Advertisement
AMH vs ELS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMH is a Hold and ELS is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileELS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- AMH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- ELS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMH’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ELS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AMH’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
- ELS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
AMH (@Media Conglomerates) experienced а -2.07% price change this week, while ELS (@Media Conglomerates) price change was -0.37% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was -0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.25%.
Reported Earning Dates
AMH is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
ELS is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Media Conglomerates (-0.36% weekly)Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.
| AMH | ELS | AMH / ELS | |
| Capitalization | 12.7B | 11.9B | 107% |
| EBITDA | 1.16B | 727M | 159% |
| Gain YTD | -7.236 | -6.172 | 117% |
| P/E Ratio | 30.75 | 31.70 | 97% |
| Revenue | 1.8B | 1.43B | 126% |
| Total Cash | 323M | 9.91M | 3,260% |
| Total Debt | 5.18B | 3.25B | 159% |
AMH | ELS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 68 | 20 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | 76 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 89 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 83 | 40 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | 75 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ELS's Valuation (76) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as AMH (88). This means that ELS’s stock grew similarly to AMH’s over the last 12 months.
AMH's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as ELS (89). This means that AMH’s stock grew similarly to ELS’s over the last 12 months.
ELS's SMR Rating (40) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMH (83). This means that ELS’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMH’s over the last 12 months.
ELS's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as AMH (76). This means that ELS’s stock grew similarly to AMH’s over the last 12 months.
ELS's P/E Growth Rating (75) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as AMH (82). This means that ELS’s stock grew similarly to AMH’s over the last 12 months.
| AMH | ELS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 35% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 49% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 50% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 58% | 9 days ago 51% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 51% | 19 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 4 days ago 57% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SHPP | 28.39 | N/A | N/A |
| Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF | |||
| ZAPR | 25.40 | N/A | N/A |
| Innovator Equity Dfnd Prt ETF -1 Yr Apr | |||
| EMGF | 55.81 | -0.07 | -0.13% |
| iShares Em Mkts Eq Fac ETF | |||
| FEMB | 29.35 | -0.12 | -0.41% |
| First Trust Emerging Mkts Lcl Ccy Bd ETF | |||
| SQEW | 35.64 | -0.20 | -0.57% |
| LeaderShares® Equity Skew ETF | |||
AMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMH has been closely correlated with INVH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMH jumps, then INVH could also see price increases.
ELS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ELS has been closely correlated with SUI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ELS jumps, then SUI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ELS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELS | 100% | -0.05% | ||
| SUI - ELS | 72% Closely correlated | -0.98% | ||
| UMH - ELS | 69% Closely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| CUBE - ELS | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.06% | ||
| AMH - ELS | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.42% | ||
| FCPT - ELS | 64% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||