MLM
Price
$534.92
Change
+$9.65 (+1.84%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
32.13B
73 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TTAM
Price
$15.17
Change
+$0.22 (+1.47%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
2.8B
80 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MLM vs TTAM

MLM vs TTAM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MLM vs. TTAM commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLM is a Hold and TTAM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2026
Stock price -- (MLM: $534.92 vs. TTAM: $15.17)
Brand notoriety: MLM and TTAM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MLM: 89% vs. TTAM: 104%
Market capitalization -- MLM: $32.13B vs. TTAM: $2.8B
MLM [@Construction Materials] is valued at $32.13B. TTAM’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $2.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $63.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $12.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MLM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTTAM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MLM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TTAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MLM is a better buy in the long-term than TTAM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MLM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTAM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MLM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TTAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TTAM is a better buy in the short-term than MLM.

Price Growth

MLM (@Construction Materials) experienced а -2.37% price change this week, while TTAM (@Construction Materials) price change was -5.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

MLM is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

TTAM is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-0.92% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLM($32.1B) has a higher market cap than TTAM($2.8B). MLM has higher P/E ratio than TTAM: MLM (34.78) vs TTAM (15.80). TTAM YTD gains are higher at: -7.517 vs. MLM (-13.863). MLM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.09B vs. TTAM (378M). MLM has more cash in the bank: 112M vs. TTAM (65.7M). TTAM has less debt than MLM: TTAM (574M) vs MLM (6.35B). MLM has higher revenues than TTAM: MLM (6.69B) vs TTAM (1.71B).
MLMTTAMMLM / TTAM
Capitalization32.1B2.8B1,148%
EBITDA2.09B378M552%
Gain YTD-13.863-7.517184%
P/E Ratio34.7815.80220%
Revenue6.69B1.71B391%
Total Cash112M65.7M170%
Total Debt6.35B574M1,105%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MLM: Fundamental Ratings
MLM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
14
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
47
SMR RATING
1..100
41
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MLMTTAM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MLM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TTAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACDC4.830.39
+8.78%
ProFrac Holding Corp
DPRO4.490.21
+4.91%
Draganfly Inc
DIOD94.043.30
+3.64%
Diodes
SYY84.101.04
+1.25%
Sysco Corp
IQST0.990.01
+0.62%
iQSTEL Inc.

MLM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLM has been closely correlated with VMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MLM jumps, then VMC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLM
1D Price
Change %
MLM100%
+1.84%
VMC - MLM
88%
Closely correlated
+1.98%
CRH - MLM
72%
Closely correlated
+2.13%
EXP - MLM
66%
Closely correlated
+2.03%
TTAM - MLM
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
AMRZ - MLM
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.38%
More

TTAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTAM has been closely correlated with EXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TTAM jumps, then EXP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TTAM
1D Price
Change %
TTAM100%
+1.47%
EXP - TTAM
71%
Closely correlated
+2.03%
MLM - TTAM
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.84%
CRH - TTAM
66%
Loosely correlated
+2.13%
VMC - TTAM
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.98%
AMRZ - TTAM
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.38%
More