AM
Price
$22.14
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 24 closing price
Capitalization
10.51B
64 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LNG
Price
$280.79
Change
+$3.28 (+1.18%)
Updated
Aug 24 closing price
Capitalization
57.99B
65 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AM vs LNG

AM vs LNG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AM vs. LNG commentary
Aug 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AM is a StrongBuy and LNG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 25, 2026
Stock price -- (AM: $22.14 vs. LNG: $280.79)
Brand notoriety: AM and LNG are both notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AM: 74% vs. LNG: 60%
Market capitalization -- AM: $10.51B vs. LNG: $57.99B
AM [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $10.51B. LNG’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $57.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $109.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $17.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AM’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileLNG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • LNG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LNG is a better buy in the long-term than AM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AM’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LNG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AM’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • LNG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AM is a better buy in the short-term than LNG.

Price Growth

AM (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -0.05% price change this week, while LNG (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +5.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was -0.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

AM is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

LNG is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (-0.13% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LNG($58B) has a higher market cap than AM($10.5B). AM has higher P/E ratio than LNG: AM (26.67) vs LNG (21.27). LNG YTD gains are higher at: 45.479 vs. AM (28.603). LNG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.89B vs. AM (973M). LNG has more cash in the bank: 308M vs. AM (0). AM has less debt than LNG: AM (3.61B) vs LNG (26.4B). LNG has higher revenues than AM: LNG (21.5B) vs AM (1.31B).
AMLNGAM / LNG
Capitalization10.5B58B18%
EBITDA973M7.89B12%
Gain YTD28.60345.47963%
P/E Ratio26.6721.27125%
Revenue1.31B21.5B6%
Total Cash0308M-
Total Debt3.61B26.4B14%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AM vs LNG: Fundamental Ratings
AM
LNG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6159
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
211
SMR RATING
1..100
4546
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5145
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1513
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5048

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AM's Valuation (19) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as LNG (47). This means that AM’s stock grew similarly to LNG’s over the last 12 months.

AM's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as LNG (11). This means that AM’s stock grew similarly to LNG’s over the last 12 months.

AM's SMR Rating (45) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as LNG (46). This means that AM’s stock grew similarly to LNG’s over the last 12 months.

LNG's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as AM (51). This means that LNG’s stock grew similarly to AM’s over the last 12 months.

LNG's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as AM (15). This means that LNG’s stock grew similarly to AM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMLNG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LNG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GENB17.721.60
+9.93%
Generate Biomedicines Inc
MAGN12.430.09
+0.73%
Magnera Corporation
BTSGU196.221.17
+0.60%
BrightSpring Health Services
EHC120.920.61
+0.51%
Encompass Health Corp
WNW2.450.01
+0.41%
Meiwu Technology Company Limited

LNG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNG has been loosely correlated with OKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LNG jumps, then OKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNG
1D Price
Change %
LNG100%
+1.18%
OKE - LNG
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.33%
KMI - LNG
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
WMB - LNG
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.68%
KNTK - LNG
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.37%
ET - LNG
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
More