CRH
Price
$95.01
Change
-$0.99 (-1.03%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
63.21B
94 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TTAM
Price
$15.48
Change
-$0.43 (-2.70%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
2.85B
100 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRH vs TTAM

CRH vs TTAM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRH vs. TTAM commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRH is a StrongBuy and TTAM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (CRH: $95.01 vs. TTAM: $15.48)
Brand notoriety: CRH and TTAM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRH: 166% vs. TTAM: 274%
Market capitalization -- CRH: $63.21B vs. TTAM: $2.85B
CRH [@Construction Materials] is valued at $63.21B. TTAM’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $2.85B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $63.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $12.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTTAM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CRH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TTAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRH is a better buy in the long-term than TTAM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTAM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TTAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TTAM is a better buy in the short-term than CRH.

Price Growth

CRH (@Construction Materials) experienced а -4.87% price change this week, while TTAM (@Construction Materials) price change was -9.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -2.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

CRH is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.

TTAM is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-2.76% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRH($63.2B) has a higher market cap than TTAM($2.85B). CRH (16.79) and TTAM (16.13) have similar P/E ratio . TTAM YTD gains are higher at: -5.627 vs. CRH (-23.324). CRH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.26B vs. TTAM (378M). CRH has more cash in the bank: 3.03B vs. TTAM (65.7M). TTAM has less debt than CRH: TTAM (574M) vs CRH (19.8B). CRH has higher revenues than TTAM: CRH (38.6B) vs TTAM (1.71B).
CRHTTAMCRH / TTAM
Capitalization63.2B2.85B2,214%
EBITDA8.26B378M2,185%
Gain YTD-23.324-5.627414%
P/E Ratio16.7916.13104%
Revenue38.6B1.71B2,255%
Total Cash3.03B65.7M4,604%
Total Debt19.8B574M3,449%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRH: Fundamental Ratings
CRH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
11
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
35
SMR RATING
1..100
54
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
70
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRHTTAM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TTAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BCPC167.554.82
+2.97%
Balchem Corp
CP88.890.73
+0.83%
Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
ASIC24.020.17
+0.71%
Ategrity Specialty Insurance Company Holdings
PSIG1.16-0.01
-0.85%
PS International Group Ltd.
MFIN9.94-0.16
-1.58%
Medallion Financial Corp

CRH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRH has been closely correlated with MLM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRH jumps, then MLM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRH
1D Price
Change %
CRH100%
-1.03%
MLM - CRH
72%
Closely correlated
-2.75%
VMC - CRH
70%
Closely correlated
-0.98%
TTAM - CRH
64%
Loosely correlated
-2.70%
EXP - CRH
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.26%
BCC - CRH
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.33%
More

TTAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTAM has been closely correlated with EXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TTAM jumps, then EXP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TTAM
1D Price
Change %
TTAM100%
-2.70%
EXP - TTAM
70%
Closely correlated
-0.26%
MLM - TTAM
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.75%
CRH - TTAM
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.03%
VMC - TTAM
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.98%
AMRZ - TTAM
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.39%
More