AMT
Price
$166.67
Change
+$2.02 (+1.23%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
77.65B
3 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
O
Price
$65.60
Change
+$0.88 (+1.36%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
61.17B
11 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMT vs O

AMT vs O Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 19, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? American Tower Corporation (AMT) vs. Realty Income Corporation (O) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • American Tower (AMT) is a communications infrastructure REIT benefiting from 5G densification and AI-driven data center demand, with Q2 2025 revenue of $2.63 billion and raised full-year guidance — but significant foreign currency headwinds have pressured GAAP net income.
  • Realty Income (O) is a triple-net-lease REIT focused on recession-resilient retail and industrial properties, with a 5.67% dividend yield paid monthly — a stark contrast to AMT's growth-oriented, infrastructure-driven profile.
  • AMT's CoreSite data center segment grew 13.5% year-over-year, positioning the company squarely within the AI infrastructure mega-trend, while O's business model emphasizes stability and income consistency over rapid expansion.
  • Both stocks operate as REITs (Real Estate Investment Trusts), but their risk profiles differ sharply: AMT faces currency and international churn risk, while O contends with interest rate sensitivity and e-commerce disruption in its retail portfolio.
  • Recent analyst sentiment favors AMT for growth exposure, with multiple firms maintaining Outperform or Strong Buy ratings and price targets up to $260, while O's appeal centers on income reliability for risk-averse investors.

Introduction

Investors navigating the REIT landscape often encounter two fundamentally different value propositions: one anchored in the digital infrastructure revolution, the other in the timeless appeal of predictable monthly income. AMT (American Tower) and O (Realty Income) represent these contrasting philosophies. American Tower owns a global portfolio of cell towers and data centers that form the backbone of wireless connectivity and cloud computing. Realty Income, famously branded as "The Monthly Dividend Company," owns a broad array of single-tenant retail and industrial properties under long-term net leases. This comparison examines how these two REIT heavyweights stack up across performance, strategy, risk, and market sentiment — offering clarity for both growth-seeking and income-focused investors alike.

AMT Overview and Recent Performance

American Tower Corporation is one of the world's largest owners and operators of multitenant communications real estate. Its portfolio spans cell towers, distributed antenna systems, and — through its CoreSite brand — interconnected data center campuses across the United States, Europe, Latin America, Africa, and Asia-Pacific. The core business model involves leasing antenna space to wireless carriers, broadcasters, and government entities under long-term contracts with built-in annual escalators.

In recent weeks, AMT reported second-quarter 2025 results that showcased both its operational resilience and the complexity of its global exposure. Total revenue rose 3.2% year-over-year to $2.63 billion, modestly exceeding consensus estimates. Organic tenant billings growth — a key metric reflecting underlying leasing momentum — reached 4.7%, driven by robust carrier activity in the U.S. and Canada. The data center division proved a standout performer, with property revenue surging 13.5% as enterprises and cloud providers raced to secure AI-ready interconnection capacity. Adjusted EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization) grew 1.8% to $1.75 billion, and management raised full-year guidance for property revenue, Adjusted EBITDA, and AFFO (Adjusted Funds From Operations) per share.

However, the quarter also revealed significant headwinds. GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) net income tumbled 58.1% to $381 million, weighed down by approximately $484 million in foreign currency losses tied to emerging-market exposure, particularly in Latin America. The stock initially declined after the earnings release but has remained within a constructive longer-term uptrend, supported by secular demand themes: 5G network densification, mobile data consumption growth, and the AI infrastructure buildout. Several major Wall Street analysts — including RBC Capital, J.P. Morgan, and Raymond James — have maintained Outperform or Strong Buy ratings, with price targets ranging from $245 to $260. That said, HSBC recently downgraded the stock to Hold, citing a lack of near-term catalysts and marginally lower U.S. organic billings growth guidance. The quarterly dividend was raised 4.9% to $1.70 per share.

O Overview and Recent Performance

Realty Income Corporation is a net-lease REIT that owns a highly diversified portfolio of over 15,000 commercial properties across the United States, the United Kingdom, and continental Europe. Its tenant base spans retail, industrial, gaming, and — increasingly — data center assets, with more than 90% of rental revenue derived from industries considered resilient to economic downturns and e-commerce disruption. The company's signature feature is its monthly dividend, which it has paid for 661 consecutive months and raised 131 times since its founding three decades ago.

