APPF
Price
$179.90
Change
+$4.32 (+2.46%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
6.36B
9 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
BL
Price
$30.09
Change
+$0.96 (+3.30%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.77B
28 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

APPF vs BL

APPF vs BL Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APPF vs. BL commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APPF is a StrongBuy and BL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (APPF: $179.90 vs. BL: $30.09)
Brand notoriety: APPF and BL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APPF: 37% vs. BL: 42%
Market capitalization -- APPF: $6.36B vs. BL: $1.77B
APPF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $6.36B. BL’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $1.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $195.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • APPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, APPF is a better buy in the long-term than BL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APPF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BL’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • BL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BL is a better buy in the short-term than APPF.

Price Growth

APPF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +2.18% price change this week, while BL (@Packaged Software) price change was +3.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

APPF is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

BL is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-2.53% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
APPF($6.36B) has a higher market cap than BL($1.77B). BL has higher P/E ratio than APPF: BL (71.64) vs APPF (42.85). APPF YTD gains are higher at: -22.674 vs. BL (-45.578). APPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 194M vs. BL (105M). BL has more cash in the bank: 525M vs. APPF (152M). APPF has less debt than BL: APPF (37M) vs BL (687M). APPF has higher revenues than BL: APPF (995M) vs BL (717M).
APPFBLAPPF / BL
Capitalization6.36B1.77B361%
EBITDA194M105M185%
Gain YTD-22.674-45.57850%
P/E Ratio42.8571.6460%
Revenue995M717M139%
Total Cash152M525M29%
Total Debt37M687M5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APPF vs BL: Fundamental Ratings
APPF
BL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2013
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
85100
SMR RATING
1..100
3180
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5764
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5711
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

APPF's Valuation (72) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as BL (88) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that APPF’s stock grew similarly to BL’s over the last 12 months.

APPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (85) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as BL (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that APPF’s stock grew similarly to BL’s over the last 12 months.

APPF's SMR Rating (31) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BL (80) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that APPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BL’s over the last 12 months.

APPF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as BL (64) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that APPF’s stock grew similarly to BL’s over the last 12 months.

BL's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APPF (57) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that BL’s stock grew somewhat faster than APPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APPFBL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JUNZ35.32N/A
N/A
TrueShares Structured Outcome June ETF
PCFI22.56N/A
N/A
POLEN FLOATING RATE INCOME ETF
AIMS28.49N/A
N/A
Acuitas Small Cap Active ETF
BMAY47.47-0.27
-0.57%
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF™- May
LRGC84.60-0.52
-0.61%
AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

BL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BL has been closely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BL jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BL
1D Price
Change %
BL100%
+3.30%
FRSH - BL
67%
Closely correlated
+4.54%
CXM - BL
66%
Loosely correlated
+4.56%
WDAY - BL
65%
Loosely correlated
+4.26%
ASAN - BL
64%
Loosely correlated
+4.91%
INTA - BL
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.75%
More