Advertisement
CRH vs TTAM
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CRH plc (CRH) vs. Titan America SA (TTAM) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both CRH and TTAM operate in the building materials sector, with CRH offering broader global exposure and TTAM focused primarily on the U.S. Eastern Seaboard.
- CRH maintains a significantly larger market capitalization and diversified operations across multiple continents compared to the more regionally concentrated TTAM.
- Recent market activity shows CRH benefiting from strategic acquisitions and share repurchase programs, supporting relative stability in performance metrics.
- TTAM demonstrates vertical integration in heavy building materials, potentially offering targeted growth in specific U.S. construction markets amid infrastructure spending.
- Sector sentiment for both stocks remains influenced by construction demand trends, commodity costs, and broader economic indicators over recent weeks.
- Relative positioning highlights trade-offs between CRH's scale and diversification versus TTAM's more focused operational footprint.
Introduction
CRH plc (CRH) and Titan America SA (TTAM) represent two publicly traded companies in the building materials industry, making them relevant for comparison among investors and traders seeking exposure to construction and infrastructure sectors. This analysis examines their business models, recent performance dynamics, and market positioning to assist those evaluating relative value in a sector sensitive to economic cycles, commodity prices, and capital expenditure trends. Professional and retail market participants focused on materials equities may find the contrasts in scale, geographic reach, and operational focus particularly informative for portfolio allocation decisions.
CRH Overview and Recent Performance
CRH plc is a leading global provider of building materials, including aggregates, cement, ready-mixed concrete, and infrastructure components, operating across multiple continents with a primary emphasis on North America and Europe. In recent market activity, the stock has reflected influences from strategic moves such as the announced acquisition of Arcosa and ongoing share buyback initiatives, which have contributed to sentiment around capital returns and portfolio expansion. Broader sector demand for construction materials and infrastructure projects has shaped performance, with the company demonstrating resilience amid fluctuating input costs and regional economic conditions over recent weeks.
TTAM Overview and Recent Performance
Titan America SA operates as a vertically integrated manufacturer and supplier of heavy building materials and services, with a primary focus on the U.S. Eastern Seaboard. As a subsidiary of Titan Cement International, the company benefits from established production capabilities in cement, aggregates, and related products. Recent market activity for TTAM has been influenced by domestic construction trends and infrastructure-related demand, with performance reflecting the company's more concentrated geographic exposure compared to larger peers. Sentiment remains tied to U.S. economic indicators and material pricing dynamics over the recent period.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots designed for various market conditions. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots that trade thousands of different tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and performance profiles. Only the highest-performing and most suitable bots for prevailing market environments earn placement in this trending section, where users can review ranges of historical win rates, drawdowns, and return metrics that typically vary by bot. These tools encompass multiple trading styles and ticker sets, providing data-driven options for different risk tolerances. Explore the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page to identify bots aligned with current conditions.
Head-to-Head Comparison
In business model terms, CRH emphasizes global scale with operations spanning 28 countries and substantial North American revenue contribution, while TTAM maintains a more focused vertical integration on the U.S. Eastern Seaboard. Growth drivers for CRH include M&A (mergers and acquisitions) activity and share repurchases, contrasting with TTAM’s reliance on regional infrastructure and construction spending. Recent momentum has favored CRH through announced deals, whereas TTAM exhibits sensitivity to localized U.S. market factors. Risk factors for CRH involve broader currency and geopolitical exposures, while TTAM faces concentration risk in a single region. Sector exposure remains aligned in building materials, yet market sentiment reflects CRH’s larger capitalization and diversification advantages versus TTAM’s niche positioning.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, operational stability, and recent catalysts including acquisitions and capital returns, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to CRH over TTAM for relative positioning in the building materials space. This assessment draws from CRH’s demonstrated scale and diversification, which may support more consistent performance amid sector volatility, though outcomes remain subject to evolving market conditions and company-specific developments.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRH is a Buy and TTAM is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTTAM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CRH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- TTAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTAM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TTAM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CRH (@Construction Materials) experienced а -4.53% price change this week, while TTAM (@Construction Materials) price change was -8.08% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -3.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.86%.
Reported Earning Dates
CRH is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
TTAM is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Construction Materials (-3.24% weekly)Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.
| CRH | TTAM | CRH / TTAM | |
| Capitalization | 68.6B | 3.13B | 2,194% |
| EBITDA | 7.81B | 381M | 2,051% |
| Gain YTD | -17.110 | 3.396 | -504% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.06 | 16.96 | 112% |
| Revenue | 38.1B | 1.67B | 2,281% |
| Total Cash | 3.24B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 20.4B | 455M | 4,484% |
CRH | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 27 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CRH | TTAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 51% | 6 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 74% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DVOL | 37.12 | N/A | N/A |
| FirstTrustDorseyWrightMomt&LwVolatil ETF | |||
| LCDS | 70.71 | N/A | N/A |
| JPMorgan Fundamental Data Sci Lg Cor ETF | |||
| VNLA | 48.88 | -0.02 | -0.04% |
| Janus Henderson Short Duration Inc ETF | |||
| MMAX | 27.12 | -0.02 | -0.07% |
| iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF | |||
| XTN | 114.72 | -0.55 | -0.48% |
| State Street® SPDR® S&PTrsptnETF | |||
CRH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRH has been closely correlated with MLM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRH jumps, then MLM could also see price increases.
TTAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTAM has been closely correlated with EXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TTAM jumps, then EXP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TTAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTAM | 100% | -2.25% | ||
| EXP - TTAM | 68% Closely correlated | -2.20% | ||
| MLM - TTAM | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.45% | ||
| CRH - TTAM | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.91% | ||
| VMC - TTAM | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.84% | ||
| AMRZ - TTAM | 58% Loosely correlated | -3.25% | ||
More | ||||