ARES
Price
$177.96
Change
-$0.02 (-0.01%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
25.71B
26 days until earnings call
FNNCF
Price
$7.12
Change
+$0.12 (+1.71%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
270.04M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ARES vs FNNCF

Header iconARES vs FNNCF Comparison
Open Charts ARES vs FNNCFBanner chart's image
Ares Management
Price$177.96
Change-$0.02 (-0.01%)
Volume$684.37K
Capitalization25.71B
Financial 15 Split
Price$7.12
Change+$0.12 (+1.71%)
Volume$300
Capitalization270.04M
ARES vs FNNCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ARES
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNNCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ARES vs. FNNCF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARES is a StrongBuy and FNNCF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (ARES: $177.96 vs. FNNCF: $7.12)
Brand notoriety: ARES and FNNCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ARES: 43% vs. FNNCF: 87%
Market capitalization -- ARES: $25.71B vs. FNNCF: $270.04M
ARES [@Investment Managers] is valued at $25.71B. FNNCF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $270.04M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ARES’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFNNCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ARES’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FNNCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ARES is a better buy in the long-term than FNNCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ARES’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNNCF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ARES’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FNNCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ARES is a better buy in the short-term than FNNCF.

Price Growth

ARES (@Investment Managers) experienced а +4.00% price change this week, while FNNCF (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

ARES is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

FNNCF is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ARES($25.7B) has a higher market cap than FNNCF($270M). FNNCF YTD gains are higher at: 10.942 vs. ARES (1.997). ARES has higher revenues than FNNCF: ARES (4.99B) vs FNNCF (-2.58M).
ARESFNNCFARES / FNNCF
Capitalization25.7B270M9,519%
EBITDA2.43BN/A-
Gain YTD1.99710.94218%
P/E Ratio54.71N/A-
Revenue4.99B-2.58M-193,298%
Total Cash1.5BN/A-
Total Debt15.8BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ARES vs FNNCF: Fundamental Ratings
ARES
FNNCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
21100
SMR RATING
1..100
9323
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4244
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1393
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNNCF's Valuation (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ARES (37) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FNNCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ARES’s over the last 12 months.

ARES's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for FNNCF (100) in the null industry. This means that ARES’s stock grew significantly faster than FNNCF’s over the last 12 months.

FNNCF's SMR Rating (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ARES (93) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FNNCF’s stock grew significantly faster than ARES’s over the last 12 months.

ARES's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as FNNCF (44) in the null industry. This means that ARES’s stock grew similarly to FNNCF’s over the last 12 months.

ARES's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for FNNCF (93) in the null industry. This means that ARES’s stock grew significantly faster than FNNCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ARESFNNCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
34%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
27%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
59%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ARES
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNNCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
COWG35.450.43
+1.23%
Pacer US Large Cp CA Cows Gr Ldrs ETF
NUMV36.770.09
+0.26%
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF
RSPR35.440.09
+0.25%
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Wt Real Estt ETF
CAAA20.42N/A
N/A
First Trust Commercial Mortg Opports ETF
NBTR50.35N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Total Return Bond ETF

FNNCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNNCF and TPG have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNNCF and TPG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNNCF
1D Price
Change %
FNNCF100%
+1.75%
TPG - FNNCF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
PAX - FNNCF
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.33%
CG - FNNCF
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.30%
CYMBF - FNNCF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARES - FNNCF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.01%
More