Advertisement
EXP vs TTAM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EXP is a Hold and TTAM is a StrongBuy.
EXP | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 28 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 88 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| EXP | TTAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 69% | 8 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 15 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 67% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EXP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while TTAM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- EXP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TTAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EXP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTAM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EXP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- TTAM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
EXP (@Construction Materials) experienced а -2.46% price change this week, while TTAM (@Construction Materials) price change was +1.03% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +51.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was -16.58%.
Reported Earning Dates
EXP is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
TTAM is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Construction Materials (+51.68% weekly)Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EMOT | 25.75 | 0.12 | +0.47% |
| First Trust S&P 500 Economic Moat ETF (EMOT) | |||
| LDRI | 24.82 | 0.07 | +0.28% |
| iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF | |||
| TGRT | 47.24 | 0.12 | +0.26% |
| T. Rowe Price Growth ETF (TGRT) | |||
| PSMJ | 34.49 | N/A | N/A |
| Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF (PSMJ) | |||
| EWQ | 41.71 | -0.89 | -2.09% |
| iShares MSCI France ETF (EWQ) | |||
EXP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EXP has been closely correlated with BCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EXP jumps, then BCC could also see price increases.
TTAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTAM has been closely correlated with EXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TTAM jumps, then EXP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TTAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTAM | 100% | +0.29% | ||
| EXP - TTAM | 69% Closely correlated | +1.20% | ||
| CRH - TTAM | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.33% | ||
| MLM - TTAM | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| VMC - TTAM | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| AMRZ - TTAM | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
More | ||||