ALV
Price
$121.88
Change
+$1.62 (+1.35%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
9.12B
3 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CPS
Price
$27.02
Change
-$0.73 (-2.63%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
479.75M
16 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALV vs CPS

ALV vs CPS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALV vs. CPS commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALV is a Buy and CPS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (ALV: $121.88 vs. CPS: $27.02)
Brand notoriety: ALV and CPS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALV: 98% vs. CPS: 69%
Market capitalization -- ALV: $9.12B vs. CPS: $479.75M
ALV [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $9.12B. CPS’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $479.75M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $72.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALV’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCPS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ALV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CPS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ALV is a better buy in the long-term than CPS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALV’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CPS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALV’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CPS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ALV is a better buy in the short-term than CPS.

Price Growth

ALV (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +1.71% price change this week, while CPS (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -3.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -4.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALV is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2026.

CPS is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-4.12% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALV($9.12B) has a higher market cap than CPS($480M). CPS has higher P/E ratio than ALV: CPS (24.04) vs ALV (13.12). ALV YTD gains are higher at: 4.260 vs. CPS (-17.697). ALV has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.48B vs. CPS (155M). ALV has more cash in the bank: 342M vs. CPS (118M). CPS has less debt than ALV: CPS (1.24B) vs ALV (2.25B). ALV has higher revenues than CPS: ALV (11B) vs CPS (2.76B).
ALVCPSALV / CPS
Capitalization9.12B480M1,901%
EBITDA1.48B155M954%
Gain YTD4.260-17.697-24%
P/E Ratio13.1224.0455%
Revenue11B2.76B399%
Total Cash342M118M290%
Total Debt2.25B1.24B181%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALV vs CPS: Fundamental Ratings
ALV
CPS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6964
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
62100
SMR RATING
1..100
34100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5460
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5417
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ALV's Valuation (8) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPS (59). This means that ALV’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPS’s over the last 12 months.

ALV's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPS (100). This means that ALV’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPS’s over the last 12 months.

ALV's SMR Rating (34) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is significantly better than the same rating for CPS (100). This means that ALV’s stock grew significantly faster than CPS’s over the last 12 months.

ALV's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as CPS (60). This means that ALV’s stock grew similarly to CPS’s over the last 12 months.

CPS's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ALV (54). This means that CPS’s stock grew somewhat faster than ALV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALVCPS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CPS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCATX64.44N/A
N/A
Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Gr Stk I
PMBPX39.86N/A
N/A
Principal MidCap R5
PIIOX14.94N/A
N/A
Principal International Equity Index R3
JHTAX21.64N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Hedged Equity 3 A
IREIX15.42N/A
N/A
Nomura Real Estate Securities I

CPS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPS has been loosely correlated with MGA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CPS jumps, then MGA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPS
1D Price
Change %
CPS100%
-2.63%
MGA - CPS
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
ALV - CPS
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.35%
PHIN - CPS
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.23%
LEA - CPS
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.62%
VC - CPS
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.85%
More