In its most recent quarterly report, Realty Income delivered revenue growth of approximately 15% year-over-year, reflecting both organic rent escalations and portfolio expansion through acquisitions. Net income rose meaningfully, supported by effective cost management and a stable tenant base. The company declared its 109th dividend increase in recent months, raising the monthly payout to $0.2555 per share — translating to an annualized yield of roughly 5.67%, substantially above the broader REIT average. The dividend payout ratio remains prudent at under 75%, and the balance sheet carries a manageable leverage ratio of 5.4x, among the strongest in the net-lease sector.

Realty Income continues to grow through strategic acquisitions, including a recent $100 million portfolio purchase spanning retail and industrial properties across key markets. The company's beta of approximately 0.73 underscores its historically low correlation with broader equity market swings, making it a favored holding for income-oriented portfolios. However, its trailing P/E (Price-to-Earnings) ratio of approximately 53x suggests a premium valuation that reflects its reputation for reliability rather than explosive growth. Analyst sentiment skews heavily toward Neutral ratings, with few Strong Buy recommendations — indicating that the market views O as a steady compounder rather than a momentum-driven opportunity.

Trending AI Robots

In an increasingly data-driven market environment, AI-powered trading tools are reshaping how investors identify opportunities and manage risk. Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates the platform's top-performing automated strategies from among hundreds of available AI trading bots — each designed to trade thousands of different tickers using distinct trading styles, timeframes (from 5-minute to daily), and risk parameters. Only the bots best suited for current market conditions earn placement in this section. Performance metrics vary widely: some bots have posted annualized returns exceeding 80% with win rates above 70%, while more conservative strategies emphasize consistency and capital preservation. Each robot is powered by Tickeron's proprietary Financial Learning Models (FLMs) — adaptive AI engines that continuously learn from price action, volume patterns, and market microstructure data. Whether targeting momentum in infrastructure names or capturing dip-buying setups across liquid ETFs, these AI systems eliminate emotional bias and enforce disciplined risk management through automated stop-loss and take-profit corridors. Explore the full lineup of Trending AI Robots to see which strategies are currently leading the pack.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The contrast between AMT and O begins with their core business models. American Tower is a communications infrastructure REIT whose revenue depends on the relentless growth of mobile data traffic and the physical buildout of 5G and AI infrastructure. Realty Income is a triple-net-lease REIT whose tenants — from dollar stores and pharmacies to distribution centers — pay not only rent but also property taxes, insurance, and maintenance costs. This structural difference means AMT carries higher operational complexity but also greater exposure to secular growth trends, while O offers a simpler, more predictable income stream.

On the growth front, AMT holds a clear advantage. Its CoreSite data center segment is growing at double-digit rates, fueled by hyperscale cloud demand and AI training workloads. Organic tenant billings growth across the tower portfolio remains in the mid-single digits, and management has raised full-year 2025 guidance for key operating metrics. Realty Income's growth, by comparison, relies more heavily on acquisition activity and modest rent escalators — steady but unlikely to accelerate dramatically.

From a risk standpoint, the two stocks diverge meaningfully. AMT faces significant foreign currency exposure, with recent losses totaling hundreds of millions of dollars from operations in Latin America and other emerging markets. Customer churn in international markets also represents an ongoing headwind. O's primary risks are interest rate sensitivity — REITs tend to underperform when rates rise — and the slow-moving but persistent threat of e-commerce to certain retail tenant categories. However, O's tenant diversification and recession-resistant sector focus mitigate some of this exposure.

