BL
Price
$28.74
Change
+$1.30 (+4.74%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.69B
16 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CXM
Price
$5.69
Change
+$0.19 (+3.45%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.33B
45 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BL vs CXM

BL vs CXM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BL vs. CXM commentary
Jul 26, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BL is a Hold and CXM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2026
Stock price -- (BL: $28.74 vs. CXM: $5.69)
Brand notoriety: BL and CXM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BL: 50% vs. CXM: 61%
Market capitalization -- BL: $1.69B vs. CXM: $1.33B
BL [@Packaged Software] is valued at $1.69B. CXM’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $1.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $473.06B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $10.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCXM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CXM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BL and CXM are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CXM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CXM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BL is a better buy in the short-term than CXM.

Price Growth

BL (@Packaged Software) experienced а -5.12% price change this week, while CXM (@Packaged Software) price change was -2.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -4.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

BL is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

CXM is expected to report earnings on Sep 09, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-4.81% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BL($1.69B) has a higher market cap than CXM($1.33B). BL has higher P/E ratio than CXM: BL (68.43) vs CXM (47.42). CXM YTD gains are higher at: -26.864 vs. BL (-48.020). BL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 105M vs. CXM (71.1M). BL has more cash in the bank: 525M vs. CXM (443M). CXM has less debt than BL: CXM (43.8M) vs BL (687M). CXM has higher revenues than BL: CXM (871M) vs BL (717M).
BLCXMBL / CXM
Capitalization1.69B1.33B126%
EBITDA105M71.1M148%
Gain YTD-48.020-26.864179%
P/E Ratio68.4347.42144%
Revenue717M871M82%
Total Cash525M443M119%
Total Debt687M43.8M1,568%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BL: Fundamental Ratings
BL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
80
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
14
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BLCXM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CXM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PXIIX24.210.12
+0.50%
Virtus KAR Equity Income I
EIS119.570.28
+0.23%
iShares MSCI Israel ETF
TIERX9.020.02
+0.22%
Nuveen International Eq A
TAMMX37.280.05
+0.13%
Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced R6
PAGHX137.39-0.97
-0.70%
Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth C

CXM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CXM has been closely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CXM jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CXM
1D Price
Change %
CXM100%
+3.45%
FRSH - CXM
69%
Closely correlated
+5.12%
BL - CXM
68%
Closely correlated
+4.74%
SPT - CXM
66%
Loosely correlated
+3.42%
DOCU - CXM
65%
Loosely correlated
+7.23%
CRM - CXM
64%
Loosely correlated
+4.29%
More