Amkor Technology (AMKR) and GlobalFoundries (GFS) operate in the semiconductor industry, a sector experiencing robust growth driven by artificial intelligence, data centers, and automotive applications. AMKR specializes in outsourced semiconductor assembly and test (OSAT) services, while GFS focuses on wafer fabrication as a pure-play foundry. This comparison is particularly relevant for investors and traders seeking exposure to semiconductor supply chain plays amid recent market rallies. By examining recent performance, financial metrics, and market positioning, readers can assess relative strengths in this high-growth environment.
Amkor Technology, headquartered in Tempe, Arizona, is a leading provider of OSAT services, supporting integrated device manufacturers, fabless companies, and foundries with packaging solutions for mobile, automotive, and computing devices. In recent market activity, AMKR shares have traded around $71, within a 52-week range of $17 to $79, reflecting significant volatility and upside from lows. The stock has surged 80% year-to-date and over 300% in the past year, outperforming broader indices. Key influences include record Q1 2026 revenue of $1.68 billion, up 27% year-over-year, driven by strong demand in communications and computing, with gross margins expanding to 14.2%. Recent developments, such as groundbreaking on a new advanced packaging facility in Arizona and a proposed $1 billion convertible notes offering, have bolstered sentiment, signaling capacity expansion for AI-related growth.
GlobalFoundries, based in Malta, New York, operates as a semiconductor foundry, manufacturing chips for smartphones, IoT, automotive, and data centers using mature process technologies. Its shares recently hovered near $65, in a 52-week range of $32 to $65, with year-to-date gains of 86% and one-year returns of 85%. Performance has been supported by steady demand in key end-markets, though less explosive than peers. The company awaits Q1 2026 results, with expectations of $1.62 billion in revenue and $0.35 EPS, indicating slight growth. Recent acquisitions like Advanced Micro Foundry enhance its silicon photonics capabilities for AI infrastructure, while ongoing U.S. investments underline long-term positioning. Sentiment remains positive but tempered by analyst targets below current levels.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 350 available models that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies and timeframes. These bots deliver real-time signals for copy trading, with standout stats including annualized returns up to 163%, win rates as high as 88%, profit factors over 7, and profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 6. Semiconductor-focused bots, such as those trading AMKR alongside LRCX, TER, and ASML, have posted 97% annualized returns with 63% win rates on 60-minute intervals. Others target small caps or ETFs with average trade durations from hours to days. Explore these high-performing, market-adapted bots to enhance your trading approach.
AMKR and GFS both benefit from semiconductor tailwinds like AI and edge computing, but differ in business models: AMKR's OSAT focus offers higher margins with lower capital intensity compared to GFS's fab-heavy foundry operations. Growth drivers for AMKR include advanced packaging for high-performance computing, projecting over 20% sector growth, while GFS emphasizes mature nodes for automotive and IoT. Recent momentum favors AMKR with triple-digit one-year gains versus GFS's more moderate rise. Risk factors include cyclical demand and high CapEx (capital expenditures) for both, though GFS's larger $36 billion market cap provides scale. Market sentiment leans toward AMKR's execution, reflected in higher analyst targets relative to price.
Tickeron's AI currently favors AMKR over GFS, based on superior trend consistency, record revenue growth in recent quarters, and inclusion in high-performing AI trading bots. AMKR's lower PEG ratio and explosive multi-year momentum position it better for near-term catalysts in advanced packaging, though GFS offers stability through its foundry scale. This assessment reflects observable relative positioning rather than guarantees.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMKR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGFS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMKR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GFS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
AMKR (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а -7.43% price change this week, while GFS (@Semiconductors) price change was -12.99% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was -5.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +104.94%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -14.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +76.28%.
AMKR is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.
GFS is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.
The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.
@Semiconductors (-14.22% weekly)The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
| AMKR | GFS | AMKR / GFS | |
| Capitalization | 17.3B | 41B | 42% |
| EBITDA | 1.25B | 2.26B | 55% |
| Gain YTD | 76.851 | 114.261 | 67% |
| P/E Ratio | 40.01 | 51.10 | 78% |
| Revenue | 7.07B | 6.84B | 103% |
| Total Cash | 1.85B | 3.07B | 60% |
| Total Debt | 1.52B | 1.72B | 88% |
AMKR | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 71 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 40 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 24 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 72 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| AMKR | GFS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 9 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 71% | 1 day ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 60% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMKR has been closely correlated with RMBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMKR jumps, then RMBS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMKR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMKR | 100% | -1.83% | ||
| RMBS - AMKR | 79% Closely correlated | -5.94% | ||
| AMAT - AMKR | 74% Closely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| MPWR - AMKR | 74% Closely correlated | -3.85% | ||
| LSCC - AMKR | 73% Closely correlated | -3.81% | ||
| ADI - AMKR | 73% Closely correlated | -2.95% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFS has been closely correlated with KLIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GFS jumps, then KLIC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GFS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GFS | 100% | -0.58% | ||
| KLIC - GFS | 72% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| FORM - GFS | 69% Closely correlated | -3.95% | ||
| ENTG - GFS | 67% Closely correlated | -4.07% | ||
| LRCX - GFS | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| VECO - GFS | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.88% | ||
More | ||||