BL
Price
$30.09
Change
+$0.96 (+3.30%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
1.77B
29 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FRSH
Price
$10.83
Change
+$0.47 (+4.54%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.99B
21 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BL vs FRSH

BL vs FRSH Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BL vs. FRSH commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BL is a Hold and FRSH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (BL: $29.13 vs. FRSH: $10.83)
Brand notoriety: BL and FRSH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BL: 33% vs. FRSH: 57%
Market capitalization -- BL: $1.77B vs. FRSH: $2.99B
BL [@Packaged Software] is valued at $1.77B. FRSH’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $2.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $195.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFRSH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FRSH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRSH is a better buy in the long-term than BL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRSH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FRSH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BL is a better buy in the short-term than FRSH.

Price Growth

BL (@Packaged Software) experienced а -2.51% price change this week, while FRSH (@Packaged Software) price change was +6.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +7.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

BL is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

FRSH is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+7.10% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRSH($2.99B) has a higher market cap than BL($1.77B). BL has higher P/E ratio than FRSH: BL (71.64) vs FRSH (17.63). FRSH YTD gains are higher at: -11.592 vs. BL (-45.578). BL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 105M vs. FRSH (42.9M). FRSH has more cash in the bank: 779M vs. BL (525M). FRSH has less debt than BL: FRSH (38.8M) vs BL (687M). FRSH has higher revenues than BL: FRSH (871M) vs BL (717M).
BLFRSHBL / FRSH
Capitalization1.77B2.99B59%
EBITDA105M42.9M245%
Gain YTD-45.578-11.592393%
P/E Ratio71.6417.63406%
Revenue717M871M82%
Total Cash525M779M67%
Total Debt687M38.8M1,771%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BL vs FRSH: Fundamental Ratings
BL
FRSH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10091
SMR RATING
1..100
8051
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6448
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1220
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRSH's Valuation (60) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as BL (88) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to BL’s over the last 12 months.

FRSH's Profit vs Risk Rating (91) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as BL (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to BL’s over the last 12 months.

FRSH's SMR Rating (51) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as BL (80) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to BL’s over the last 12 months.

FRSH's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as BL (64) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to BL’s over the last 12 months.

BL's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as FRSH (20) in the Restaurants industry. This means that BL’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLFRSH
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FRSH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PWRD115.18N/A
N/A
TCW Transform Systems ETF
PJP117.60-0.95
-0.80%
Invesco Pharmaceuticals ETF
TRND36.52-0.32
-0.88%
Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF
DIVI42.49-0.40
-0.93%
Franklin Intl Core Div Tlt Idx ETF
TEMT22.37-2.02
-8.30%
Tradr 2X Long TEM Daily ETF

BL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BL has been closely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BL jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BL
1D Price
Change %
BL100%
+3.30%
FRSH - BL
67%
Closely correlated
+4.54%
CXM - BL
66%
Loosely correlated
+4.56%
WDAY - BL
65%
Loosely correlated
+4.26%
ASAN - BL
64%
Loosely correlated
+4.91%
INTA - BL
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.75%
More