Market sentiment reflects these trade-offs. Wall Street analysts maintain a notably bullish posture on AMT, with multiple firms assigning Outperform or Strong Buy ratings and price targets implying double-digit upside from recent levels. O's analyst consensus is overwhelmingly Neutral, suggesting the market already prices in much of its stability premium. Income investors may find O's 5.67% monthly yield compelling, while growth-oriented investors may gravitate toward AMT's infrastructure-driven total return potential.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, momentum characteristics, and sector-level catalysts, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely favor AMT in the current market environment. Several probabilistic factors support this assessment: AMT's organic tenant billings growth remains in a confirmed uptrend, its data center segment is directly aligned with the AI infrastructure capital expenditure cycle, and management has demonstrated confidence by raising full-year guidance across multiple core metrics. While foreign currency headwinds introduce noise, the underlying operational trajectory — particularly in the U.S. and Europe — shows greater directional conviction than O's acquisition-dependent growth model. Realty Income's strengths in stability and income should not be discounted, and in a risk-off environment its low-beta profile could prove advantageous. Yet in terms of trend quality, growth catalyst density, and relative momentum, AMT currently presents the more compelling signal profile for AI-driven strategies focused on trend following and sector strength. This assessment is probabilistic in nature, reflecting relative positioning rather than an absolute prediction of future returns.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
AMT vs. O commentary
Jul 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMT is a Hold and O is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 25, 2026
Stock price -- (AMT: $166.67 vs. O: $65.60)
Brand notoriety: AMT: Notable vs. O: Not notable
AMT represents the Specialty Telecommunications, while O is part of the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMT: 104% vs. O: 61%
Market capitalization -- AMT: $77.65B vs. O: $61.17B
AMT [@Specialty Telecommunications] is valued at $77.65B. O’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $61.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Telecommunications] industry ranges from $106.93B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Telecommunications] industry is $22.16B. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $9.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AMT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • O’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, O is a better buy in the long-term than AMT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while O’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • O’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, O is a better buy in the short-term than AMT.

Price Growth

AMT (@Specialty Telecommunications) experienced а -1.99% price change this week, while O (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -0.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Telecommunications industry was +1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.41%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -2.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMT is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.

O is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Telecommunications (+1.58% weekly)

Companies belonging to the specialty telecommunications sector provide voice and data transmission via a single method, such as fixed lines, digital subscriber lines (DSL), wireless technology, the internet or competitive local exchange carriers. Telefonica, Liberty Broadband Corp., and Zayo Group Holdings, Inc. are some of the big specialty telecom companies in the U.S.

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-2.06% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMT($77.7B) has a higher market cap than O($61.2B). O has higher P/E ratio than AMT: O (53.77) vs AMT (26.88). O YTD gains are higher at: 19.431 vs. AMT (-3.205). AMT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.89B vs. O (4.91B). O has less debt than AMT: O (30.2B) vs AMT (45.1B). AMT has higher revenues than O: AMT (10.8B) vs O (5.88B).
AMTOAMT / O
Capitalization77.7B61.2B127%
EBITDA6.89B4.91B140%
Gain YTD-3.20519.431-16%
P/E Ratio26.8853.7750%
Revenue10.8B5.88B184%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt45.1B30.2B149%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMT vs O: Fundamental Ratings
AMT
O
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5872
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10061
SMR RATING
1..100
1489
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6131
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8046
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AMT's Valuation (33) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as O (60). This means that AMT’s stock grew similarly to O’s over the last 12 months.

O's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMT (100). This means that O’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMT’s over the last 12 months.

AMT's SMR Rating (14) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for O (89). This means that AMT’s stock grew significantly faster than O’s over the last 12 months.

O's Price Growth Rating (31) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as AMT (61). This means that O’s stock grew similarly to AMT’s over the last 12 months.

O's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMT (80). This means that O’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMTO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
47%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
O
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSGM4.570.39
+9.33%
Motorsport Games
VZLA3.300.06
+1.85%
Vizsla Silver Corp
NOC542.248.76
+1.64%
Northrop Grumman Corp
TVTX57.360.68
+1.20%
Travere Therapeutics
SIGA3.11-0.04
-1.27%
SIGA Technologies

AMT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMT has been closely correlated with CCI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMT jumps, then CCI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMT
1D Price
Change %
AMT100%
+1.23%
CCI - AMT
82%
Closely correlated
+0.44%
SBAC - AMT
66%
Closely correlated
-0.73%
ADC - AMT
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.03%
O - AMT
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
NNN - AMT
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.52%
More