Investors seeking income-producing real estate exposure often find themselves comparing REITs across vastly different property sectors. AMT — American Tower Corporation — owns and operates a global portfolio of over 150,000 wireless communication sites and a growing data center business. NNN — NNN REIT, Inc. — focuses exclusively on freestanding, single-tenant retail properties leased under long-term net-lease agreements across all 50 U.S. states. Though both are REITs, their business drivers, growth levers, and risk factors diverge sharply. This comparison examines how these two stocks stack up in the current market environment, helping income-oriented and total-return-focused investors understand the trade-offs between telecom infrastructure and retail net-lease real estate.
American Tower Corporation is one of the largest publicly traded REITs globally, with a market capitalization near $79 billion. The company's core business involves leasing space on multitenant communications towers to wireless carriers, broadcasters, and government entities. Through its CoreSite subsidiary, AMT also operates an interconnection-focused data center platform that has become increasingly relevant as AI-related workloads and hybrid-cloud deployments accelerate.
Full-year 2025 results underscored the durability of AMT's business model. Total revenue rose 5.1% to $10.65 billion, while AFFO attributable to common stockholders — a key REIT earnings metric — grew 8% on an as-adjusted basis to $10.76 per share. In the data center segment, revenue expanded approximately 14%, driven by strong leasing demand and favorable pricing. Organic tenant billings growth reached 5.1% for the full year, reflecting sustained carrier investment in 5G network capacity and coverage.
In recent months, however, sentiment has been tempered by a notable customer event. DISH Network, which accounted for roughly 2% of consolidated property revenue, defaulted on its lease payment obligations. Management has removed 100% of DISH-related revenue from its 2026 organic growth baseline, and the company is pursuing legal remedies to recover value. This headwind, combined with elevated churn in Latin America — particularly consolidation-related churn in Brazil — has resulted in cautious 2026 guidance. AFFO per share is projected at $10.78 to $10.95, implying approximately 1% growth at the midpoint. The stock has reflected these concerns, recently trading near the lower end of its 52-week range.
NNN REIT, Inc. is a specialized net-lease REIT that owns approximately 3,692 single-tenant retail properties across more than 35 lines of trade, spanning all 50 states. The company's straightforward investment strategy centers on acquiring freestanding properties under long-term, triple-net leases — agreements where the tenant bears most operating costs including taxes, insurance, and maintenance. This model produces relatively predictable cash flows and has supported an extraordinary 36-year streak of consecutive annual dividend increases.
NNN's 2025 results reflected operational momentum and disciplined capital deployment. The company completed a record $931 million in property acquisitions at an initial cash capitalization rate of 7.4%, with a weighted average remaining lease term of 17.6 years. Annual base rent (ABR) climbed 7.8% to $928 million. AFFO per share reached $3.44, representing 2.7% year-over-year growth. By year-end, portfolio occupancy had recovered to 98.3%, up 80 basis points from the prior quarter, as the company worked through vacancy situations involving a furniture tenant and a restaurant operator.
Management introduced 2026 AFFO guidance of $3.52 to $3.58 per share, implying approximately 3.2% growth at the midpoint. The company expects acquisition volumes to moderate to roughly $600 million in 2026, funded primarily through free cash flow, dispositions, and leverage-neutral debt financing. NNN's balance sheet remains among the strongest in the net-lease sector, with a weighted average debt maturity of 10.8 years, no floating-rate debt, and $1.2 billion of total liquidity. The quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share offers an annualized yield approaching 6%.
For investors who prefer a data-driven, automated approach to navigating markets, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed for current market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI Trading Bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, but only the top performers — those demonstrating the strongest statistical alignment with today's market environment — earn a place in this featured section. These bots span a wide range of trading styles, from short-term swing trading to longer-term trend-following strategies, and each bot comes with transparent performance metrics, historical track records, and detailed statistics. Some bots have delivered consistently high win rates, while others emphasize risk-adjusted returns or specialize in specific sectors. Exploring Tickeron's Trending AI Robots can provide a quantitative complement to traditional fundamental analysis for those evaluating stocks like AMT and NNN.
The most fundamental contrast between AMT and NNN lies in their growth drivers. AMT is tethered to secular technology trends — rising mobile data consumption, 5G network densification, and surging demand for AI-ready data center capacity. These forces provide a structural tailwind that should persist for years, but they also expose AMT to customer concentration risk (major wireless carriers represent a large share of revenue) and geopolitical complexities in international markets. NNN, by contrast, grows primarily through disciplined acquisition activity. Its 7.4% acquisition cap rates in 2025 compare favorably to its cost of capital, creating an accretive spread, but organic growth is inherently modest — escalators and lease renewals generate low-single-digit internal growth rather than the higher-octane expansion AMT has historically delivered.
