Advertisement
CRH vs TTAM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRH is a Hold and TTAM is a StrongBuy.
| CRH | TTAM | CRH / TTAM | |
| Capitalization | 58.9B | 2.69B | 2,188% |
| EBITDA | 8.26B | 378M | 2,185% |
| Gain YTD | -28.251 | -10.992 | 257% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.64 | 15.21 | 103% |
| Revenue | 38.6B | 1.71B | 2,255% |
| Total Cash | 3.03B | 65.7M | 4,604% |
| Total Debt | 19.8B | 574M | 3,449% |
CRH | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 20 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 75 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CRH | TTAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 65% | 9 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 73% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while TTAM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CRH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TTAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTAM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- TTAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CRH (@Construction Materials) experienced а -6.06% price change this week, while TTAM (@Construction Materials) price change was -5.62% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -8.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -12.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.45%.
Reported Earning Dates
CRH is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
TTAM is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Construction Materials (-8.51% weekly)Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.
Advertisement
CRH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRH has been closely correlated with MLM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRH jumps, then MLM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRH | 100% | +1.02% | ||
| MLM - CRH | 75% Closely correlated | +1.49% | ||
| VMC - CRH | 75% Closely correlated | +0.85% | ||
| TTAM - CRH | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.54% | ||
| EXP - CRH | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| AMRZ - CRH | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.20% | ||
More | ||||
TTAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTAM has been closely correlated with EXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TTAM jumps, then EXP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TTAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTAM | 100% | -0.54% | ||
| EXP - TTAM | 69% Closely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| MLM - TTAM | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.49% | ||
| CRH - TTAM | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.02% | ||
| VMC - TTAM | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.85% | ||
| AMRZ - TTAM | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.20% | ||
More | ||||