ANCTF
Price
$49.81
Change
-$0.05 (-0.10%)
Updated
Nov 18 closing price
Capitalization
46.53B
5 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PAG
Price
$157.25
Change
+$0.80 (+0.51%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.3B
84 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ANCTF vs PAG

Header iconANCTF vs PAG Comparison
Open Charts ANCTF vs PAGBanner chart's image
Alimentation Couche-Tard
Price$49.81
Change-$0.05 (-0.10%)
Volume$358.89K
Capitalization46.53B
Penske Automotive Group
Price$157.25
Change+$0.80 (+0.51%)
Volume$900
Capitalization10.3B
ANCTF vs PAG Comparison Chart in %
ANCTF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PAG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ANCTF vs. PAG commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANCTF is a Hold and PAG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (ANCTF: $49.81 vs. PAG: $156.45)
Brand notoriety: ANCTF and PAG are both not notable
ANCTF represents the Specialty Stores, while PAG is part of the Automotive Aftermarket industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ANCTF: 102% vs. PAG: 83%
Market capitalization -- ANCTF: $46.52B vs. PAG: $10.35B
ANCTF [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $46.52B. PAG’s [@Automotive Aftermarket] market capitalization is $10.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $46.52B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $46.63B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $3.82B. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $3.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ANCTF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ANCTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PAG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAG is a better buy in the long-term than ANCTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ANCTF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ANCTF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PAG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAG is a better buy in the short-term than ANCTF.

Price Growth

ANCTF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -0.88% price change this week, while PAG (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was -0.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -3.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.17%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -4.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

ANCTF is expected to report earnings on Nov 24, 2025.

PAG is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-3.94% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

@Automotive Aftermarket (-4.34% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANCTF($46.5B) has a higher market cap than PAG($10.3B). ANCTF has higher P/E ratio than PAG: ANCTF (18.45) vs PAG (11.02). PAG YTD gains are higher at: 5.883 vs. ANCTF (-10.383). ANCTF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.16B vs. PAG (1.71B). ANCTF has more cash in the bank: 2.23B vs. PAG (80.3M). PAG has less debt than ANCTF: PAG (7.93B) vs ANCTF (15.2B). ANCTF has higher revenues than PAG: ANCTF (71.9B) vs PAG (30.7B).
ANCTFPAGANCTF / PAG
Capitalization46.5B10.3B451%
EBITDA6.16B1.71B360%
Gain YTD-10.3835.883-177%
P/E Ratio18.4511.02167%
Revenue71.9B30.7B234%
Total Cash2.23B80.3M2,782%
Total Debt15.2B7.93B192%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ANCTF vs PAG: Fundamental Ratings
ANCTF
PAG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
24
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
469
SMR RATING
1..100
4949
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6162
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4854
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAG's Valuation (31) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ANCTF (81) in the null industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew somewhat faster than ANCTF’s over the last 12 months.

PAG's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ANCTF (46) in the null industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew somewhat faster than ANCTF’s over the last 12 months.

PAG's SMR Rating (49) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as ANCTF (49) in the null industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to ANCTF’s over the last 12 months.

ANCTF's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as PAG (62) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that ANCTF’s stock grew similarly to PAG’s over the last 12 months.

ANCTF's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as PAG (54) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that ANCTF’s stock grew similarly to PAG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ANCTFPAG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ANCTF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PAG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NULC50.97-0.29
-0.57%
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF
OAIM39.59-0.25
-0.63%
OneAscent International Equity ETF
ETW8.82-0.09
-1.01%
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund
TEMX29.09-0.58
-1.94%
Touchstone Sands Cap EM ex-China Gr ETF
QQUP56.53-1.50
-2.59%
ProShares Ultra Top QQQ

ANCTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ANCTF and WFAFY have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ANCTF and WFAFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ANCTF
1D Price
Change %
ANCTF100%
-0.10%
WFAFY - ANCTF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
FLWS - ANCTF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.25%
CASY - ANCTF
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.23%
WOOF - ANCTF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.78%
PAG - ANCTF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
More

PAG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAG has been closely correlated with GPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAG jumps, then GPI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAG
1D Price
Change %
PAG100%
+0.45%
GPI - PAG
85%
Closely correlated
+2.58%
AN - PAG
80%
Closely correlated
+2.44%
SAH - PAG
78%
Closely correlated
+0.82%
ABG - PAG
78%
Closely correlated
+1.62%
LAD - PAG
71%
Closely correlated
+3.07%
More