Ares Management (ARES) and KKR & Co. (KKR) represent prominent players in the alternative asset management sector, where institutional and sophisticated retail investors seek exposure to private markets, credit strategies, and real assets. This comparison examines their business models, recent market behavior, and positioning within a dynamic environment influenced by interest rates, deal flow, and capital raising trends. Traders monitoring relative performance and investors evaluating long-term holdings in financial services may find the analysis useful for understanding trade-offs between specialized credit focus and diversified platforms. The discussion draws on verifiable developments from recent market activity to highlight observable contrasts without forward-looking speculation.
Ares Management (ARES) operates as a global alternative asset manager with a primary emphasis on credit strategies alongside private equity, real assets, and secondaries. The firm manages significant assets under management (AUM), reported at $644 billion as of March 31, 2026. In recent weeks, the stock has exhibited solid momentum, contributing to year-to-date returns near 25% as of early July 2026. Performance has been supported by continued fundraising success, including record first-quarter inflows, and stable fee-related earnings. Upcoming second-quarter results on July 31, 2026, represent a key near-term event that could influence sentiment. Broader market activity around alternative asset managers has remained constructive, with ARES benefiting from sustained institutional demand for credit and private market solutions.
KKR & Co. (KKR) is a diversified alternative asset manager with operations spanning private equity, credit, real assets, capital markets, and insurance solutions. The company has pursued expansion through targeted acquisitions and joint ventures, including recent activity in renewable energy platforms and infrastructure. In recent market activity, the stock has shown resilience, delivering year-to-date returns around 24% through early July 2026. Second-quarter earnings are scheduled for release on July 30, 2026, offering a potential catalyst. Deal flow and perpetual capital initiatives have contributed to positioning, while overall sector sentiment has remained supportive amid ongoing institutional interest in private markets.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of high-performing AI trading bots from a much larger library of hundreds of bots that trade thousands of different tickers. Only the most suitable bots for prevailing market conditions earn placement in this trending section. Available bots span diverse trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance metrics, and ticker sets, with statistics often reflecting win rates, profit factors, and drawdown profiles that vary widely across offerings. This resource allows users to explore data-driven approaches tailored to equities such as Ares Management (ARES) and KKR & Co. (KKR). Review the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for additional details.
Ares Management (ARES) and KKR & Co. (KKR) both operate within alternative asset management but differ in emphasis: ARES maintains a stronger orientation toward credit and specialized strategies, while KKR integrates broader private equity, real assets, and insurance capabilities. Growth drivers reflect these distinctions, with ARES tied closely to credit market conditions and fundraising cycles, and KKR benefiting from diversified deal sourcing and capital markets activity. Recent momentum has been broadly comparable, supported by similar year-to-date gains amid constructive sector sentiment. Risk factors include sensitivity to interest rates and transaction volumes for both, though KKR’s wider platform may introduce additional exposure to insurance and infrastructure cycles. Market positioning shows overlap in institutional client bases, yet contrasts in revenue mix create different trade-offs for investors assessing relative stability versus growth potential.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in recent performance, stability of fundraising metrics, and positioning ahead of earnings releases, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a slight probabilistic preference to Ares Management (ARES) due to its demonstrated AUM expansion and credit-focused resilience. However, KKR & Co. (KKR) remains closely competitive given its diversification and deal activity. Any edge remains modest and contingent on forthcoming quarterly data rather than a decisive separation.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ARES’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKKR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ARES’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KKR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
ARES (@Investment Managers) experienced а +4.20% price change this week, while KKR (@Investment Managers) price change was +3.30% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.28%.
ARES is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
KKR is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| ARES | KKR | ARES / KKR | |
| Capitalization | 27.5B | 87B | 32% |
| EBITDA | 2.23B | 9.89B | 23% |
| Gain YTD | -22.841 | -23.669 | 97% |
| P/E Ratio | 56.13 | 32.97 | 170% |
| Revenue | 5.91B | 20.4B | 29% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 132B | - |
| Total Debt | 14.1B | 54.6B | 26% |
ARES | KKR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 15 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 13 Undervalued | 79 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 69 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 70 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | 92 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ARES's Valuation (13) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for KKR (79). This means that ARES’s stock grew significantly faster than KKR’s over the last 12 months.
ARES's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as KKR (69). This means that ARES’s stock grew similarly to KKR’s over the last 12 months.
KKR's SMR Rating (70) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as ARES (96). This means that KKR’s stock grew similarly to ARES’s over the last 12 months.
ARES's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as KKR (62). This means that ARES’s stock grew similarly to KKR’s over the last 12 months.
ARES's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as KKR (92). This means that ARES’s stock grew similarly to KKR’s over the last 12 months.
| ARES | KKR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 74% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ARES has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ARES jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ARES | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARES | 100% | +0.12% | ||
| KKR - ARES | 83% Closely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| OWL - ARES | 78% Closely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| BX - ARES | 78% Closely correlated | +0.77% | ||
| TPG - ARES | 77% Closely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| APO - ARES | 77% Closely correlated | +0.42% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KKR has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KKR jumps, then BX could also see price increases.