It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AN’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTTSH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AN’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTSH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
AN (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +5.46% price change this week, while TTSH (@Specialty Stores) price change was +1.90% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.10%.
AN is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.
TTSH is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.
The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
AN | TTSH | AN / TTSH | |
Capitalization | 6.9B | 311M | 2,219% |
EBITDA | 1.9B | 37.4M | 5,072% |
Gain YTD | 11.892 | -5.163 | -230% |
P/E Ratio | 7.25 | 30.39 | 24% |
Revenue | 26.9B | 377M | 7,135% |
Total Cash | 60.8M | 8.62M | 705% |
Total Debt | 8.03B | 140M | 5,739% |
AN | TTSH | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 70 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 42 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 30 | 82 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 19 | 7 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TTSH's Valuation (70) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is in the same range as AN (92) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that TTSH’s stock grew similarly to AN’s over the last 12 months.
AN's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as TTSH (42) in the Home Improvement Chains industry. This means that AN’s stock grew similarly to TTSH’s over the last 12 months.
AN's SMR Rating (30) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TTSH (82) in the Home Improvement Chains industry. This means that AN’s stock grew somewhat faster than TTSH’s over the last 12 months.
TTSH's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is in the same range as AN (54) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that TTSH’s stock grew similarly to AN’s over the last 12 months.
TTSH's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is in the same range as AN (19) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that TTSH’s stock grew similarly to AN’s over the last 12 months.
AN | TTSH | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago83% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago86% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago80% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago80% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago79% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago72% | 7 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago66% | 19 days ago77% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago85% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago76% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AN has been closely correlated with PAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AN jumps, then PAG could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTSH has been loosely correlated with ABG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TTSH jumps, then ABG could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TTSH | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TTSH | 100% | -0.29% | ||
ABG - TTSH | 48% Loosely correlated | +2.03% | ||
RUSHB - TTSH | 46% Loosely correlated | +3.78% | ||
AN - TTSH | 45% Loosely correlated | +2.22% | ||
PAG - TTSH | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.23% | ||
HVT - TTSH | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.96% | ||
More |