On the income front, NNN holds a clear advantage. Its dividend yield of roughly 6% substantially exceeds AMT's ~4.1% yield. NNN's 36-year dividend growth record also provides a level of income reliability that few REITs can match. AMT's dividend, while growing (up approximately 5% annually), represents a smaller component of total return and consumes a lower payout ratio.
Risk profiles diverge meaningfully. AMT's near-term risk centers on customer credit — the DISH default and ongoing arbitration with AT&T Mexico create earnings visibility challenges. Currency exposure across 16 international markets adds another layer of volatility. NNN faces retail-sector risks including tenant bankruptcies and e-commerce disruption, though its net-lease structure and granular tenant diversification (over 400 tenants, no single tenant exceeding 5% of ABR) mitigate these concerns. NNN's occupancy, while historically strong, can dip during tenant transitions, as seen in 2025 when it temporarily fell to 97.5% before recovering.
From a valuation standpoint, AMT trades at a higher multiple of AFFO, reflecting its larger growth opportunity set and data center optionality. NNN trades at a more moderate valuation, consistent with its slower-growth, income-oriented profile. AMT's market capitalization of $79 billion provides deep liquidity and broad institutional coverage; NNN operates at a smaller scale that may appeal to investors seeking less crowded positioning.
Based on observable market patterns and fundamental positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely exhibit a nuanced preference between these two REITs. NNN appears to offer greater trend consistency in the current environment — its steady occupancy recovery, record acquisition momentum, 36-year dividend growth streak, and clearer earnings trajectory for 2026 suggest a more stable near-term path. The company's self-funding acquisition model and conservative balance sheet reduce dependence on external capital markets. AMT, while benefiting from powerful secular tailwinds in mobile data and AI infrastructure, faces several transitional headwinds — the DISH default resolution, Latin American churn, and foreign currency volatility — that introduce uncertainty into the immediate outlook. Over a multi-year horizon, AMT's exposure to digital infrastructure growth arguably provides superior total-return potential, but in the context of current market conditions where visibility and stability command a premium, NNN's lower-volatility profile and dependable income stream may be more probabilistically favored by AI-driven trend and stability metrics. This assessment is based on observable factors and does not constitute investment advice.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNNN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NNN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
AMT (@Specialty Telecommunications) experienced а -1.99% price change this week, while NNN (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -0.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Telecommunications industry was +1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.41%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -2.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.10%.
AMT is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
NNN is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Companies belonging to the specialty telecommunications sector provide voice and data transmission via a single method, such as fixed lines, digital subscriber lines (DSL), wireless technology, the internet or competitive local exchange carriers. Telefonica, Liberty Broadband Corp., and Zayo Group Holdings, Inc. are some of the big specialty telecom companies in the U.S.
@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-2.06% weekly)A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.
| AMT | NNN | AMT / NNN | |
| Capitalization | 77.7B | 9.39B | 827% |
| EBITDA | 6.89B | 871M | 791% |
| Gain YTD | -3.205 | 28.184 | -11% |
| P/E Ratio | 26.88 | 24.09 | 112% |
| Revenue | 10.8B | 936M | 1,154% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 4.57M | - |
| Total Debt | 45.1B | 4.85B | 929% |
AMT | NNN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 33 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 33 Fair valued | 50 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 40 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 14 | 76 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 32 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AMT's Valuation (33) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as NNN (50). This means that AMT’s stock grew similarly to NNN’s over the last 12 months.
NNN's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMT (100). This means that NNN’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMT’s over the last 12 months.
AMT's SMR Rating (14) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NNN (76). This means that AMT’s stock grew somewhat faster than NNN’s over the last 12 months.
NNN's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as AMT (61). This means that NNN’s stock grew similarly to AMT’s over the last 12 months.
NNN's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMT (80). This means that NNN’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMT’s over the last 12 months.
| AMT | NNN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 44% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 39% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 51% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 47% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 43% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 58% | 9 days ago 46% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 49% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 41% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 39% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMT has been closely correlated with CCI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMT jumps, then CCI could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NNN has been closely correlated with O. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NNN jumps, then O could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NNN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NNN | 100% | +1.52% | ||
| O - NNN | 79% Closely correlated | +1.36% | ||
| ADC - NNN | 74% Closely correlated | +1.03% | ||
| EPRT - NNN | 70% Closely correlated | +0.75% | ||
| FCPT - NNN | 70% Closely correlated | +0.85% | ||
| EPR - NNN | 66% Closely correlated | +2.50% | ||
More | ||||