amid broader sector dynamics.
  • Sector exposure and business models position both as established players, though differences in growth drivers and risk profiles create distinct trade-offs for portfolio allocation.

Introduction

Investors and traders seeking exposure to the life insurance sector often evaluate Aflac (AFL) and Unum Group (UNM) due to their established positions in supplemental and disability insurance products. This comparison examines their business models, recent stock behavior, and relative positioning in the current market environment. Market participants focused on financial services, including those monitoring sector rotation or relative value opportunities, may find this analysis relevant for assessing stability, momentum, and potential portfolio fit. The evaluation draws on verifiable metrics such as market capitalization, historical returns, and performance differentials to provide a balanced view without speculative forecasts.

Aflac (AFL) Overview and Recent Performance

Aflac (AFL) operates as a leading provider of supplemental insurance products, including cancer, accident, and hospital indemnity coverage, primarily in the United States and Japan. In recent market activity, the stock has shown resilience within the life insurance sector, supported by steady demand for its specialized offerings. Broader economic conditions and interest rate environments have influenced sentiment, with the company benefiting from its scale and diversified revenue streams. Recent weeks have reflected consistent performance relative to peers, driven by operational stability rather than single events. Market positioning remains solid, with AFL’s larger footprint contributing to steady investor interest amid fluctuating equity markets.

Unum Group (UNM) Overview and Recent Performance

Unum Group (UNM) specializes in disability, life, and voluntary benefits insurance, serving employers and individuals across the United States and select international markets. Recent market activity has seen the stock navigate sector pressures, with performance reflecting its focus on workplace benefits amid evolving labor and economic trends. In recent weeks, UNM has demonstrated moderate momentum, influenced by its exposure to employment-related insurance demand. The company’s positioning emphasizes targeted product lines, contributing to a distinct risk profile compared to larger peers. Overall sentiment in the period has aligned with broader financial services movements without notable divergence from industry averages.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating suitability for prevailing market conditions earn placement in this focused section, which highlights bots with varied trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics. Available bots span a wide range of metrics, including different win rates, drawdown profiles, and ticker-specific optimizations, allowing users to explore options aligned with individual preferences. This resource provides an informational overview of automated trading tools without endorsing specific outcomes. Explore the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for additional details.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Aflac (AFL) and Unum Group (UNM) both participate in the life insurance industry but differ in scale and product emphasis. AFL’s larger market capitalization supports broader geographic reach and supplemental coverage lines, while UNM concentrates on disability and voluntary benefits with a more focused employer-client base. Recent momentum has favored AFL, evidenced by higher year-to-date and trailing returns, though UNM offers potential for investors seeking smaller-cap exposure within the same sector. Risk factors include interest rate sensitivity and claims experience for both, with AFL’s size potentially providing greater stability during volatility. Market sentiment reflects AFL’s stronger relative positioning, while UNM’s lower correlation to AFL (0.47) may appeal for diversification. Growth drivers center on demographic trends and employment levels, creating trade-offs in risk-adjusted profiles rather than outright superiority.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including stronger recent returns, larger scale, and consistent trend positioning, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic preference to Aflac (AFL) over Unum Group (UNM). This assessment rests on relative performance differentials and market capitalization advantages rather than guarantees of future results. UNM retains relevance for strategies emphasizing smaller entities or specific benefit lines, underscoring the value of individualized evaluation in portfolio construction.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
AFL vs. UNM commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFL is a StrongBuy and UNM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (AFL: $127.48 vs. UNM: $86.11)
Brand notoriety: AFL and UNM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFL: 82% vs. UNM: 92%
Market capitalization -- AFL: $64.89B vs. UNM: $13.63B
AFL [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $64.89B. UNM’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $13.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $154.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $19.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUNM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AFL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UNM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, UNM is a better buy in the long-term than AFL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFL’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UNM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UNM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UNM is a better buy in the short-term than AFL.

Price Growth

AFL (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а +1.50% price change this week, while UNM (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -0.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +1.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFL is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

UNM is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+1.10% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFL($64.9B) has a higher market cap than UNM($13.6B). UNM has higher P/E ratio than AFL: UNM (19.98) vs AFL (14.57). AFL YTD gains are higher at: 16.823 vs. UNM (13.110). AFL has more cash in the bank: 71.5B vs. UNM (36.5B). UNM has less debt than AFL: UNM (3.76B) vs AFL (7.91B). AFL has higher revenues than UNM: AFL (18.3B) vs UNM (13.2B).
AFLUNMAFL / UNM
Capitalization64.9B13.6B477%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.82313.110128%
P/E Ratio14.5719.9873%
Revenue18.3B13.2B139%
Total Cash71.5B36.5B196%
Total Debt7.91B3.76B210%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AFL vs UNM: Fundamental Ratings
AFL
UNM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3278
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
33
SMR RATING
1..100
7191
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1848
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
587
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UNM's Valuation (38) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AFL (71). This means that UNM’s stock grew somewhat faster than AFL’s over the last 12 months.

UNM's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as AFL (3). This means that UNM’s stock grew similarly to AFL’s over the last 12 months.

AFL's SMR Rating (71) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as UNM (91). This means that AFL’s stock grew similarly to UNM’s over the last 12 months.

AFL's Price Growth Rating (18) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as UNM (48). This means that AFL’s stock grew similarly to UNM’s over the last 12 months.

UNM's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AFL (58). This means that UNM’s stock grew somewhat faster than AFL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFLUNM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
35%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
32%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AFL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UNM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FEDU8.050.28
+3.57%
Four Seasons Education (Cayman)
E55.56N/A
N/A
ENI SpA
RWAY5.46-0.06
-1.09%
Runway Growth Finance Corp
BGC11.52-0.16
-1.37%
BGC Group
IRMD90.86-4.35
-4.57%
iRadimed Corp

AFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFL has been loosely correlated with CNO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AFL jumps, then CNO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFL
1D Price
Change %
AFL100%
+0.09%
CNO - AFL
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.99%
GNW - AFL
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.31%
MET - AFL
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.97%
UNM - AFL
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
PRI - AFL
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.04%
More

UNM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UNM has been loosely correlated with CNO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UNM jumps, then CNO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNM
1D Price
Change %
UNM100%
-0.76%
CNO - UNM
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.99%
MET - UNM
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.97%
PRI - UNM
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.04%
GL - UNM
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
LNC - UNM
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.89%
More