Advertisement
AMRZ vs TTAM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMRZ is a Buy and TTAM is a Buy.
| AMRZ | TTAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 10 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 65% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMRZ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while TTAM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AMRZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TTAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMRZ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTAM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AMRZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
- TTAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
AMRZ (@Construction Materials) experienced а +1.81% price change this week, while TTAM (@Construction Materials) price change was +3.98% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -15.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was -15.44%.
Reported Earning Dates
AMRZ is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
TTAM is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Construction Materials (-1.64% weekly)Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AVSD | 80.94 | 0.83 | +1.04% |
| Avantis Responsible International Equity ETF (AVSD) | |||
| SNPD | 28.98 | 0.14 | +0.47% |
| Xtrackers S&P Dividend Aristocrats Screened ETF (SNPD) | |||
| TJAN | 28.62 | N/A | N/A |
| Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to January 2027 | |||
| BMOP | 23.56 | -0.18 | -0.74% |
| BNY Mellon Municipal Opportunities ETF (BMOP) | |||
| OKLL | 10.14 | -0.15 | -1.46% |
| Defiance Daily Target 2x Long OKLO ETF (OKLL) | |||
AMRZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMRZ has been loosely correlated with MLM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMRZ jumps, then MLM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMRZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMRZ | 100% | +2.66% | ||
| MLM - AMRZ | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| EXP - AMRZ | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| CRH - AMRZ | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.29% | ||
| VMC - AMRZ | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.37% | ||
| TTAM - AMRZ | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.37% | ||
More | ||||
TTAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTAM has been closely correlated with EXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TTAM jumps, then EXP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TTAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTAM | 100% | +2.37% | ||
| EXP - TTAM | 69% Closely correlated | +0.60% | ||
| CRH - TTAM | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.29% | ||
| MLM - TTAM | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| VMC - TTAM | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.37% | ||
| AMRZ - TTAM | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.66% | ||
More | ||||