ALV
Price
$117.11
Change
-$0.24 (-0.20%)
Updated
Nov 19, 01:28 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.91B
72 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PHIN
Price
$52.50
Change
-$0.03 (-0.06%)
Updated
Nov 19, 01:56 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.02B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALV vs PHIN

Header iconALV vs PHIN Comparison
Open Charts ALV vs PHINBanner chart's image
Autoliv
Price$117.11
Change-$0.24 (-0.20%)
Volume$500
Capitalization8.91B
PHINIA
Price$52.50
Change-$0.03 (-0.06%)
Volume$163
Capitalization2.02B
ALV vs PHIN Comparison Chart in %
ALV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PHIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALV vs. PHIN commentary
Nov 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALV is a Hold and PHIN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 19, 2025
Stock price -- (ALV: $117.35 vs. PHIN: $52.53)
Brand notoriety: ALV and PHIN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALV: 78% vs. PHIN: 116%
Market capitalization -- ALV: $8.91B vs. PHIN: $2.02B
ALV [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $8.91B. PHIN’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $2.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $83B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALV’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePHIN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ALV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PHIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ALV is a better buy in the long-term than PHIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALV’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PHIN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALV’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • PHIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PHIN is a better buy in the short-term than ALV.

Price Growth

ALV (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -4.70% price change this week, while PHIN (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -2.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -4.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.67%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALV is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-4.50% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALV($8.92B) has a higher market cap than PHIN($2.02B). PHIN has higher P/E ratio than ALV: PHIN (23.53) vs ALV (12.16). ALV YTD gains are higher at: 27.764 vs. PHIN (10.870). ALV has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.52B vs. PHIN (418M). PHIN has more cash in the bank: 349M vs. ALV (225M). PHIN has less debt than ALV: PHIN (1.05B) vs ALV (2.19B). ALV has higher revenues than PHIN: ALV (10.6B) vs PHIN (3.43B).
ALVPHINALV / PHIN
Capitalization8.92B2.02B442%
EBITDA1.52B418M362%
Gain YTD27.76410.870255%
P/E Ratio12.1623.5352%
Revenue10.6B3.43B309%
Total Cash225M349M64%
Total Debt2.19B1.05B209%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALV: Fundamental Ratings
ALV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
19
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
49
SMR RATING
1..100
30
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALVPHIN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PHIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
REIT26.460.06
+0.22%
ALPS Active REIT ETF
TOK134.54N/A
N/A
iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF
CNYUSD0.14N/A
N/A
China Yuan - United States Dollar
CADHKD5.53N/A
N/A
Canadian Dollar - Hong Kong Dollar
CRBN224.31-1.76
-0.78%
iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF

ALV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALV has been closely correlated with BWA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ALV jumps, then BWA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALV
1D Price
Change %
ALV100%
+0.20%
BWA - ALV
74%
Closely correlated
+0.28%
VC - ALV
74%
Closely correlated
+1.24%
APTV - ALV
72%
Closely correlated
-1.41%
LEA - ALV
71%
Closely correlated
+0.69%
MGA - ALV
68%
Closely correlated
-0.31%
More

PHIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PHIN has been loosely correlated with ALV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PHIN jumps, then ALV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PHIN
1D Price
Change %
PHIN100%
+0.10%
ALV - PHIN
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
VC - PHIN
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
BWA - PHIN
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
APTV - PHIN
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.41%
ALSN - PHIN
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.54%
More