MLM
Price
$569.35
Change
-$8.37 (-1.45%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
34.19B
16 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TTAM
Price
$16.96
Change
-$0.39 (-2.25%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
3.13B
21 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MLM vs TTAM

MLM vs TTAM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MLM vs. TTAM commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLM is a StrongBuy and TTAM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (MLM: $569.35 vs. TTAM: $16.96)
Brand notoriety: MLM and TTAM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MLM: 61% vs. TTAM: 47%
Market capitalization -- MLM: $34.19B vs. TTAM: $3.13B
MLM [@Construction Materials] is valued at $34.19B. TTAM’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $3.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $68.63B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $13.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MLM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTTAM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MLM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TTAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TTAM is a better buy in the long-term than MLM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MLM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTAM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MLM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TTAM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TTAM is a better buy in the short-term than MLM.

Price Growth

MLM (@Construction Materials) experienced а -5.94% price change this week, while TTAM (@Construction Materials) price change was -8.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -3.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

MLM is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

TTAM is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-3.24% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLM($34.2B) has a higher market cap than TTAM($3.13B). MLM has higher P/E ratio than TTAM: MLM (35.70) vs TTAM (16.96). TTAM YTD gains are higher at: 3.396 vs. MLM (-8.318). MLM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.09B vs. TTAM (381M). TTAM has less debt than MLM: TTAM (455M) vs MLM (5.69B). MLM has higher revenues than TTAM: MLM (6.35B) vs TTAM (1.67B).
MLMTTAMMLM / TTAM
Capitalization34.2B3.13B1,094%
EBITDA2.09B381M549%
Gain YTD-8.3183.396-245%
P/E Ratio35.7016.96210%
Revenue6.35B1.67B380%
Total Cash273MN/A-
Total Debt5.69B455M1,250%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MLM: Fundamental Ratings
MLM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
28
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
37
SMR RATING
1..100
39
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MLMTTAM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MLM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TTAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DVOL37.12N/A
N/A
FirstTrustDorseyWrightMomt&LwVolatil ETF
LCDS70.71N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Sci Lg Cor ETF
VNLA48.88-0.02
-0.04%
Janus Henderson Short Duration Inc ETF
MMAX27.12-0.02
-0.07%
iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF
XTN114.72-0.55
-0.48%
State Street® SPDR® S&PTrsptnETF

MLM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLM has been closely correlated with VMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MLM jumps, then VMC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLM
1D Price
Change %
MLM100%
-1.45%
VMC - MLM
88%
Closely correlated
-0.84%
CRH - MLM
70%
Closely correlated
-1.91%
EXP - MLM
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.20%
TTAM - MLM
64%
Loosely correlated
-2.25%
AMRZ - MLM
62%
Loosely correlated
-3.25%
More

TTAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTAM has been closely correlated with EXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TTAM jumps, then EXP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TTAM
1D Price
Change %
TTAM100%
-2.25%
EXP - TTAM
68%
Closely correlated
-2.20%
MLM - TTAM
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.45%
CRH - TTAM
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.91%
VMC - TTAM
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.84%
AMRZ - TTAM
58%
Loosely correlated
-3.25%
More