Advertisement
MLM vs TTAM
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Martin Marietta Materials (MLM) vs. Titan America SA (TTAM) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both MLM and TTAM supply essential building materials like aggregates and cement, benefiting from U.S. infrastructure demand.
- MLM holds a dominant market position with a $37 billion market cap, dwarfing TTAM's $3 billion.
- Over the past year, TTAM delivered a 26% total return, edging out MLM's 22%.
- MLM trades at a premium price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 37 versus TTAM's 16, reflecting higher growth expectations.
- Year-to-date gains are modest for both, with MLM at 2% and TTAM at 0.6%, amid sector pressures and earnings anticipation.
- Recent leadership changes at MLM and solid Q4 results at TTAM highlight operational focus in a competitive landscape.
Introduction
In the building materials sector, MLM and TTAM stand out as key players supplying aggregates, cement, and related products critical for infrastructure and construction projects. This stock comparison analyzes their business models, recent performance, and market positioning amid ongoing U.S. infrastructure investments and economic shifts. Traders seeking sector exposure and investors evaluating relative value in materials stocks will find insights into momentum, valuation, and growth drivers. With both companies reporting upcoming quarterly results, the analysis highlights contrasts in scale, returns, and sentiment for informed decision-making in today's market environment.
MLM Overview and Recent Performance
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (MLM) is a leading U.S.-based supplier of aggregates—crushed stone, sand, and gravel—along with ready-mixed concrete and asphalt for infrastructure, nonresidential, and residential construction. The company operates through East and West segments, also producing chemicals for industrial uses.
In recent market activity, MLM shares have traded around $610, reflecting a year-to-date gain of about 2% but a slight pullback in recent weeks ahead of its Q1 2026 earnings release on April 30. The stock's 52-week range spans $490 to $711, with a one-year total return of 22%. Sentiment has been influenced by steady infrastructure demand supporting aggregates pricing, offset by high valuations and mixed Q4 2025 results where EPS missed estimates. Analyst previews note expected earnings growth, bolstered by a new chief operating officer appointment, though sector weakness tempers near-term optimism.
TTAM Overview and Recent Performance
Titan America SA (TTAM), a subsidiary of Titan Cement International, manufactures cement, ready-mixed concrete, aggregates, and blocks primarily on the U.S. Eastern Seaboard, with ancillary trading and real estate activities.
Recent weeks have seen TTAM shares hover near $16.30, with a year-to-date return of 0.6% and a stronger one-year gain of 26%. The 52-week range is $12 to $19. Performance reflects resilience post-Q4 2025 results, which showed revenue up 4% to $406 million and adjusted EBITDA up 12%, despite a slight EPS miss. Trading at a lower P/E, sentiment benefits from cost efficiencies and regional demand, though broader sector headwinds and upcoming Q1 2026 earnings on May 5 contribute to cautious positioning. Stable volumes in cement and concrete underpin relative outperformance over the longer term.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of 25 top-performing AI trading bots from its library of 351 bots that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies, including signal agents, virtual agents, and brokerage agents, with customizable timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 minutes, technical or fundamental analysis, and volatility filters. Selected for their suitability to current market conditions, standout performers have delivered impressive results such as annualized returns exceeding 170% over recent 30-day periods and success rates above 73%. Traders can explore these automated tools for various styles and copy high-probability signals. Visit the page to discover bots aligned with today's trends.
Head-to-Head Comparison
MLM and TTAM share sector exposure to construction materials but differ in scale and focus: MLM emphasizes nationwide aggregates with chemical diversification, while TTAM prioritizes cement and ready-mix on the East Coast. Growth drivers include federal infrastructure outlays, though MLM's broader footprint offers resilience against regional slowdowns.
Recent momentum favors TTAM with superior one-year returns, but MLM shows steadier YTD progress. Risk factors involve commodity price volatility and weather impacts, with MLM's size providing lower beta. TTAM's lower P/E signals value, contrasting MLM's growth premium. Market sentiment leans toward MLM for its analyst coverage and operational scale, while TTAM appeals for undervaluation trade-offs.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI analysis currently leans toward MLM due to its superior market positioning, trend consistency in aggregates demand, and scale advantages amid infrastructure catalysts. While TTAM offers compelling one-year momentum and valuation, MLM's stability and broader exposure suggest higher probability of outperformance in the near term, pending earnings outcomes.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLM is a Buy and TTAM is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MLM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTTAM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- MLM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TTAM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MLM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTAM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MLM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- TTAM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
MLM (@Construction Materials) experienced а +3.56% price change this week, while TTAM (@Construction Materials) price change was +6.67% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.78%.
Reported Earning Dates
MLM is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
TTAM is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Construction Materials (-0.83% weekly)Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.
| MLM | TTAM | MLM / TTAM | |
| Capitalization | 36.6B | 3.36B | 1,090% |
| EBITDA | 2.09B | 381M | 549% |
| Gain YTD | -1.792 | 11.016 | -16% |
| P/E Ratio | 38.24 | 18.21 | 210% |
| Revenue | 6.35B | 1.67B | 380% |
| Total Cash | 273M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 5.69B | 455M | 1,250% |
MLM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 33 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 39 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| MLM | TTAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 6 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 61% | 16 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 70% |
Advertisement
TTAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTAM has been loosely correlated with EXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TTAM jumps, then EXP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TTAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTAM | 100% | -0.87% | ||
| EXP - TTAM | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| MLM - TTAM | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.12% | ||
| CRH - TTAM | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.01% | ||
| VMC - TTAM | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| CX - TTAM | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.18% | ||
More | ||||