ARES
Price
$191.32
Change
+$3.42 (+1.82%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
25.71B
16 days until earnings call
FNNCF
Price
$6.65
Change
+$0.48 (+7.78%)
Updated
Jan 16 closing price
Capitalization
270.04M
Ad is loading...

ARES vs FNNCF

Header iconARES vs FNNCF Comparison
Open Charts ARES vs FNNCFBanner chart's image
Ares Management
Price$191.32
Change+$3.42 (+1.82%)
Volume$721.77K
Capitalization25.71B
Financial 15 Split
Price$6.65
Change+$0.48 (+7.78%)
Volume$200
Capitalization270.04M
ARES vs FNNCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ARES
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNNCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ARES vs. FNNCF commentary
Jan 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARES is a Hold and FNNCF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 20, 2025
Stock price -- (ARES: $191.32 vs. FNNCF: $6.65)
Brand notoriety: ARES and FNNCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ARES: 69% vs. FNNCF: 55%
Market capitalization -- ARES: $25.71B vs. FNNCF: $270.04M
ARES [@Investment Managers] is valued at $25.71B. FNNCF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $270.04M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ARES’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFNNCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ARES’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FNNCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ARES is a better buy in the long-term than FNNCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ARES’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNNCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ARES’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • FNNCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ARES is a better buy in the short-term than FNNCF.

Price Growth

ARES (@Investment Managers) experienced а +9.30% price change this week, while FNNCF (@Investment Managers) price change was +2.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

ARES is expected to report earnings on Apr 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.49% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ARES($25.7B) has a higher market cap than FNNCF($270M). ARES YTD gains are higher at: 8.072 vs. FNNCF (3.520). ARES has higher revenues than FNNCF: ARES (4.99B) vs FNNCF (-2.58M).
ARESFNNCFARES / FNNCF
Capitalization25.7B270M9,519%
EBITDA2.43BN/A-
Gain YTD8.0723.520229%
P/E Ratio54.71N/A-
Revenue4.99B-2.58M-193,298%
Total Cash1.5BN/A-
Total Debt15.8BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ARES vs FNNCF: Fundamental Ratings
ARES
FNNCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2100
SMR RATING
1..100
5223
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3946
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2240
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNNCF's Valuation (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ARES (35) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FNNCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ARES’s over the last 12 months.

ARES's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for FNNCF (100) in the null industry. This means that ARES’s stock grew significantly faster than FNNCF’s over the last 12 months.

FNNCF's SMR Rating (23) in the null industry is in the same range as ARES (52) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FNNCF’s stock grew similarly to ARES’s over the last 12 months.

ARES's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as FNNCF (46) in the null industry. This means that ARES’s stock grew similarly to FNNCF’s over the last 12 months.

ARES's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as FNNCF (40) in the null industry. This means that ARES’s stock grew similarly to FNNCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ARESFNNCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
42%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
39%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
77%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
58%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ARES
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNNCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AMPY5.860.01
+0.17%
Amplify Energy Corp
BXC106.72-0.24
-0.22%
BlueLinx Holdings
POR41.82-0.12
-0.29%
Portland General Electric Company
CGTX0.68-0.01
-1.80%
Cognition Therapeutics
FICO1900.54-69.14
-3.51%
Fair Isaac Corp

FNNCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNNCF and TPG have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNNCF and TPG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNNCF
1D Price
Change %
FNNCF100%
N/A
TPG - FNNCF
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.34%
PAX - FNNCF
31%
Poorly correlated
+4.95%
CG - FNNCF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.79%
CYMBF - FNNCF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARES - FNNCF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.82%
More