Alternative asset managers Ares Management Corporation (ARES) and KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) represent prominent players in private markets. This comparison examines their business models, recent stock performance, and positioning within the current market environment. Investors and traders focused on financial services, growth-oriented equities, or sector rotation strategies may find the analysis relevant for assessing relative value and momentum between these two names. The review draws on observable market data and developments from recent weeks to provide a balanced perspective.
Ares Management Corporation is a global alternative asset manager specializing in credit, private equity, and real assets, with approximately $644 billion in AUM as of March 31, 2026. In recent market activity, ARES shares have shown resilience, closing at $126.51 on July 24, 2026, after a 4.31% single-day gain. Year-to-date returns stand near 19.86%, outpacing the S&P 500 benchmark. Factors influencing performance include sustained demand for private credit strategies and capital raising momentum. Recent weeks have featured analyst commentary on earnings growth and AUM expansion, supporting positive sentiment despite broader market volatility in the alternatives sector.
KKR & Co. Inc. operates as a diversified alternative asset manager with significant holdings in private equity, credit, and capital markets. The firm reported approximately $99.36 per share on July 24, 2026, reflecting a 3.53% daily increase. Year-to-date performance approximates 21.76%, also ahead of broader equity indices. Recent market activity has been shaped by ongoing deal activity, including large-scale infrastructure and energy transactions, alongside anticipation of second-quarter 2026 results scheduled for July 30. Sentiment has been supported by management commentary on fee-related earnings growth and confidence in exceeding certain 2026 targets, balanced against market volatility affecting exit timing.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots optimized for prevailing market conditions. Tickeron maintains hundreds of AI Trading Bots that trade thousands of different tickers across diverse styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance profiles. Only the strongest and most suitable bots earn placement in the Trending section, with examples drawn from over 350 total bots where the top performers are highlighted. Available statistics include metrics such as annualized returns, Sharpe ratios, profit factors, and drawdown profiles that help users evaluate suitability. These bots vary widely in their approach, from short-term signal generation to longer-horizon strategies. For traders seeking data-driven insights into current market opportunities, explore the Trending AI Robots page.
ARES and KKR share core exposures to private markets yet differ in scale and emphasis. ARES maintains a heavier tilt toward credit strategies, which have provided relative stability amid interest-rate shifts. KKR offers broader diversification across private equity and infrastructure, supported by a larger global footprint and active capital markets business. Recent momentum favors ARES in price appreciation over the past month, while KKR demonstrates strength in deal origination and upcoming earnings visibility. Risk factors include redemption pressures in private credit vehicles for both, alongside sensitivity to exit multiples and regulatory developments. Sector exposure remains aligned, though KKR’s larger AUM base introduces different liquidity dynamics. Overall market sentiment reflects cautious optimism for alternatives, with trade-offs centered on growth consistency versus scale advantages.
Based on observable factors such as recent price consistency, AUM trajectory, and relative positioning, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorable near-term performance to ARES. Stronger recent momentum and credit-focused resilience appear to provide a slight edge in trend stability compared with KKR, though both names remain well-positioned within the alternatives space. This assessment reflects probabilistic analysis of available data rather than definitive forecasts.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ARES’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKKR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ARES’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KKR’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
ARES (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.66% price change this week, while KKR (@Investment Managers) price change was -2.38% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.54%.
ARES is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
KKR is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| ARES | KKR | ARES / KKR | |
| Capitalization | 31B | 93.2B | 33% |
| EBITDA | 2.23B | 9.74B | 23% |
| Gain YTD | -12.801 | -18.088 | 71% |
| P/E Ratio | 63.15 | 33.17 | 190% |
| Revenue | 5.91B | 21.1B | 28% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 14.1B | 54.6B | 26% |
ARES | KKR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 35 | 40 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 69 Overvalued | 80 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 67 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 70 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | 94 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ARES's Valuation (69) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as KKR (80). This means that ARES’s stock grew similarly to KKR’s over the last 12 months.
ARES's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as KKR (67). This means that ARES’s stock grew similarly to KKR’s over the last 12 months.
KKR's SMR Rating (70) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as ARES (97). This means that KKR’s stock grew similarly to ARES’s over the last 12 months.
ARES's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as KKR (54). This means that ARES’s stock grew similarly to KKR’s over the last 12 months.
ARES's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as KKR (94). This means that ARES’s stock grew similarly to KKR’s over the last 12 months.
| ARES | KKR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 58% | 5 days ago 53% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 56% | 5 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 69% | 5 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 77% | 5 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 72% | 5 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 77% | 8 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 66% | 5 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 60% | 5 days ago 52% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 69% | 5 days ago 59% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ARES has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ARES jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ARES | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARES | 100% | +0.59% | ||
| KKR - ARES | 83% Closely correlated | +1.18% | ||
| BX - ARES | 79% Closely correlated | +3.30% | ||
| OWL - ARES | 78% Closely correlated | -1.85% | ||
| APO - ARES | 78% Closely correlated | +3.59% | ||
| TPG - ARES | 77% Closely correlated | +0.84% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KKR has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KKR jumps, then BX could also see price increases.