Advertisement
AMSC vs ZWS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMSC is a Hold and ZWS is a Hold.
| AMSC | ZWS | AMSC / ZWS | |
| Capitalization | 1.32B | 7.65B | 17% |
| EBITDA | 21.6M | 471M | 5% |
| Gain YTD | -5.212 | -0.188 | 2,771% |
| P/E Ratio | 8.86 | 28.63 | 31% |
| Revenue | 321M | 1.79B | 18% |
| Total Cash | 144M | 365M | 39% |
| Total Debt | 3.9M | 550M | 1% |
AMSC | ZWS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 54 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 95 Overvalued | 74 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 73 | 46 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 33 | 52 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 85 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ZWS's Valuation (74) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as AMSC (95) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that ZWS’s stock grew similarly to AMSC’s over the last 12 months.
ZWS's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as AMSC (73) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that ZWS’s stock grew similarly to AMSC’s over the last 12 months.
AMSC's SMR Rating (33) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as ZWS (52) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that AMSC’s stock grew similarly to ZWS’s over the last 12 months.
ZWS's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as AMSC (78) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that ZWS’s stock grew similarly to AMSC’s over the last 12 months.
ZWS's P/E Growth Rating (85) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as AMSC (100) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that ZWS’s stock grew similarly to AMSC’s over the last 12 months.
| AMSC | ZWS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 84% | 12 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 66% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMSC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while ZWS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- AMSC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- ZWS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMSC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZWS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AMSC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- ZWS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
AMSC (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -7.68% price change this week, while ZWS (@Industrial Specialties) price change was -3.19% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -6.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -12.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.68%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Specialties industry was -1.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.13%.
Reported Earning Dates
AMSC is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
ZWS is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Machinery (-6.02% weekly)The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
@Industrial Specialties (-1.44% weekly)Companies in the industrial specialties industry process basic materials and minerals into various specialty products, such as flat and safety glass, fire retardant products, paints and coatings. Examples of companies operating in this industry are Sherwin-Williams Company, PPG Industries, Inc. and RPM International Inc.
Advertisement
AMSC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMSC has been loosely correlated with ZWS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMSC jumps, then ZWS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMSC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMSC | 100% | -7.62% | ||
| ZWS - AMSC | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| NPO - AMSC | 48% Loosely correlated | -5.51% | ||
| ETN - AMSC | 48% Loosely correlated | -7.57% | ||
| NNE - AMSC | 47% Loosely correlated | -3.17% | ||
| GEV - AMSC | 47% Loosely correlated | -8.62% | ||
More | ||||
ZWS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZWS has been closely correlated with XYL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ZWS jumps, then XYL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ZWS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZWS | 100% | -0.19% | ||
| XYL - ZWS | 74% Closely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| LECO - ZWS | 70% Closely correlated | -0.71% | ||
| HLIO - ZWS | 67% Closely correlated | -4.83% | ||
| HLMN - ZWS | 67% Closely correlated | +3.30% | ||
| PNR - ZWS | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.71% | ||
More | ||||